Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Written Evidence


Memorandum by The Architectural Heritage Fund (HIS 31)

INTRODUCTION

  1.  The Architectural Heritage Fund (AHF) is a registered charity, limited by guarantee, established in 1976 to promote the conservation and sustainable re-use of historic buildings in the UK. It does this by providing advice, information and financial assistance in the form of grants and low-interest working capital loans for projects undertaken by building preservation trusts (BPTs) and other charities. BPTs are charitable organisations made up of local volunteers and established with the specific object of rescuing historic buildings by repairing and converting them for viable new uses. To date the AHF has offered grants totalling over £3.5 million and working capital loans of almost £73 million and through the work of BPTs and other charities has enabled the rescue of almost 1,000 historic buildings. This work has acted as a catalyst for environmental, social and economic regeneration and is increasingly a key part of many wider regeneration schemes. Alongside other larger heritage organisations, the AHF is a major contributor to the revival or our historic towns and cities.

  2.  As acknowledged in the urban white paper, Our Towns and Cities: the future—Delivering an Urban Renaissance, historic buildings make a great contribution to the character, quality and sense of identity of urban areas[13] The historic buildings around us, whether individually, as a streetscape or an entire neighbourhood, create and add to our experience of the urban environment, defining the character of a place and adding social and economic value. As well as connecting us to our past, they maintain physical continuity of the urban fabric and familiarity with our local environment.

THE CONTRIBUTION OF HISTORIC BUILDINGS TO URBAN REGENERATION

  3.  There are numerous well-known examples of urban regeneration schemes with historic buildings at their heart. In many of these cases, it is the historic buildings that have acted as a catalyst for wider regeneration around them, reviving areas of towns and cities suffering from abandonment and neglect, economic under-investment and physical blight. Attracting millions of visitors each year, the revitalised historic Albert Dock in Liverpool is just one element of the much wider regeneration of the city which after a period of decline, is now enjoying economic growth, rising house prices and greater demographic stability. The creative re-use of historic warehouse buildings alongside good quality new design in central areas of the city such as the Rope Walks is attracting people back to live in a previously run-down and decaying part of Liverpool. This area has become a vibrant and exciting part of the city and the re-use of historic buildings has been a major factor in its success.

  4.  Grainger Town in Newcastle is another well-known example of urban regeneration with historic buildings as a major factor in its success. Grainger Town was built during the 1830s and 1840s and for many years was a prosperous area. Architecturally and aesthetically, the area is unified and the buildings define its character—40% of these are listed buildings. The area declined to a point in the late 1980s where over a million square feet of floor space was unoccupied and 50% of the listed buildings were at risk. This situation has now been reversed and Grainger Town has once again become a popular place to live and work. By December 2000, 35 historic buildings had been brought back into use, 290 homes were created and 141 businesses were established in the area, providing almost 400 jobs.

  5.  On a slightly lesser scale, a project carried out by the Glasgow BPT has had a major impact on its surrounding area and is a good example of conservation-led regeneration. St Andrew's in the Square, a Category A listed church, was made redundant due to a declining population in a largely abandoned and derelict area. The BPT purchased the church and oversaw its complete restoration and revitalisation as a performance venue and cafe. The square surrounding St Andrews, now no longer blighted by the empty church but enhanced by this unique facility, has been brought back to life. The square has been rebuilt as social and private housing and the Director of the BPT has estimated that the St Andrew's project has levered in some £54 million of public and private sector funding. This is a regeneration project that has a historic building physically at its centre and as a major catalyst for new development.

  6.  Similarly, a project carried out by the Buildings at Risk Trust in Snow Hill, Wolverhampton, has had a catalytic effect on its surroundings and has stimulated the wider regeneration of the run-down St John's area. The Trust took on part of a terrace that was being used for residential and retail use but was neglected and partly derelict. After restoration the properties were sold back into local ownership and the same uses continued but again, the buildings have been brought back to life, are lived and worked in and are used by the local community. The catalytic effect is seen in the general lifting of the area and its environment, as rising property values encourage adjacent owners to reverse the neglect of their own properties, and the quality of life there steadily improves.

PARTNERSHIPS AND COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT

  7.  Historic buildings, particularly when at risk, have long inspired and motivated local communities to act to protect and revive these valuable assets and areas of distinctive local character. A major aspect of the AHF's work is to guide such communities and give advice on how they can form a BPT to help conserve their historic built environment. BPTs represent local communities and express their views on how their towns and cities should look, be treated and be used. In bringing historic buildings back into use, the success of BPT projects generates civic pride, builds community capacity to undertake civic projects of all kinds, develops skills within the community and fosters sustainable development objectives as well as a sense of place.

  Historic building projects led by BPTs or other charities can lever in substantial funding from various sources not otherwise accessible to more mainstream regeneration schemes. Incorporating the historic building/charitable element into such schemes makes financial and practical sense.

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT

  8.  Historic buildings also have an important role to play in developing sustainable communities. One requirement of the government's plan for sustainable development is that buildings minimise the use of resources at construction and over time. Historic buildings represent embodied energy and to recycle them is to capitalise on investment and energy that has already been expended. Demolition of such structures is therefore an extremely wasteful exercise, particularly when followed by new-build. Recent research carried out by the Building Research Establishment has shown that a typical Victorian house contains energy equivalent to 15,000 litres of petrol[14] When set in these terms, it is clear that urban regeneration schemes should not just be about creative new design but should always include historic buildings for their positive impact on the natural environment and our finite energy sources.

PROPERTY VALUES

  9.  A recent study carried out by English Heritage and the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors established that listed office buildings achieved a higher total return on investment than more modern developments, supporting the idea that the attractiveness and character of a historic environment can generate higher investment. Liverpool, already described above, recently saw the sale of its first £1 million pound property in the city centre, a real sign of its revitalisation.

FISCAL AND LEGISLATIVE CHANGES

  10.  The change that is most urgently required is to introduce a lower flat rate of VAT on repairs and alterations and to harmonise the rate of VAT for all building work—VAT is currently charged on repairs to buildings but not on new-build and, even more perversely, alterations to listed buildings are free of VAT but repairs are not. At present, therefore, the VAT system acts as a powerful disincentive for owners to maintain their properties and for the repair of neglected historic buildings for reuse. As it stands, the system flies in the face of the government's sustainability agenda as well as counteracting the contribution that re-using historic buildings can play in urban regeneration.

  Until the outcome of the current review of the designation regime is known it is difficult to comment more specifically, but many in the heritage sector are particularly disturbed by the suggestion that economic considerations should affect decisions on whether a building should be statutorily listed as being of special architectural or historic interest. Our strongly-held view is that economic considerations may be relevant to applications for consent but are irrelevant to designation.

GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS

  11.  Although it is clear that government accepts that historic buildings have a role to play in urban regeneration to some degree, it is also clear that the sector could and should receive much more support than it currently enjoys. To quote a few examples:

    —  The Treasury is reluctant to support much-needed changes to the VAT system.

    —  The DCMS has proposed making deductions from the HLF's current balance in the National Lottery Distribution Fund which will damage its extremely valuable work across the board and will have particular impact on its highly-regarded Townscape Heritage Initiative schemes that have done so much to contribute to urban regeneration.

    —  The ODPM firmly backs Community Development Trusts (CDTs) but BPTs, which have much in common with CDTs, do not get the recognition or financial support that they deserve.

CONCLUSION

  12.  The AHF welcomes the opportunity to highlight its role and that of BPTs in the contribution that the built heritage can make to urban regeneration. It is clear that historic buildings have a major part to play as catalysts to wider development and as core elements of regeneration schemes and that, with the right support at all levels of government, those organisations working in this sector can make a significant difference to the quality of life of people throughout the UK.




13   DETR (2000), 72. Back

14   English Heritage, Heritage Counts 2003-the State of England's Historic Environment 2003, 44. Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 26 January 2004