Select Committee on Treasury Fifth Report


1 Introduction

1. There are around 8.5 million endowment mortgages. These were generally taken out in the 1980s and 1990s. Endowment mortgage holders have a mortgage which does not reduce over a period of years but which has to be paid off in one go at the end of its term, using the proceeds of a separate low-cost 'endowment' with-profits insurance policy intended to cover at least the amount of the mortgage. But 80% of endowment mortgage policies are now unlikely to pay enough to cover the amount of the mortgage they were originally linked to. The average shortfall on such policies is currently around £5,500, implying that endowment mortgages are already a near £40 billion problem, but the shortfalls are likely to grow and the problems could intensify until 2013, the peak year for endowment policies reaching maturity.

2. Some policyholders will have other funds with which to repay the mortgage or will have made plans to cope with the shortfall in other ways. 4.5 million policyholders, with between them 6.8 million separate policies, are nevertheless still relying on their endowment policies to repay their mortgage. A large number of these policyholders—and many have written to the Committee and to other members of the House—face the possibility of serious financial difficulty. In extreme cases, they may even have to sell their home.

3. This situation has to some extent been brought about by the recent poor investment climate, in particular the stock market falls of 2000-2003, which have depressed the investment performance of endowment policies. But in many ways this masks underlying problems for which the life insurance industry must take the blame. These problems include:

  • questions about the basic design of endowment mortgages
  • asset allocation policy
  • issues over mis-selling of policies
  • inadequate communication with customers (policyholders)
  • inadequate handling of complaints.

4. This Report has arisen as part of our wider inquiry into Restoring confidence in long-term savings. This wider inquiry was announced in November 2003 and we stated at the time the inquiry would include an examination of the problems relating to endowment mortgages. Although questioning touching on endowment mortgages was included in our early evidence sessions in the wider inquiry, we decided to devote three early evidence sessions specifically to this issue. These were with:—

  • a range of consumer groups (Consumers' Association, Citizens Advice,[1] Financial Services Consumer Panel) (2 December 2003)
  • the Financial Services Authority and the Financial Ombudsman Service (2 December 2003), and
  • Chief Executives of five leading endowment mortgage provider companies (Aviva,[2] Legal and General, Prudential, Royal & Sun Alliance, and Standard Life) (27 January 2004).

Following these sessions, we decided that it would be appropriate to produce a separate Report on the endowment mortgage issue alone, ahead of the main Report on long-term savings.[3] Not only do we feel that the issue is both important and urgent, we feel that there are important lessons from this issue which help to inform the wider Inquiry.

5. In this Report we look first at the concept of endowment mortgages and some of the problems associated with them. We then follow through the issues as they have developed, covering the mis-selling of endowment mortgages and then the current state of play on the shortfalls being faced by policy holders and the advice being given to them. We also look at the complaints and compensation process for those who may have been mis-sold policies and who are facing a shortfall as a result. Finally, we draw some broad conclusions as to possible lessons for the future.


1   National Association of Citizens Advice Bureaux Back

2   Aviva's life insurance business trades in the UK as Norwich Union. Back

3   The oral and written evidence received on endowment mortgages is not readily separable from the evidence received for the wider long-term savings inquiry as a whole. The oral evidence taken so far is available in one volume as HC (2003-04) 71: this incorporates HC (2002-03) 1274-i (evidence of 11 November 2003) and HC (2003-04) 71-i,-ii,-iii (evidence of 2 December 2003, 22 January 2004 and 27 January 2004). The written evidence taken so far is published in one volume as HC (2003-04) 275 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 11 March 2004