Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by the John Grooms Housing Association (JGHA) (BRG 01)

  I was interested to note that the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister Select Committee will be taking evidence from the ODPM Minister, Phil Hope MP, on the issue of building regulations and Lifetime Homes. These are two issues which concern us in our work building houses for people who are wheelchair users.

  As you will know, most new housing is designed to meet the needs of just 18% of the population (ie those people who are male, right handed, with good sight and hearing, aged between 18 and 40, able bodied and fit). The other 72% of the population are forced to modify their life styles to accommodate their home environment. If you are a wheelchair user, however, you may be forced to do more than just "modify your lifestyle".

  Living in an unsuitable house can restrict the wheelchair user to one room. Unable to move around; that one room becomes the bathroom, kitchen, living and sleeping space—the disabled person's house is not a home; it's a prison cell.

  At we believe that a house should liberate and provide opportunities for independence—something that the current supply of housing is conspicuously failing to do. For more than 30 years John Grooms Housing Association (JGHA) has specialised in building houses which are suitable for people who are wheelchair users and which will give them the level of independence at home that non-disabled people take for granted.

  JGHA estimates that the number of wheelchair users in the UK is between 350,000 and 750,000. The discrepancy is explained by the fact that some people use a wheelchair all the time while others only do so when their disabling condition requires it. Demand for wheelchair accessible properties is likely to increase in the future as more people live longer (age has a close correlation with wheelchair use) and people survive an injury or recover from a severe illness which previously they would have died from.

  Despite this obvious need; there is still a significant shortage of suitable housing for people who are wheelchair users. JGHA estimate that up to 300,000 wheelchair accessible houses are needed across the country to ensure that all physically disabled people have somewhere to live that is suitably adapted.

  JGHA fears that in the Government's push to increase the numbers of new houses, especially in the four housing growth areas in the South East of England, wheelchair accessible housing will be overlooked due to its higher cost per unit when compared with general needs housing.

  With respect to the two issues being examined by the committee:

PART M ENFORCEMENT

  The changes to Part M of the building regulations in October 1999 were a welcome recognition that reasonable provision needed to be made to enable disabled people to gain access to a new house. However it is JGHA's experience, endorsed in a report published by the Joseph Rowntree Trust[1]that Part M is not widely recognised by builders and is only variably enforced by building control officers.

  I noticed that Mr Kidney MP made the same point last week when serving as part of the committee examining the Housing Bill (Hansard 24 Feb 2004, Standing Committee E, Column 718). Mr Kidney described how one of his constituents, Tim Midgley, made an assessment of the 500,000 new houses built following the implementation of Part M between October 1999 and December 2002. Mr Midgley found that only 71,000 properties were compliant—a mere 15%.

  To account for the fact that planning permission may have been granted before October 1999, they organised two surveys of homes in September and November of last year. Of the 472 houses surveyed in only 6, a risible 1.3%, were wheelchair users able to get into the front door.

  The fact that people who are wheelchair users are still excluded from the vast majority of new houses is, in our opinion, a disgrace. It underlines the reason why our current campaign is entitled the "Lucky Dip Campaign". The chance of a disabled person finding an accessible house to live in is equivalent to winning the first prize in a lucky dip.

  While I accept that the Government has recognised problems with the enforcement of Part M, as Lord Rooker's announcement last October (Hansard, 15 October 2003, Column 934) showed, waiting two years before the report is published is far too long. Disabled people need somewhere suitable to live now as well as in the future.

LIFETIME HOUSES

  Whilst writing I also wanted to reflect on the difference between "lifetime houses" and "wheelchair accessible" houses. It is JGHA's concern that by building lifetime homes; local authorities will be assured that they are meeting the all needs of disabled people.

  The Lifetime House is a concept which JGHA is in favour of as it recognises that people's needs change through the various stages in their life. However a lifetime house does not always allow a wheelchair user to move into the house straight away and live there as flexibly/reasonably as a non-disabled person with the minimum of adaptations.

  A wheelchair accessible house is designed around the needs of the wheelchair user and will allow them to participate in all aspects of family life (ie putting children into bed, preparing an evening meal, etc) with the minimum of personal inconvenience. On the other hand, a lifetime home only guarantees access to the ground floor for the person using a wheelchair.

  Even then, access may only be on the basis that turning around in the entrance hallway involves going into a room off the hallway to do so. Door widths may not accommodate an electric wheelchair user, there may not be an internal area suitable for charging batteries or entrances will not have a long enough run up area.

  Design features such as space for a through the floor lift or the provision of bathing/toileting facilities on both floors of the house, if more than one storey, are incorporated into a wheelchair accessible house. Wheelchair accessible houses will generally require a larger footprint than general needs housing—a factor which will obviously need to be factored in when planning housing in the growth areas.

  Fittings and white goods are designed with the wheelchair user in mind with the thought that it must work for the person who will actually live in the house with the minimum of lifestyle changes.

  To address both these issues; JGHA supports the setting of specific planning targets for wheelchair accessible housing (such as 10% in the recently published London Plan) to ensure that the housing needs of people who are wheelchair users are not overlooked. Indeed JGHA would suggest that the 10% target is one that should be adopted countrywide to address the severe shortage of wheelchair housing I highlighted earlier.

  If you would like any further information about our work, please do not hesitate to contact me.

David Harmer

Chief Executive





1   Imrie, R (2003) The impact of Part M on the design of new housing, Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 26 May 2004