Select Committee on Public Accounts Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 80-99)

Monday 15 December 2003

Mr Mike Eland, Mr Len Morris, and Mr Kevin Franklin

  Q80 Mr Steinberg: By how many?

  Mr Eland: We have changed the way in which—

  Q81 Mr Steinberg: By how many?

  Mr Eland: About 3,000.

  Q82 Mr Steinberg: Three thousand extra people working now.

  Mr Eland: The original contract was signed on the basis that we would be declining in numbers. It was due to go down to 18,000 and we are now 22,000.

  Q83 Mr Steinberg: How did you get it so wrong then?

  Mr Eland: It was not a question of getting it wrong. It was a question of change in policy which brought those additional people in.

  Q84 Mr Steinberg: You certainly did not get it right because you have 3,000 extra people in.

  Mr Eland: It was because of a change of policy that we brought those additional people in, not that we got it wrong. It was not that we got it wrong.

  Q85 Mr Steinberg: If that is getting it right, heaven knows what getting it wrong is like.

  Mr Eland: We were working on one set of plans when we originally signed the contract. Policy changes since then have led to us expanding.

  Q86 Mr Steinberg: So because you expanded the number of staff, because you got it wrong in the first place, it has cost the taxpayer something like £500 million. That sounds pretty typical of the PFIs we have come to expect and love in this Committee. I have to be a little sceptical about using the internet anyway for banking issues or issues which have anything to do with money and I certainly would not want to do it. In my view, it is going to be a very difficult task to get people to go on and do their VAT over the internet. What rather amused me was that there is talk about making it compulsory to register on the internet to pay your VAT, is that right?

  Mr Eland: We will look at whether we will make it mandatory in some areas or for certain sizes of business.

  Q87 Is it right that if they get it wrong on the internet then they are penalised?

  Mr Eland: No.

  Q88 Mr Steinberg: It is what it says in the Report.

  Mr Eland: No. If you put in a wrong VAT return, then we would take action against that whether you did it manually or electronically.

  Q89 Mr Steinberg: What happens if it breaks down? What happens if somebody is putting in their VAT return and the internet breaks down and they cannot get it in on time?

  Mr Eland: We would accept an alternative routing.

  Q90 Mr Steinberg: They would not be penalised.

  Mr Eland: Not if it was not their fault. Just recently with the postal strike we suspended penalties because we knew people could not get their returns in.

  Q91 Mr Steinberg: How many people do you think are actually going to take it up eventually?

  Mr Eland: We are looking to get 50% take-up by March 2006 and we would like to get something like 80% taken up by the end of 2010.

  Q92 Mr Steinberg: Just remind us how many have taken it up to now?

  Mr Eland: Four thousand.

  Q93 Mr Steinberg: Just remind us whether it is working properly at the moment.

  Mr Eland: We have not introduced the new service on which we are basing our take-up strategy.

  Q94 Mr Steinberg: How late is it?

  Mr Eland: It is not; it is about two or three months now behind when we had wanted to introduce it, but that is because, in line with this Committee's own report, we are taking the testing of these projects extremely seriously and we are not going to inflict on taxpayers—

  Q95 Mr Steinberg: What percentage of take-up makes the investment worthwhile?

  Mr Eland: Our business case is based on us getting the 50% take-up.

  Q96 Mr Steinberg: You have to get 50% before it is worthwhile.

  Mr Eland: Yes, I believe that is so.

  Q97 Mr Steinberg: It gets into profit after 50%.

  Mr Eland: That depends on whether you are looking at the efficiency savings or the revenue. The revenue is actually less sensitive to take-up. A lot of that is about us getting the information to equip our offices. The efficiency savings are dependent on take-up.

  Q98 Mr Steinberg: Mr Allan asked about incentives and you said you were thinking about incentives. You do a lot of thinking, do you not, but you do not seem to do much action? You are just thinking of incentives and the thing has been going since 1999.

  Mr Eland: No.

  Q99 Mr Steinberg: You are just thinking about incentives. I would have thought you should have been thinking about incentives right from the beginning. What incentives do you hope to introduce? How are you going to make somebody like me, who has no confidence in the internet, not that it does not work but have no confidence in myself being able to use it? How are you going to persuade me that it is worthwhile sending in a VAT form over the internet?

  Mr Eland: We are going to offer a business which wants to do that, a range of much better information which they can get in a more accessible fashion. We are going to offer them the ability to use search engines to find the answers to questions quickly.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 20 May 2004