Select Committee on Public Administration Written Evidence


Memorandum by M J Williams (HON 39)

  I read in The Times of today's date that you are to head an inquiry into the honours system. This review is long overdue.

  The present system should not and cannot be allowed to continue. This system of handouts from those on high to those who have towed the line or financially lubricated the workings of a [party] machine must stop. It brings the whole system into disrepute and belittles the recognition of those many deserving cases.

  I am interested in ceramics and a few years ago was reading about the life of a great Japanese master potter—Shoji Hamada—who in 1955 was recognised in Japan as a Living National Treasure. What a wonderful and meaningful title. Anyone worldwide on hearing that would immediately understand its meaning.

  My proposal to you is that we adopt an identical term for recognising those in the arts. This would allow not only individuals but also small groups to be recognised. It would allow The Rolling Stones, as a group, to be recognised as a Living National Treasure instead of Sir Mick having recognition and the other Stones to be ignored. I will not mention here what I think of Jagger for accepting this crumb from the top table.

For someone in the arts to be made a Sir, Dame, MBE is meaningless. What was it given for? Services to their industry, support for their political party (if Baldrick ever gets anything) etc.

February 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 13 July 2004