Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Fourth Report


APPENDIX 1 - VISIT NOTE

Urban Affairs Sub-committee visit to Easington, County Durham, and South Yorkshire

Tuesday 1st December - Wednesday 2nd December 2003

PARTICIPANTS

Andrew Bennett, MP
Clive Betts, MP
John Cummings, MP
Chris Mole, MP
Christine Russell, MP
  
Kate Emms, Clerk
Ben Kochan, Committee Specialist
Ray Hudson, Special Advisor
Fred Robinson, Special Advisor

TUESDAY 1ST DECEMBER

Easington

Overview

1. The Sub-committee was welcomed to Easington by Councillor Alan Napier, the Leader of Easington District Council.

Progress on Regeneration in Easington

2. Janet Johnson, Director of Regeneration and Development set out the problems in Easington and the progress made in regenerating the district since the pit closures. More than 10,000 jobs in coal mining and 2000 jobs in textile industries had been lost. The local economy was still fragile. Employment was now mainly in retailing and contact centres. Jobs were being lost faster than they were being created. The majority of new jobs were not going to residents and there had been a recent decline in employment of residents. There were low levels of income and car ownership, and low levels of educational attainment and achievement. The district had one of the worst health records in the country. There are low aspirations and confidence. The incapacity rate amongst working age people was 16.3% compared to a national rate of 5.5%. 21of 26 wards were in the top 10% most deprived in the country. The standard mortality ratio was the 12th highest in Great Britain. All 26 wards were in the top 5% most deprived in terms of health. Literacy and numeracy were the worst in the region. There were 900 public sector housing voids.

3. A Task Force had been set up in 1991 involving a wide range of agencies. Community involvement was increasing and there had been engagement with the private sector. 225 hectares of derelict land had been remediated, 257 hectares of former colliery land had been reclaimed, 1,059 new private sector houses had been built and 5,600 new jobs attracted to the district. 1,250,000 sq.m. of new business floorspace had been created. Two town centre developments were being carried out. There was now greater emphasis on promoting social regeneration, to increase economic diversity and local employability and to seek community based economic growth. The council was seeking to improve the transport and access infrastructure and the relationship of coalfield issues within Regional Agendas and Strategies (RSS, RES, RHS). Currently there was no strategic document or context for Coalfield issues regionally. There were major questions about future investment incentives with the ending of the enterprise zones.

4. The Sub-committee was then taken on a tour around the coalfield sites and the villages in the area, where they saw some of the problems and solutions that had been discussed earlier in the day. The tour included physical developments, reclamation of former colliery sites in the enterprise zones, environmental improvements and town & village centre renewal programmes:

  • Dawdon Colliery was one of the first Enterprise Zone sites. It had a mixture of light manufacturing, warehousing, call centres, and several vacant speculative units.
  • Seaham Colliery had been reclaimed by One NorthEast/English Partnerships and housing development was being planned.
  • Vane Tempest Colliery, another site reclaimed by One NorthEast/English Partnerships, where housing is being built
  • Seaham Harbour. The harbour had originally been built for the transport of coal but the Dock Company was being relocated to another basin to make space for the expansion of Seaham town centre.
  • Dalton Park retail centre - an out-of-town retailing park which was providing a wider range of shopping than is available in any of the towns and villages.

5. The final part of the tour looked at Easington Colliery, a dilapidated village suffering from low housing demand, poor retailing, poor access to the main road network and the coastal rail route. The main street is very narrow as it was not designed for cars.

6. After the tour the committee met with officials from Easington District Council: Councillor Alan Napier, Leader of Easington District Council, Peter Coe, Head of Regeneration and Partnerships and Tony Forster, Senior Economic Development Officer. The problems posed by the ending of many Government and EU regeneration programmes in the area were discussed, as well as the problems of low housing demand and the poor environment in the villages, and possible strategies for addressing the low housing demand.

WEDNESDAY, 2ND DECEMBER

South Yorkshire

Overview

7. The Sub-committee was taken around key coalfield sites and developments in South Yorkshire by:

  • Janet Bibby, Chief Executive, Coalfields Regeneration Trust
  • John Woodside, Head of Community Planning, Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council and Local Strategic Partnership representative
  • Martin Kendall, External Funding Officer, Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
  • Richard Poundford, Head of Rotherham Industrial Development Office
  • Ian Deighton, Single Regeneration Budget Manager, Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
  • Richard Breese, Strategic Coordinator, South Yorkshire Coalfield Partnership.

The Committee saw:

  • Cortonwood Enterprise Zone a former colliery site which has now been developed with a range of light industry, and offices for call centres, with adjacent housing and retail uses.
  • Old Moor Wetlands Centre an area managed by the RSPB where as part of the reclamation process, new wildlife habitats and flood defences have been created.
  • Field's End Enterprise Zone which had attracted a range of warehousing and some speculative development which has yet to be occupied.
  • Thurnscoe Managed Workspace which was developed in the old pit head baths building by Barnsley Council.
  • South Kirby Industrial Estate which had been equipped with services but had failed to attract development.
  • West End Estate, Hemsworth in Wakefield, an mining village suffering from neglected terrace housing, poor environment and some anti-social behaviour.
  • Grimethorpe Village - a mining village with a poor environment. Much of the worst housing had been demolished leaving large open spaces, but it is as yet unclear when redevelopment will take place.
  • The Grimethorpe/Houghton employment zone - former colliery sites which have been reclaimed with some land developed for light industrial uses but there is limited demand for development and the landscaping is poor.
  • Manvers Way is the main Enterprise Zone area which has attracted modern industrial uses including call centres, distribution centres and some manufacturing operations as well as the administrative offices for the Coalfields Regeneration Trust.
  • Conisborough, a traditional mining village, with poor housing, social problems, limited shopping and high levels of worklessness.

8. The Committee visited the Acorn Centre in Grimethorpe. The former British Coal offices had been purchased by Barnsley council and redeveloped for community uses and training and some small business spaces. The Committee saw two short presentations at the Centre. The centre's manager, Jayne Remington described a wide range of community support and training projects which took place in the centre which included a citizen's advice bureau, business advisors, youth support services and basic skills training. Steve Palmer from Barnsley Community Build described its work helping former miners develop new skills, particularly for construction work. He pointed to considerable interest among former miners in retraining which was frustrated by a lack of courses and trainers.

9. At the offices of the Coalfields Regeneration Trust, Richard Breese from the South Yorkshire Coalfields Partnership Board set out the major challenges for the regeneration of the coalfields in South Yorkshire. Most colliery-related sites had been reclaimed and the environment had been greatly improved. Some of the key infrastructure projects especially new roads were completed. There had been major employment creation in the heart of the former coalfields, but low wage and low skills jobs predominated which were vulnerable to macro-economic forces. Recorded unemployment rates were historically low but the record on education, health, social problems, community development, housing, public transport was mixed. Former coalfields need to be linked with each other and into regional, national and international networks.

10. The Committee then saw two presentations about key projects seeking to regenerate the South Yorkshire coalfields. Greg Lindley from Rotherham Council's Investment and Development Office described plans for an advanced manufacturing park at Waverley close to junction 33 of the M1 between Rotherham and Sheffield. Mr Lindley described the joint venture with the UK Coal Mining which also involved the University of Sheffield and Boeing. It included a mixture of development for high technology industry and training, with possible new housing developments as well. New transport links were needed with the M1 and an extension of public transport networks to support the scheme.

11. Jeremy Johnson from Doncaster Council's planning department set out the private sector development for reopening Finningley RAF airbase as a commercial airport. It was estimated that the airport could create 6,000 jobs by 2014. The council was looking at how to improve the transport links to the new airport.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 March 2004