Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Key messages from young people in Bradford (TiD 2001-2003)

  (a)  There is a general expression that they are "Bradfordians".

  (b)  Most like living in Bradford and feel they are part of the whole community.

  (c)  They also felt a loyalty to their particular community.

  (d)  To varying degrees they felt that the other community did not understand their community or their customs and culture.

  (e)  They blame outsiders for "stirring up trouble" (in 2001-02) but said that there were problems within the community(s) that had not been addressed which made it easy for the outsiders to cause problems.

  (f)  They identified institutional and social problems which were unresolved: racism, drugs, crime, Asian gangs, poverty, policing, segregated housing and schools.

  (g)  The responses by local authority and social agencies was criticised for reinforcing boundaries, barriers and stereotypes.

  (h)  One of the strongest messages was that young people in Bradford were in a "cycle of violence", where tit-for-tat, revenge attacks and reprisals were spiralling out of control. They expressed fear and anger at this situation and were clear that adult intervention was needed but that young people had to take responsibility and be in the forefront of any measures taken to break the cycle.

  (i)  There was a call for more mixed provision and services both within the school system and outside in youth clubs and centres.

  (j)  There was a worry that services and activities based in a particular area would only attract the predominant ethnic group from the area. They saw this as a somewhat insurmountable problem.

  (k)  They felt that there should be more organised activities like the TiD workshops but over a longer period of time and more sustained, residential and sports events were also suggested.

  (l)  They felt that schools generally had positive policies and practices towards community relations and provided a safe environment but did not always have answers and sometimes compounded the divisions in their community.

  (m)  Most wanted to accept and meet the challenge of creating cool communities as presented but while they accepted the challenge was theirs, they gave a clear message that they needed help, resources and direction to address the issues identified.

  The peer research and training team identified a number of factors:

  i.  Racism, prejudice and aggrievement was more apparent in those from low-income groups and those less educated.

  ii.  Young people, particularly Asian young people wanted opportunities to mix and get to know about each other's culture.

  iii.  Asian young people wanted to define themselves as either Asian or British but in this faced a dilemma wanting in some ways to be recognised as both. However they saw this as their problem and one which they had to work out.

  iv.  Black young people much more secure with a "Black British" identity but felt that they always suffered racism and disadvantage within in society, particularly in their education, the economy and in job market and more so than Asian people.

    "I was asking myself what they would do if they were with their mates and the group started to abuse a member of the other community. I feel they are ready to begin to make a positive contribution but they need training if they are to take it forward.

  Shahanaz Begum, Peer Researcher, Tolerance in Diversity Commenting on work with a TiD/Rainbow group in Oldham 2002





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 14 May 2004