Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 240-259)

11 NOVEMBER 2003

SIR GRAHAM MELDRUM CBE, MR PETER MORPHEW, MR ROBIN CURRIE AND MS MARIE WINCKLER

  Q240  Chris Mole: You have just described how the bulk of your activities will move into the Audit Commission? Why is it necessary to retain an entirely separate in-service Inspectorate at all?

  Sir Graham Meldrum: I think you define two very distinct pieces of work. The role of the Inspectorate is drawn from a wide range of people but obviously people with professional expertise in the Fire Service. For instance there are quite a number of operational procedures that are necessary at national level and it is necessary to ensure that those procedures are conducted in the spirit of health and safety. It is also necessary to ensure that when the Fire Service is conducting its operational duties it does so in a manner which is common throughout the land, particularly as we are moving towards people working together in relation to reaction to terrorist incidents. We do not want fire brigades adopting all sorts of different procedures in relation to operational incidents. I think the role that we are undertaking for the future is one of primary importance to the Fire Service and one of primary importance to central Government.

  Q241  Chris Mole: I will return to the original question and ask the College what they will be doing.

  Mr Currie: I think the main difference so far as the College is concerned is that it will move from being a simple provider of services on the basis of that which customers demand of it, to having a central role in taking forward a whole range of issues for the Fire Service as a central body. That is something we feel very comfortable about and is a very positive aspect within the White Paper for the College.

  Q242  Chris Mole: So the White Paper sees you as a centre of excellence in the future. What are the key changes that you have to make to become that?

  Mr Currie: They link to what I just said really in that there are a whole range of activities which the Fire Service has traditionally done in a slightly isolationist way in that each different fire service has had the ability to go and deal with issues as they have seen fit. There has never been a central doctrinal body for the Fire Service. One of the contributions which the White Paper believes the college can make is to pull together all of those issues, to be a centre of knowledge not just in terms of teaching but also the holders of knowledge, the gateway for bringing in information from the operational service and sharing it. It is certainly work that we have done in the past and it is certainly something that can be developed more.

  Q243  Chris Mole: Is that not a similar set of skills that Sir Graham has just described to us that they are going to have in terms of advising ODPM and ministers?

  Mr Currie: Clearly we are going to have to work even more closely together in the future. They are really different roles in that we are going to be a centre where people can come for a resource and we hope that that will develop further as the plans of the Department unfold about how that is going to be delivered. There are issues there about providing a service rather than providing information and we hope to be providing a service in support of the rest of the Fire and Rescue Service rather than examining it.

  Q244  Mr Betts: The White Paper talks about the new ideas for the Fire and Rescue Service being based on evidence from rigorous research. We might all say think that is pretty obvious and true and we would all agree with it. Then it goes on to talk about the need for an invigorated programme of fire-related research, implying that what is going on at present really is not adequate or substantial. It talks about the role of the Fire Service College as a centre of technical excellence contributing towards this. However, when we actually look at the information available to us about how efficient the service is now, there is precious little, is there not?

  Sir Graham Meldrum: In terms of research, there is a separate body within the directorate that carries out research on behalf of the Fire Service. The White Paper identifies the need to look at the Fire Service College in relation to research. There is a lot of research carried out at the moment into equipment, standards of use of equipment, operational procedures and the like. Some of that is related very much to the Integrated Risk Management Planning System. The research being carried out now is split between the directorate itself and the College. I think the recommendation is to see a wider role for the Fire Service College in respect of research.

  Ms Winckler: I should say that within headquarters there is a policy research team linked to a statistics division which carries out research into such issues as arson control. That support the main research division.

  Q245  Mr Betts: But in the end there is precious little that tells us how efficient the Fire and Rescue Service is.

  Sir Graham Meldrum: In what respect?

  Q246  Mr Betts: You can tell us when a 999 call comes in how quickly and how often you get the fire engines out of the fire station within a given period of time.

  Sir Graham Meldrum: Yes.

  Q247  Mr Betts: You cannot tell us how many 999 calls you actually respond to within that given period of time because, as I understand it, if the fire engine is not in the fire station it does not count.

  Mr Currie: You can get that information.

  Q248  Mr Betts: It does not count in the statistics. The statistics that we are given as evidence is that the 90-odd% response rate only applies to fire engines actually in the fire station. Is that not a piece of nonsense? The person out there whose house is burning down is not particularly reassured that the statistic does not count because there is no fire engine available.

  Sir Graham Meldrum: This comes back to the situation that prevails in relation to the standards of fire cover. The answer is yes; this is all related to the very strict laid-down relationship between standards of fire cover and the response times and the measurement that the Inspectorate made in relation to that. The standards of fire cover as we know are dated way back into the 1930s and all the associated gathering of information relates to them. They were very strictly laid down and people adhered to them. There was a review carried in 1985 which came to the conclusion that they were still very valid and we continued with them. What they required—if we take A risk for instance—was that two fire appliances should be able to attend an A risk incident—an inner city type incident—in five minutes and a follow-on in eight minutes. To give that sort of measurement that was reasonable and with some sort of basis for it, they did the timed runs from the fire station. The base of all the information in relation to the returns that were made was from the fire station, as a statistical base. At one time you would have said that that was extremely valid because the fire brigade did very little else except respond from a fire station. However, with the development of new roles for the Fire Service that has all changed. As we move into the Integrated Risk Management world then the statistical base will have to change entirely.

  Q249  Mr Betts: So what you are really saying to us then is that what we have now is a load of statistics related to outdated concepts drawn up in the 1930s. We do not really have the information which we need to decide how the Service should be configured and should operate for the future. We are actually going off into the White Paper and what it seeks to achieve without any real basis of research information. We are training tomorrow's operators in the Fire Service without any idea really as to the basic information on which we should be developing the Service and prioritising the training.

  Mr Morphew: I should say in response to that question that we are not responsible for the statistics themselves.

  Q250  Chairman: You are doing the inspections so surely at least you should be saying that you are inspecting something that is sensible rather than inspecting whether people are achieving rubbish standards.

  Mr Morphew: To your last two words, Chairman, I would be entirely with you. We are ready to change the statistics. We have recognised for some time that they needed changing to reflect the new way of measuring how well the public service delivers its services and the best way, we are advised, is through looking at output measures: how well people actually do the job. If you look at how well the Fire Service has been doing the job over the last five years you can see that fire deaths have gone down significantly; injuries are also down and good progress is being made. A committee has also recently been formed to look at the whole range of statistics, how to measure effectiveness as well as efficiency. Work is being done.

  Q251  Chairman: You say things have improved, but how far is that down to the Fire Service and how far is that down to changes in the building regulations?

  Mr Morphew: I think it is very largely down to the Government getting behind the Fire Service and public services in 1999 as part of best value and concentrating on what matters to the community. The biggest concern for the community is: is the fire put out? (There is a statistic to measure that.) Was the fire contained to the room of origin? (There is a way to measure that). Are the fatalities going down and what more can be done to bring those fatalities down further? Are injuries going down? We are succeeding in all respects and I do think generally that is as a result of the Government's push in 1999.

  Q252  Mr Clelland: As regards the improvements that you have referred to such as the reduction in fire deaths, can we measure which of those are due to building regulations, which are due to fire preventative measures and which are due to improvements and efficiency in the actual operation of the Service?

  Mr Morphew: I do not think we can measure those individually yet. In totality that is what we are seeing; we are seeing the effect of community fire safety activity by brigades, the fitting of smoke detectors as a result of the investment in the National Community Fire Safety Centre built for educating the public about safety. We are seeing from the statutory effects of 30 years of legislation in buildings to which the public resort and where they work. All of those things coming together are having this overall effect.

  Q253  Mr Clelland: So it could be that we are not actually putting fires out any more efficiently, any quicker or any more effectively; it is these other measures that are responsible for the reductions in fire deaths.

  Mr Morphew: I think also there has been a lot of technological development which is getting us putting out fires more quickly.

  Q254  Mr Clelland: Can we measure this?

  Mr Morphew: Not individually, no. Sometimes we can; we can measure the reverse effect more clearly where we are working in a socially deprived area and we can that maybe doors have been taken off rooms, maybe the smoke detector is not working because there is no battery in it or maybe there is no smoke detector. That is the way we are coming at it. We can see where the deficiencies are and that is where we are concentrating at the moment.

  Q255  Mr Betts: What about the College? We have not really heard very much about what the College's role is in all this. Is it simply carrying on training in the same old ways or is it a powerhouse of new ideas, thrusting forward into the future and taking the Service onwards? We have not really heard much about whether you can actually deliver on that.

  Mr Currie: Let me reassure you then because there is absolutely no doubt that there is a profound difference in the basis on which members of the Fire Service are being trained and developed as a result of the IPDS system. From the point of view of the College in responding to that over the past 15 months we have totally changed all of our training processes and systems in order to meet the roles which are clearly identified within the Fire Service. We are already delivering that training with excellent results, really changing the approach of people who come to the College because they are being taught in a modern way rather than in a simple pot filling basis. It is much more demanding on both the students and the College but we are absolutely certain that the IPDS system is going to make a profound difference to the way the Fire Service operates.

  Q256  Chairman: This is daft, is it not? You actually do not have the statistical base to know what the problems are and you are putting in a new training system based on your hunch, presumably, as to what the issues are. Would it not have been fundamental for the College to have done the research and got the statistical information so that you can make valid judgments as to which is the right way forward?

  Mr Currie: I can assure you that the research that you refer to has gone on for almost ten years in the development of the IPDS system which has been brought together both to meet what I would call the hard edged operational needs of providing the service on the ground, but also many elements of   further education, cultural awareness and improvements in people skills. I am not sure how much of that you have been able to study so far, but if you could see the depths in which that study has taken place and, indeed, the wide range of people who have contributed to that knowledge base I think you would be content that that was very well researched indeed.

  Q257  Mr Cummings: Obviously the Inspectorate and the College have been instrumental in creating the nature of the Service. Having been responsible for the nature of the Service are you not contributing to many of the problems that lie within the Service? If that is the case, how are you going to stop being part of the problem, become pro-active and become part of the solution?

  Sir Graham Meldrum: I would say that over the years—certainly over the recent years—both the College and the Inspectorate have made a lot of effort to try to take the Fire Service forward. If I could take the example of community fire safety, for instance, part of the Inspectorate is the National Community Fire Safety Centre. We operate that on behalf of central Government. We are very instrumental in moving the whole effort of the Fire Service—with the co-operation of the CACFOA, chief officers and others—away from the simple response element of the Fire Service work into community fire safety. It is very well documented. We, in the Inspectorate, have done a series of thematic reviews of the Fire Service and the Baine review brought together a great deal of that work. For instance, the first thematic review was quality and diversity within the Service. That was followed by another one where we looked at fit for duty within the Service and we took forward all the issues of management, sickness and early retirement within the Service. Then we did a whole series of things looking at community fire safety, unwanted fire alarms from the automatic fire alarm systems and then we also did a thematic review entitled Managing a modernised Fire Service: Bridging the Gap which identified a lot of problems in relation to management and recommended that things like accelerated promotion, and two-tier entry should be brought into the Fire Service.

  Q258  Mr Cummings: We have been told in evidence that the Inspectorate in particular have been pushing the Fire Service for years (and I quoting here) "to jump through all sorts of hoops and performance measures that are almost useless even in assessing their performance in what was their role, responding to fires."

  Sir Graham Meldrum: I am in difficulty knowing what that refers to but, as I said before, the Fire Service Inspectorate was required—in addition to all the other areas which I term a professional role—to act on behalf of Government in respect of the value for money so we have to do that audit based on—

  Q259  Mr Cummings: Are you pointing the finger at the Ministry?

  Sir Graham Meldrum: The statutory requirements of gathering information that we did on behalf of Government, as was done with all the other local government services; nothing different.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 4 February 2004