Select Committee on Public Administration Written Evidence


Memorandum by James A Gilman (HON 36)

YOUTH HONOURS

  I see from the national press that your Committee is currently engaged in considering ways in which the nation's honours system might be revised, and has invited replies from the general public to proposals outlined in your recent consultation paper. May I take the liberty of inviting Committee Members to consider, additionally, the question of the value of instituting a system of "Youth Honours"? In this context, may I invite your consideration of the attached proposal which, in the past, I have submitted both to the Prime Minister's Office and that of HRH the Prince of Wales, with interest having been expressed in both quarters but no action proposed.

I should be happy to discuss this with any and all interested parties. As an indication of my involvement with young people, may I add that I am Director of a European Youth Initiative—Europa—Youth—which was established in Wales in 1992 with the support of The European Commission.

A NATIONAL YOUTH HONOURS SYSTEM

A Proposal

  The letters "OBE", "GCMG", "VC" and the like appended to the surnames of deserving adults all reward and recall individual lives distinguished by service, bravery or merit. A highly significant element of such awards is that they are a visible public testimony to the latter, drawing attention to the achievements of their respective recipients. No such means exist, however, of rewarding, and of publicly proclaiming the comparable achievements gained by young people, as opposed to their adult counterparts.

  Yet young people often deserve, through their actions at a time of crisis or their example over a period of time, public recognition of that action or that example, by means of an award testifying to their achievement. Moreover, given that young people are still in their formative period of growth en route towards accepting adult responsibilities, this generation would in many cases benefit even more from the public acknowledgement, and the spur towards even greater achievements, that such a reward would represent than would adults for whom such a distinction more often crowns a lifetime of achievement rather than marking the first, most vital step towards such a lifetime of distinguished works or actions.

  It is true that ways and means already exist of awarding deserving young people; but one essential factor is missing from all such award schemes: the kind of distinguishing external and public testimony to their achievements that accompanies such awards made to adults, viz.: the addition of an appropriate set of initials after the recipient's name, publicly testifying throughout their life to the honour accorded them.

  What we should like to suggest is an Honours System for young people aged under 25. In its simplest form, this might consist of an award made to young people who had in some way made a positive contribution to society through their own individual actions, and would incorporate the award of some designation to be added to the recipient's name, as a public testimony to their achievement and the distinction conferred upon them. Such an award could have a major impact upon the lives of many young people, leading them to commit themselves even more positively to their own personal development and to some form of service to their local community.

  The precise title of such a distinction is a matter for further consideration. One contender might perhaps, I would suggest, be something like "Challenger", denoting both that the recipient has accepted the challenge to make a positive contribution to society and that he or she is throwing down their own challenge to society, to make positive use of whatever that person has to offer in the way of commitment, talent, or enthusiasm,. An example of such usage in practice might be the following:

  John Anthony Smith, Chgr.

  Jenny Robinson, Chgr.

  Another possibility might be the title "Squire", to be signified by the use of the initials "Sqr" placed after the recipient's name, viz: John Anthony Smith, Sqr. As an honourable and historic term used in the past for a young man in service with a knight who might, in the course of time, expect to become a knight himself, such a title carries with it precisely that connotation of service and of chivalry, coupled with a worthiness qualifying the bearer for public approbation, that one might wish such an honour to indicate. There would, of course, be a similar and equivalent title for young women.

  Furthermore, such a Youth Honours System might not be confined solely to within the borders of the UK, but could be extended throughout the whole of Europe. The introduction of such a system would reflect the ideal of Britain's moral leadership of Europe to which Government has given its support in the course of many speeches.

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 13 July 2004