Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Supplementary memorandum by the Department of Health (COA 59(a))

Annex A

  1.  Many submissions to this inquiry suggest that coalfields regeneration is quite well advanced. How successful have the various Government programmes been to date in terms of meeting the needs of coalfield communities?

  The Department of Health is strongly committed to reducing health inequalities in deprived communities such as coalfields areas, and recognises the part that regeneration policies have to play in engaging communities and addressing the wider determinants of health. I am working closely with colleagues in the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister to support the work that they do. In addition, there are a number of Department of Health-led programmes which are having an impact on health and regeneration in coalfields communities, the details of which are outlined below.

RESOURCE ALLOCATION

The new funding formula:

  The NHS Plan stated that "following the review of the existing weighted capitation formula used to distribute NHS funding, reducing inequalities will be a key criterion for allocating NHS resources to different parts of the country" (paragraph 13.9).

  The review of the formula has now taken place. The new formula has been used for the latest round of NHS allocations covering the three years 2003-04 to 2005-06.

  The need element of the formula has been updated to use better measures of deprivation and to take some account of "unmet need".

  The need element uses better measures of deprivation which are now available, eg ODPM's Indices of Multiple Deprivation (2000) which provide a useful up-to-date set of validated measures of area deprivation, capable of being updated regularly.

  The need element of the formula includes mortality measures (which measure death rates for certain age groups compared to the national average) and morbidity measures (limiting long-standing illness ratios and disability measures).

  The formula also takes some account of "unmet need" where certain groups in the population eg socio-economically deprived groups do not receive the same level of healthcare services as that of others with the same health characteristics.

  The new formula therefore provides a better measure of health need in all areas.

Health inequalities adjustment:

  The health inequalities adjustment (HIA) was introduced in 2001-02 while longer-term work on the new formula took place. For 2002-03 HIA funding of £148 million was shared between 54 Health Authorities. HIA funding was based on years of life lost for circulatory diseases, all cancers, accidents, suicides, undetermined injury and infant deaths under one year for all causes.

  The new formula replaces both the old formula and the interim health inequalities adjustment. To protect those PCTs who have benefited from the interim health inequalities adjustment, the existing 2002-03 allocation of £148 million has been added to those PCTs' baselines.

  Table 1 identifies the three-year percentage increases in revenue allocations for those PCTs in the coalfield communities. It also notes HIA funding for these PCTs now included in baselines for 2003-06.

  It is important to remember that the funding formula calculates PCT target shares of available resources based on the age distribution of the population, additional need and unavoidable geographical variations in the cost of providing services. It does not determine actual allocations, which reflect pace of change policy decisions on the speed at which PCTs are brought nearer to target.

Table 1

PERCENTAGE INCREASE IN ALLOCATIONS & HEALTH INEQUALITIES ADJUSTMENT FUNDING IN COALFIELD COMMUNITY PCTS FOR 2003-06


PCT
2003-06 three
year percentage
increase
(%)
2003-04 health
inequalities
adjustment
(£000s)
2004-05 health
inequalities
adjustment
(£000s)
2005-06 health
inequalities
adjustment
(£000s)

Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
31.44
1,284
1,284
1,284
Barking and Dagenham
42.48
0
0
0
Barnsley
31.00
1,990
1,990
1,990
Chesterfield
30.52
417
417
417
Derwentside
30.74
357
357
357
Doncaster Central
30.61
879
879
879
Doncaster East
30.19
726
726
726
Doncaster West
33.62
922
922
922
Durham and Chester-Le-Street
28.15
580
580
580
Durham Dales
28.71
363
363
363
Easington
40.56
454
454
454
Eastern Hull
30.25
1,366
1,366
1,366
Eastern Wakefield
32.47
1,517
1,517
1,517
Halton
31.06
517
517
517
Hartlepool
30.27
515
515
515
Langbaurgh
30.09
521
521
521
Mansfield District
31.19
367
367
367
Middlesbrough
31.12
1,402
1,402
1,402
North East Lincolnshire
30.39
656
656
656
North Eastern Derbyshire
31.29
559
559
559
North Stoke
30.63
1,023
1,023
1,023
North Tees
30.61
2,331
2,331
2,331
Northamptonshire Heartlands
31.22
0
0
0
Northumberland Care Trust
29.19
2,482
2,482
2,482
Rotherham
30.45
2,019
2,019
2,019
Sedgefield
30.42
390
390
390
South Stoke
30.77
1,041
1,041
1,041
St Helens
34.64
1,556
1,556
1,556
Wakefield West
29.41
1,165
1,165
1,165
West Cumbria
28.08
1,120
1,120
1,120
West Hull
28.42
1,360
1,360
1,360

NHS LIFT (LOCAL IMPROVEMENT FINANCE TRUST)

  NHS LIFT is an ambitious programme to rebuild and refurbish primary and social care facilities to help increase the range of services patients can access closer to where they live. In each LIFT area a local LIFT company with public and private sector shareholding is being established.

  Initially LIFT developments have been prioritised in deprived areas (such as former coalfields) where investment in primary care facilities has historically been difficult to attract. There are now 42 local LIFT projects in development.

  Sixty per cent of the PCTs covering the coalfield communities are within a LIFT area (see table 2). The initial capital value of the investment in primary care facilities (over the period 2004-06) in these LIFT projects areas is estimated to be £170 million.

  For example, in Barnsley (where construction work is due to begin in the next month) there are plans for three brand new primary care centres with a capital cost of £10 million providing services to three former mining villages (Goldthorpe, Thurnscoe and Worsbrough).

Table 2

CURRENT LIFT SCHEMES COVERING COALFIELD AREAS AND INITIAL CAPITAL INVESTMENT


NHS LIFT scheme
Initial capital
Value (£m)

Barnsley LIFT
10
Barking & Havering LIFT
17
Hull LIFT
17
North Notts LIFT
20
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
15
Doncaster LIFT
16
Greater Nottingham LIFT
27
St Helens, Knowlsey, Halton and Warrington LIFT
22
Tees Valley LIFT
25

NHS DIRECT

  NHS Direct is a nurse-led telephone helpline providing health information and advice 24 hours a day, 365 days a year. The NHS Direct principle is to provide people at home with easier and faster advice and information about health and the NHS. NHS Direct nurses are highly experienced, trained professionals who provide patients with the same high quality, consistent, safe level of service across the country. The benefits apply not only to patients who get appropriate advice on the best way of tackling health problems, but also to the NHS because it is an efficient way of using NHS resources.

  NHS Direct has grown from a small pilot project to a substantial national service handling over half-a-million telephone calls and half-a-million internet visitor sessions every month.

  NHS Direct has delivered sustained performance by focusing on eight key measures known as service delivery targets. These indicate how NHS Direct is delivering as a service. To complement these targets, information is also gathered on the final recommended outcomes suggested to patients and additional data on age and gender. Collecting information from theses sources helps NHS Direct determine how best to refine and focus the services in order to continue with improving the patient experience.

  NHS Direct Online has responded to the growing appetite for high quality health information, which makes health one of the most important reasons for using the Internet.

  Over the next couple of years a number of exciting possibilities exist to develop this multi-channel approach further in particular in terms of increased interactivity. These include:

    —  significant expansion of the content of the site including the development of video content; and

    —  delivering the concept of a personal health space that could provide secure access to patient records and on-line transactions.

  In addition to expanding the range of services offered by NHS Direct Online, we will further extend choice through the new NHS Digital service. Following the successful completion of the pilots, work has now begun to develop and run a NHS Direct information service across all digital TV platforms nationwide. The NHS Direct digital TV service, which will start 2004, will provide information on health conditions and treatments, healthy living, medicines, health advice for travellers, health and safety advice, and details of local NHS services, including performance information.

  The expanded role for NHS Direct Online and the launch of the NHS Direct digital TV service will not only greatly increase access but is symbolic of a changing role for patients as co-partners in care. The use of NHS Direct digital TV is particularly relevant for deprived communities, given the fact that Digital TV subscription has a high correlation with lower income groups.

PRIMARY CARE ACCESS

  NHS Plan Target: By 2004, patients will be able to see a primary care professional (PCP) within 24 hours, and a GP within 48 hours.

  Progress towards the target is measured by PCTs who undertake monthly telephone surveys of their GMS practices and PMS providers to establish when the next routine appointment with a GP and primary care professional are available.

  At October 2003, nationally 93.9% of patients were able to be offered an appointment to see a GP within two working days and 92.6% of patients were able to be offered an appointment to see a primary care professional within one working day.

  The 2003 National Patient survey also indicated access is improving—77% of all patients were able to be seen within two days. Excluding those seen without an appointment or pre-booked appointments, then 58% of patients had this level of access. This indicates a 15% improvement over the 2002 result of 43%.

  As part of the commitment to improving access to primary care, PCTs received £168 million for 2003-04 to improve access to primary care. This was made recurrent from 2003-04 and forms part of PCT resource allocations.

  At October 2003, the National Primary Care Development Team's (NPDT) Advanced Access model covered over 4,900 practices representing a population coverage of 32 million patients. This is set to increase to 37 million by March 2004. Practices taking part in the programme have seen a 72% reduction in waits to see a GP and a 50% reduction to see a nurse.

NHS WALK-IN CENTRES

  The 42 NHS Walk-in Centres were developed as part of the wider plan to modernise and improve access to and convenience of NHS services. Open 365 days a year most NHS Walk-in Centres are open from 7am to 10pm, Monday to Friday, and 9am to 10pm, Saturday and Sunday. They are situated in convenient locations that allow the local population quick and easy access to advice and treatment for minor ailments and injuries where no appointment is necessary. As well as providing a core service, the centres are helping to improve access for specific groups with particular needs, including young people, homeless people, students, refugees and asylum seekers.

  42 NHS walk-in centres are operational across the country, currently offering a service to around 11 million people.

  Since the first centre opened in 2000, the centres have seen 4 million people. On average each centre now sees around 100 patients a day.

  There are currently three walk-in centres serving the local populations of coalfield communities. These are located in St Helen's, Wakefield and Leigh.

  In recognition of the success of the WICs and of their potential to address specific local access issues, £40 million is being invested in new NHS walk-in centres over the next three years. They are being introduced to extend the level of choice for patients to access services, to reduce pressures on A&E and to help deliver better primary care access.

  11 new NHS walk-in centres are being developed to open in 2004. More will follow in 2004-05—2005-06.

Primary Care Workforce

  We are addressing inequities in primary care services with new ways of distributing resources to PCTs.

  From 2002-03 cash limited unified allocations have taken account of the distribution of non-cash limited spending on primary care services provided by GPs. So those areas who are spending less than their fair share on these services ("under-doctored areas") may get a larger increase for their other services. And if they are spending more than their fair share ("over-doctored areas") they may get a smaller increase.

  PCTs have also been given an average cash increase exceeding 30% over the three years 2003-06. None of the growth money has been identified for specific purposes. PCTs will be able to use these extra resources to deliver on both national and local priorities including recruiting additional staff in primary care.

  Under-doctored areas are getting extra training places and GPs going to work in those areas are entitled to receive a higher "Golden Hello Payment".

General Practitioners

Table 3

THE NUMBER OF GPS (EXCLUDING GP RETAINERS AND GP REGISTRARS) IN ENGLAND AND IN EACH COALFIELD COMMUNITY BY PCT AREA BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2001 AND MARCH 2003

GPs (excluding retainers and registrars) General Medical Practitioners for specified Primary Care Trusts


PCT
Sept 2001
March 2002
Sept 2002
March 2003

ENGLAND
28,802
28,950
29,202
29,709
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
151
149
145
157
Barnsley
120
122
119
117
Chesterfield
56
56
68
70
Derwentside
44
41
41
48
Doncaster Central
56
57
59
58
Doncaster East
46
46
43
43
Doncaster West
55
54
55
54
Durham and Chester-Le-Street
90
88
87
93
Durham Dales
54
53
52
57
Easington
54
51
53
58
East Kent Coastal
129
133
133
137
East Leeds
92
93
89
90
Eastern Wakefield
103
106
107
111
Halton
67
74
69
71
Hartlepool
47
48
49
51
Langbaurgh
60
61
60
62
Mansfield District
46
45
45
48
Middlesborough
113
111
114
114
North Eastern Derbyshire
78
78
81
85
North Stoke
73
71
63
63
North Tees
93
97
96
97
Northamptonshire Heartlands
142
139
147
145
Northumberland Care Trust
203
200
207
211
Rotherham
125
123
136
139
Sedgefield
54
51
53
54
South Leeds
81
82
81
86
South Stoke
60
57
66
68
St Helens
106
106
108
104
Wakefield West
95
98
101
98
West Cumbria
89
89
91
90

Note:
Data as at 31 March 2002-03, 30 September 2001-02

Source:
Department of Health General and Personal Medical Services Statistics


  Whole time equivalent (WTE) GPs (excluding GP retainers and GP registrars) per 100,000 weighted population:

  All PCT areas, which are below the England average of 55.55 are classed as under-doctored.

Table 4

THE NUMBER OF WTE GPS (EXCLUDING GP RETAINERS AND GP REGISTRARS) PER 100,000 WEIGHTED POPULATION AS AT MARCH 2003


PCT
GP per 100,000
PCT population

ENGLAND
55.55
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
45.48
Barnsley
42.69
Chesterfield
56.05
Derwentside
48.84
Doncaster Central
50.01
Doncaster East
44.35
Doncaster West
43.32
Durham and Chester-Le-Street
56.99
Durham Dales
58.60
Easington
46.66
East Kent Coastal
51.43
East Leeds
54.18
Eastern Wakefield
52.04
Halton
53.47
Hartlepool
49.19
Langbaurgh
51.20
Mansfield District
45.34
Middlesborough
51.81
North Eastern Derbyshire
48.85
North Stoke
40.70
North Tees
49.32
Northamptonshire Heartlands
51.58
Northumberland Care Trust
60.79
Rotherham
49.34
Sedgefield
49.74
South Leeds
51.66
South Stoke
44.38
St Helens
48.08
Wakefield West
57.95
West Cumbria
60.07


General Practitioner Registrars

Table 5

THE NUMBER OF GP REGISTRARS IN ENGLAND AND IN EACH COALFIELD COMMUNITY BY PCT AREA BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 2001 AND MARCH 2003

GP registrars for specified Primary Care Trusts


Numbers (headcount)
Primary Care Trust
Sept 2001
March 2002
Sept 2002
March 2003

ENGLAND
1,883
1,908
1,980
2,069
Ashton, Leigh and Wigan
4
4
6
6
Barnsley
8
6
6
8
Chesterfield
7
4
3
3
Derwentside
3
3
3
2
Doncaster Central
3
2
3
2
Doncaster East
4
3
4
4
Doncaster West
Durham and Chester-Le-Street
7
7
7
12
Durham Dales
3
1
5
3
Easington
1
1
2
East Kent Coastal
7
6
5
7
East Leeds
8
7
4
11
Eastern Wakefield
10
11
13
13
Halton
4
3
4
6
Hartlepool
2
2
3
4
Langbaurgh
2
2
1
1
Mansfield District
1
1
3
2
Middlesborough
4
4
5
4
North Eastern Derbyshire
7
3
5
4
North Stoke
2
3
3
3
North Tees
5
6
5
6
Northamptonshire Heartlands
9
9
8
10
Northumberland Care Trust
24
26
34
26
Rotherham
7
9
12
8
Sedgefield
5
3
6
6
South Leeds
5
4
3
3
South Stoke
St Helens
4
4
5
4
Wakefield West
5
7
7
7
West Cumbria
5
4
4
7

Data as at 31 March 2002-03, 30 September 2001-02

Source:
Department of Health General and Personal Medical Services Statistics



2.  WHY IS THE LEVEL OF DEPRIVATION ON THE COALFIELDS STILL SO HIGH, GIVEN THE VOLUME OF PUBLIC FUNDS INJECTED INTO THEM?

  "Tackling Health Inequalities—A Programme for Action" recognises that health inequalities are "persistent, stubborn and difficult to change". A step-change set of interventions are needed in order to cut into the cycle of deprivation that currently affects certain parts of the country, such as coalfield communities.

  Considerable investment has been made to help bring about this change. In his 2002 Budget, the Chancellor announced the largest sustained increase in funding of any five-year period in the history of the National Health Service (NHS). Over the years 2003-04 to 2007-08, these plans mean that expenditure on the NHS in England will increase on average by 7.4% a year over and above inflation—a total increase over the period of 43% in real terms. This will take the total spent on the NHS in England from £56 billion in 2002-03 to over £90 billion in 2007-08. This is a significant increase over historic levels of growth, eg compared with just 3.0% per annum under the previous administration.

  Table 6 shows the trends in mortality from all causes from 1990 to 2000, among ONS area classifications. The table shows that although there is not a big difference between the profiles of the different ONS area classifications, all cause mortality in coalfield areas has been falling more quickly in the last two years than all other areas except for "west inner London".



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 March 2004