Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Supplementary Memorandum by the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (LGR 01(a))

PASSPORTING AND RING FENCING

  1.  In giving oral evidence to the Committee on 27 April 2004 ODPM officials undertook to provide a note in response to the following question from Mr Brady:

    "If the total percentage of local government expenditure which is ring fenced is going to come down to ten per cent could you give us an indication of what the percentage would be of those funds which are ring-fenced and passported added together?"

  2.  Strictly speaking, ODPM calculates the percentage of ring fencing as a percentage of Government funding, whereas passporting is expressed in terms of increases in spending. Obviously, local authority spending is financed through council tax income as well as through grant from central Government.

  3.  The figures for 2004-05 are as follows:
£ million
Budgeted Revenue Expenditure(a)77,061
Partly financed by Government grant56,183
  —Of which ring fenced(b)6,220


Schools spending: 2003-04 base spending for passporting
22,499
2003-04 passporting target90


  (a) excluding parish precepts

  (b) represents 11.1% of Government grant in 2004-05, on present plans will reduce to below 10% by 2005-06

  So:

    —  ring fenced grant plus passporting target increased spending = £7,510 million, which is 13.4% of total Government funding or 9.7% of total budgeted revenue spending; and

    —  ring fenced grant plus schools spending after passporting = £30,009 million, which is 53.4% of total Government funding or 38.9% of total budgeted revenue spending.

Local Government Finance Directorate

Office of the Deputy Prime Minister

June 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 27 July 2004