Select Committee on Office of the Deputy Prime Minister: Housing, Planning, Local Government and the Regions Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum by English Partnerships (EP)

NEW TOWNS—TRANSFER OF ASSETS

  Please provide a note to the Committee regarding the work of the Transfer Asset Team and the progress they have made. In addition please supply a list of transfer plans that have been submitted with the Treasury and their progress.

  Following the Committee's Report on New Towns and the Government response in November 2002, EP has responded with a complete change in approach, as I set out in my answer to the Committee on 14 June (Q63). This was reflected in the very positive adjournment debate on 27 February 2003 on the New Towns report.

  In addition to taking forward my own very positive discussions on our investment priorities in the new towns, as I stated in my evidence, we now have a dedicated team with responsibility for dealing with EP's non-strategic assets and we have embarked on a rolling programme of transfers over the next three years.

  We have already agreed and transferred a schedule of assets with Warrington Borough Council, and concluded negotiations on a package with Halton Borough Council. These packages have consisted of assets having community benefit (CRAs). We have also begun discussions with Bracknell, Crawley, Sunderland and Preston. Subject to the satisfactory conclusion of discussions with the prospective transferees, submissions to ODPM will follow.

  And looking wider than new town assets, we have also successfully transferred two packages of assets in Liverpool South Docks and the Wirral (ex-Merseyside UDC land) to British Waterways.

  In addition, on clawback and how to fund the problems of new town maintenance, the Government response to the Committee's New Town Report said "Government is not prepared to give up clawback or sales receipts as a general principle." It goes on ". . . in some circumstances and with the agreement of Treasury, EP might waive clawback or transfer the right to receive clawback to the relevant local authority".

  We are continuing to work with Treasury and ODPM on both transfer issues and clawback to develop a model on which to base future transfers.

  As I said in my evidence Treasury (and indeed ODPM for considerably longer) have been aware of the need for a model for such transfers for a year now. I am pleased to say that we have recently presented our worked up proposals to the Treasury team in April of this year, based on the Warrington model.

  I hope to be able to update the Committee with further positive progress on this issue.

COALFIELD COMMUNITIES

  English Partnerships has always had a commitment for the wider social and economic regeneration of the Coalfield areas. The National Coalfield Programme was set up to deal with the economic, social and environmental regeneration in the former Coalfield Communities. The Programme was initially site led and focused but with the additional flexibility from Government allowing EP and its partners to invest outside the sites with an aim to directly invest in the communities for wider social and economic regeneration.

  The recently published Government Response to the Select Committee report outlines some of EP's work in delivering social and economic regeneration, as did our original memorandum of evidence to the Committee as part of their inquiry. We recognise that there is still a great deal of work to be done and we are approaching this through the present Business/Corporate Planning process to identify, with key stakeholders (RDAs, Coalfields Communities Campaign, Local Authorities) our interventions.

  EP will still largely concentrate on its core business of providing physical and social infrastructure, sites, property, housing and well designed space but ensuring the longer term links and planning are in place with organisations such as the Learning and Skills Council, Small Business Service, Job Centre Plus, Neighbourhood Renewal etc to ensure the infrastructure comes on stream alongside skills, training and enterprise programmes which are designed to best fit the communities they are aiming to regenerate.

  This is being done at a number of levels. At the national level, as noted in the Government response, ODPM and EP are in discussion with RDA chairs to clarify.

  Also at the national/regional level, our Regional Business Plans are identifying key priorities with the coalfields being key in hose relevant regions and these will feed into the Corporate Plan. Our work on the mapping of the low demand areas and discussion with Regional Housing Boards will also support wider social regeneration.

  The roving team within the Coalfields Regeneration Trust, welcomed by the earlier Select Committee and funded by English Partnerships, charged with increasing the degree of linkage between investment on sites and community outcomes including community enterprise and training and is now increasing its impetus.

  At the project level we will learn lessons and apply them elsewhere from innovative schemes such as those developed through our involvement in the Selby Coalfields Task Force. This showed the potential additional benefit of linking the bringing forward of sites to the activities of JobCentre Plus, Learning Skills Council and Business Link.

  It is making these links at all levels and ensuring the support comes in at the right time and right level will be key to ensuring the wider economic, social and environmental regeneration of the coalfield areas.

URC MEMBERSHIP/ATTENDANCE

  We undertook to provide further detail on our membership and attendance on the Urban Regeneration Companies in England in which we are a partner. Although the individual Board membership has changed in a number of changes as a result of senior staff recruitment mentioned in our evidence, the following list shows that all representatives are at either Regional/Executive Director level or Area Director level within EP, as follows:
Bradford Centre Regeneration David Carr (Area Director—Yorkshire)
Cambourne-Pool-Redruth RegenerationDavid Warburton (Area Director—SE/SW)
Catalyst CorbyTrevor Beattie (Corporate Strategy Director)
Derby CityscapeDennis Hone (Regional Director—East Midlands/East England/Milton Keynes)
Gloucester HeritageDuncan Innes (Regional Director—Southern)
Hull CitybuildTrevor Beattie (Corporate Strategy Director)
Leicester Regeneration Company David Hughes (Area Director—East Midlands)
Liverpool VisionPaul Spooner (Regional Director—NW/WM)
New East ManchesterPaul Spooner (Regional Director—NW/WM)
Regenco (Sandwell)Sarah Lord (Area Director—Birmingham, Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Herefordshire)
Sheffield OneDavid Carr (Area Director—Yorkshire)
Sunderland arcNeil Bradbury (Regional Director—North East/Yorkshire)
The New Swindon CompanyDuncan Innes (Regional Director—Southern)
Tees Valley RegenerationNeil Bradbury (Regional Director—North East/Yorkshire)
Walsall Regeneration CompanySarah Lord (Area Director—Birmingham, Warwickshire, Worcestershire and Herefordshire)
West Lakes RenaissancePaul Spooner (Regional Director—North West/West Midlands)


  Should the above named Member not be available to attend we make every effort to ensure that a senior level substitute who has an understanding of the local issues is able to attend each Board Meeting. With the exception of Trevor Beattie who has overall responsibility for URCs as a national programme for EP and has been on the two URC Boards named since they were created all of the above named staff have been recruited into these senior roles over the course of the last 12 months and only rarely do we field a substitute."

REGIONAL HOUSING BOARD ATTENDANCE MEMBERSHIP

  On the Committee's questioning relating to the enquiry on the role of the Housing Corporation, we were questioned on EP's contribution to the Regional Housing Boards (Q483).

  The following list shows the EP representatives on those Boards.
North WestPaul Spooner (Regional Director—North West/West Midlands)
West MidlandsPaul Spooner
North EastNeil Bradbury (Regional Director—North East/Yorkshire)
Yorkshire/HumbersideNeil Bradbury
East MidlandsPeter Spingett (Area Director—Northampton) to be succeeded by Dennis Hone (Regional Director—East Midlands/East England/Milton Keynes) from July
Eastern EnglandDennis Hone
LondonDuncan Innes (Regional Director—Southern)
South EastTrevor Beattie (Corporate Strategy Director)
South WestDavid Warburton (Area Director—South East/South West)


  As for URC Boards, should the above named Member not be available to attend we make every effort to ensure that a senior level substitute who has an understanding of the issues is able to attend. Because we have only recently recruited into a number of senior posts within our London/Southern and North East teams we have not always been able to field an EP representative for those three Boards. Now those posts are filled that will not happen in future. As I hope I conveyed to the Committee, we take our role on both URC and RHBs very seriously."

PROJECT EXPENDITURE BY NEW TOWN

  The Committee asked about our investment in each of the new towns over the last 12 months. This is as follows:
New Town2003-04 £
Aycliffe6,106
Bracknell289,019
Basildon2,818,691
Corby19,981
Central Lancashire2,470,901
Crawley425,370
Hatfield1,025,608
Hemel Hempstead209,184
Harlow532,146
Milton Keynes24,029,258
Northampton10,230,381
Peterborough1,849,547
Runcorn2,223,749
Skelmersdale189,154
Stevenage1,738,811
Telford7,432,450
Welwyn Garden City206,785
Warrington6,862,557
Washington173,143
62,732,840





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 18 August 2004