Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 240-259)

9 FEBRUARY 2004

TONY HIRST OBE, MS PAULA GRIFFITHS, THE VERY REVD PETER JUDD AND PETER LONGMAN

  Q240 Andrew Bennett: You are really kidding us, are you not, that some of these old theatres actually offer people the sort of leg room and space they want and the sorts of toilets that are needed for a modern theatre?

  Mr Longman: It depends which one you go to. If you go to one that has been done up, like the Lyceum Theatre at Sheffield, you will find that sensitive architects were able to re-tier the thing to reduce the numbers of seats, which is often one of the things you have to do. Backstage you can rebuild the whole thing entirely—new stage, new dressing rooms, all of those things have happened at Hackney Empire and, thanks to an Arts Council grant, they applied for the site on the corner so there are extra toilets, there is a lift and disabled access the whole way through.

  Q241 Andrew Bennett: So how much is conservation and how much is really just opportunism to use an old building for a new function?

  Mr Longman: I have no doubt whatsoever that if you talked to those responsible at Hackney Empire they would not swap that building for anything because there is something magical and wonderful about the building.

  Q242 Andrew Bennett: But you have just told me that they have knocked down everything behind the stage.

  Mr Longman: I do not think the stages are usually the most historic, interesting bits. As I say, they were not intended to be kept in use for ever. They were utilitarian. It is the stage and backstage things that have changed and modernised most over the years. There is a problem about sight lines, there is a problem about knee-lengths, if you like, but a sensitive architect with an understanding of putting the right sorts of seats in can overcome those issues.

  Q243 Andrew Bennett: Are there not too many theatres, if you look round the country, that are trying to be preserved?

  Mr Longman: I would not say "theatres . . . trying to be preserved". If the question is, are there too many theatres in use, no, I do not think so. They will not all be in use for Arts Council subsidised expensive touring shows. Some of them, like Lancaster, which I mentioned, and Southsea, can be run by amateurs on a voluntary basis. A lot of local authorities like to run or have a theatre and there is still a thriving commercial sector as well.

  Q244 Andrew Bennett: You mentioned the one in Cardiff being handed over to being a pub. Do you see much more scope for theatres being converted in that way and being a cornerstone of regeneration?

  Mr Longman: I can give you plenty of examples of theatre buildings which are not currently in use, and I will write if it would be helpful. We call them sleeping beauties. They are fine buildings, they are still there. They may have a potential to come back but in the meantime they can serve a very useful role, whether it as a pub or a club or even a church in some instances.

  Q245 Mr O'Brien: Mr Hirst, your organisation is primarily concerned with industrial buildings—

  Mr Hirst: With inland waterways.

  Q246 Mr O'Brien: —and with works of engineering designed with a particular purpose in mind. How can their special interest be safeguarded with change of use?

  Mr Hirst: It has to be by the appropriate people who are in charge of the project and consulting people who have an interest.

  Q247 Mr O'Brien: You have not got any input into the future design of these buildings when they are handed over?

  Mr Hirst: Our organisation does not specifically do that. It can comment but it does not specifically have a direct input.

  Q248 Mr O'Brien: What we are looking at here is urban regeneration. Therefore, if we are to regenerate the urban areas and maintain the main principle of the buildings that we have inherited and the conservation of some of these civil engineering works, does IWAAC or some other body involved with these buildings have some input into the design?

  Mr Hirst: Yes, a lot of people have an input into its future function and that affects the design. The detailed design is achieved by making sure you get the right architect to do the work. The developers and the people who own the building, the people who are going to use the building, are the ones who write the specification. Part of the role of conservation officers and the people who are in charge of that aspect of things is to ensure that the integrity of the building is not destroyed.

  Q249 Mr O'Brien: How can the special interest be safeguarded then?

  Mr Hirst: By having the right people doing the right job.

  Q250 Mr O'Brien: And the skills? Are you satisfied that the right people are there and the skills are there?

  Mr Hirst: More often than not. Some restorations have not worked. A lot have and have been very successful and have kept the integrity but you can always raise the standards. This comes back to the bit about local authorities. We talked about conservation officers earlier. They have a key role in it.

  Q251 Mr O'Brien: In the town and city centres we have had wharves and wharving facilities and these are now being dispensed with to build domestic or other buildings. In the interests of urban regeneration is it a good thing to take the wharves away?

  Mr Hirst: I do not think you can make a general statement about it because it varies. There are an awful lot of wharves that have no potential future whatsoever as wharves and therefore it is not unreasonable to build on them. If you have a major building on one that is linked to the canal and you can find a waterway-linked use for it, that is the ideal, but it is not necessarily so and it may not be sustainable. If you say you can get rid of all wharves then you will get sterilisation and you will not get urban renewal. You have got to carefully pick and match what you want to do in generating income and a new centre to an area of urban renewal and maintaining the integrity of the structure and the waterway.

  Q252 Mr O'Brien: This is one way of getting materials into a town or city centre and reducing the amount of traffic that would be using the roads. Is that not part of the concern that you have?

  Mr Hirst: It is, and British Waterways have done that and there are new schemes starting.

  Q253 Mr O'Brien: Where have they done it?

  Mr Hirst: There is one down at Uxbridge where they are shifting gravel by water and there are plans for the Thames and other waterways. With the narrow waterways you have got very limited capacity to take heavy goods on the waterway at an economic price.

  Q254 Mr O'Brien: Any other examples?

  Mr Hirst: In Yorkshire there are an awful lot of examples of waterways being used extensively for freight traffic.

  Q255 Mr O'Brien: I am from Yorkshire but I cannot think of any.

  Mr Hirst: It is a growing and I am sure over the next few years there will be even more. British Waterways are being active in getting more.

  Q256 Andrew Bennett: Is not Gloucester an example of a bit of a muddle between conservation and trying to make the docks function there? It is all right—just say yes.

  Mr Hirst: I understand where you are coming from but I would not like to make a judgment because I have not been to Gloucester for a few years, so it would be unfair to do so.

  Q257 Andrew Bennett: Let me go on to the question of church buildings. The Committee went to Norwich recently and there are great claims in Norwich that Norwich has got more medieval churches than almost anywhere else in Britain, and yet 80% of them you could not go in to look at the architecture. Is that not a disgrace?

  Ms Griffiths: It is a shame, is it not? I think quite a lot of the ones you went to see were probably redundant rather than churches in use. There is a lot more that needs to be done between local authorities and church authorities. Again, picking up the education, in a place like Norwich there is tremendous potential for using the buildings as a reason for people to go to that place and to understand and learn about it. I would hope that there could be encouragement for them to work more closely together. I referred earlier to the Churches Conservation Trust, which is the national body which looks after 330-odd redundant churches. The ones you saw in Norwich would not be looked after by that body. The Churches Conservation Trust have been working very hard to increase access and visitors and the work of the community on the churches which they look after, and in the past few years that has made quite a difference to their own churches.

  Q258 Andrew Bennett: And churchyards? Are they really designed for winos and other people to hang out in?

  Ms Griffiths: Again, that is a question of working with the local authority, is it not? Churchyards are terrifically important spaces; that is right. Again, they can give a very negative message if they are not looked after and are inhabited by winos. It is important to work together. Again, in Norwich, some work has been done, and in Ipswich some work has been done in looking at churchyards and putting some money towards them. I agree that more needs to be done.

  Q259 Mr Cummings: May I address this question to the Church Heritage Forum? In your evidence you point to a number of impressive church-led community projects. Do you think that you could have more projects if local churches were to work more closely with other agencies based at a strategic level, for example, local authorities, local primary care trusts, child care organisations?

  Ms Griffiths: I am sure there are lots of examples. We quoted in the paper St John's, Hoxton, which was an example of an early 19th century church which ten years ago was creeping with dry rot and desperately in need of renovation. It has now been restored with English Heritage and Heritage Lottery Fund money and there is a children's nursery in the body of the church itself and there is a computer centre and a gym for disabled people in the crypt. That is great, and again that symbol of despair has become a real symbol of hope. I am sure there is potential. It is a question of breaking through the suspicion which sometimes is found with local authorities that the church is different from the rest of the community and that the church is perhaps there to proselytise.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 29 July 2004