1 On negotiating the Memoranda
1. In May 2001, Microsoft announced new licensing
arrangements to operate worldwide from August 2002, which OGC,
departments and local authorities estimated would cost an additional
£40 million to £60 million per year. In response OGC
started negotiations with Microsoft to secure more favourable
terms.[2] Initially the
company was unwilling to negotiate with OGC and it took five months
to conclude a Memorandum of Understanding. Fundamental to achieving
a deal was the willingness of the wider public sector, including
local authorities and the devolved administrations, to co-operate
with OGC during negotiations.[3]
2. OGC subsequently secured similar agreements with
Sun Microsystems, Lotus/IBM, Corel and Oracle. OGC estimated that
if the public sector took advantage of these Memoranda, there
would be a total saving of some £100 million in the three
years from March 2002 through a combination of direct price reductions,
productivity improvements and efficiency gains and that most of
the saving would be generated by the deal with Microsoft. By January
2003 the Memoranda had already saved £31 million in direct
price reductions mainly from Microsoft.[4]
OGC estimated the direct price savings achieved as £49 million
at the end of September 2003 (Figure 2). The initial estimate
of the savings of £100 million was low because there was
no precedent in the public sector of such a deal. Given the fast
moving nature of the software market, OGC believed there was a
basis for looking at the Memoranda again. OGC have opened up discussions
with Microsoft to see whether they can obtain further improvements
in the Memorandum.[5]Figure
2: OGC's estimates of direct price reductions
| Date
| Direct price reductions |
OGC's estimate of the savings to be achieved for the public sector as a whole
| March 2002- March 2005 |
£36 million |
OGC's estimate of the savings achieved for the public sector as a whole
| By January 2003 | £31 million
|
OGC's estimate of the savings achieved for the public sector as a whole
| By September 2003 | £49 million
|
Source: Office of Government Commerce
3. Microsoft requires its customers not to reveal
to third parties the level of discount they receive. Purchasers
are therefore unable to determine whether the price being offered
is better than those for other customers.[6]
OGC obtains market intelligence from a number of sources to assess
the worth of the Memoranda, but considered it difficult to compare
them with other agreements offered to large corporations who could
commit upfront to the purchase of large volumes of software. The
Memoranda, by contrast, offer no guarantees about purchase volumes,
since these would depend on the procurement decisions of individual
departments.[7]
2 C&AG's Report, para 1.13 Back
3
Qq 3, 33 Back
4
C&AG's Report, paras 7, 1.16 Back
5
Qq 1, 3, 5 Back
6
C&AG's Report, para 1.15 Back
7
Qq 6-8 Back
|