Select Committee on Treasury Eighth Report


1 Introduction

The issue

1. Long-term savings—in the form of pensions or other savings—are a fundamental part of the financial security of the population. It is important both for savers as individuals and for the economy as a whole that the level of savings—and the industry that manages them—should be in a healthy state. Yet a number of recent events have shown that all is not well and confidence in savings and the savings industry is at a low ebb. In our earlier report, in March, on endowment mortgages we concluded "There is an overriding need to rebuild public trust and confidence in many of the companies that currently dominate the long-term savings industry."[1]

2. The contributory factors include some developments into which this Committee has already conducted inquiries, such as the problems at Equitable Life[2] and the issues that have arisen in the split capital investment trust sector.[3] But we decided in the course of 2003 that a wider examination was called for. Accordingly in November 2003 we announced this inquiry, under the title Restoring confidence in long-term savings, indicating that we would particularly welcome evidence on the 'savings gap', marketing practices and costs in the industry, the means of provision of unbiased financial advice, asset allocation policies in the life insurance industry, problems relating to specific products (such as endowment mortgages and precipice bonds[4]), and the role of the regulatory authorities.[5]

Conduct of this inquiry

3. We have held in all 13 oral evidence sessions, with 17 different groups of witnesses. These have included individual experts, consumer groups and representative bodies from across the industry, but also the chief executives of five major life assurance companies, the Chairman and Chief Executive of the Financial Services Authority, and the Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Ruth Kelly MP).[6] The Committee has also received over 300 written submissions or letters from representative organisations, official bodies and individuals.[7] We are most grateful to all those who have assisted the Committee during this inquiry.

4. At an early stage in the inquiry, we decided that it would be useful to produce a separate report, in advance of the wider report, into the situation relating to endowment mortgages. This was both because the situation facing many hundreds of thousands of holders of endowment mortgages was particularly pressing and because it seemed to us that a number of the issues raised provided useful pointers to those we wished to discuss further in this wider report. We published the report on Endowment Mortgages on 11 March,[8] and the Government and FSA responses to the Report were published on 17 June.[9]

5. The Report by Lord Penrose into the events at Equitable Life[10] was published in March. The evidence we took on that report, from Lord Penrose and from the Financial Secretary, forms part of the oral evidence for this inquiry.[11] This evidence contributed to the ongoing debate about a resolution of the problems relating to Equitable and also to the discussion in this report (particularly in relation to with-profits funds). The Parliamentary Ombudsman, Ms Ann Abraham, has now indicated she will be conducting further investigations into the regulation of Equitable Life.[12]



1   Fifth Report of Session 2003-04, Restoring confidence in long-term savings: Endowment mortgages, HC 394 Back

2   See Tenth Report of Session 2000-01, Equitable Life and the Life Assurance Industry, HC 272, and further oral evidence taken on 30 October and 13 November 2001 (HC, 2001-02, 317-i and -ii) Back

3   See Third Report of Session 2002-03, Split Capital Investment Trusts, HC 418 Back

4   For an explanation of the characteristics of a precipice bond see FSA Guidance Note 7 issued on 19 February 2003 Back

5   Treasury Committee Press Notice 51 of Session 2002-03, 14 November 2002 Back

6   The full list of witnesses is at pp. 74 & 75; the oral evidence is published in Volume II of this Report, HC (2003-04) 71-II Back

7   The principal memoranda received in the early part of the inquiry (covering the period up to January 2004) were published in a separate volume HC (2003-04) 275; the principal memoranda received subsequently are published in Volume II to this Report HC (2003-04) 71-II. A number of other submissions, not involving personal or other confidential information, have been put in the public domain by being reported to the House and placed in the Library of the House and in the parliamentary Record Office: these are listed at p. 78 Back

8   Fifth Report of Session 2003-04, HC 394 Back

9   Fifth Special Report of Session 2003-04, HC 655 Back

10   HC (2003-04) 290 Back

11   Evidence session on 16 March, published earlier as HC (2003-04) 71-iv, and included in Volume II to this report, HC (2003-04) 71-II Back

12   Third Report of the Parliamentary Commissioner for Administration, Session 2003-04, HC 910 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 28 July 2004