Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380 - 384)

UESDAY 13 JULY 2004

RT HON KEITH HILL MP, MS DAWN EASTMEAD AND MR JOHN STAMBOLLOUIAN

  Q380  Chairman: Six months from 27 May. Is that right?

  Ms Eastmead: Yes, that is correct.

  Q381  Chairman: What about employers, particularly the Government or government contracts? In Greater Manchester at the moment there is a lot of widening work going on on the M60 and it appears that a fair number of Travellers are doing the work on that site. It appears that the employer or the Government has no duty to provide sites for the Travellers who are working on that site so they just end up on any neighbouring local authority's land. Would it not be reasonable, where contracts have been let by the Government and perhaps other big construction companies, to make sure that they have a duty to provide suitable caravan sites for people who might be doing the work?

  Keith Hill: I am disinclined to go down that path, Mr Chairman. It does seem to me that if you say you are going to do this for the Gypsy and Traveller employees then it does raise the question why are you not doing it for anybody else who happens to come in—as I am sure is often the case—from outside to construction projects.

  Q382  Chairman: In the past big construction projects almost always made temporary sites available for people who were coming in to do construction work. It appears that that practice has disappeared perhaps to save money.

  Keith Hill: That may well be the case, but I cannot say that this one is an issue that has been put to us with any urgency. This would be a matter for the Highways Agency of course and it might well be worth your while putting that particular question to them. And the best of luck, if I might say so!

  Q383  Chairman: I thought you had sorted them out in your previous role! Trading Standards: it is alleged that some Gypsies do a fair amount of work on paths and tree-cutting and things like that, some of which is not up to standard. Are you happy that Trading Standards pursue bad workmanship among Traveller communities?

  Keith Hill: I am very conscious of the issue of courage in these exchanges, but I have to say somewhat feebly that that really is not the responsibility of the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister; it is, I would imagine, a matter for DTI.

  Q384  Chairman: On that note can I thank you very much for your attendance.

  Keith Hill: It has been my usual pleasure.







 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 8 November 2004