Select Committee on Work and Pensions Fourth Report


1  INTRODUCTION

  1.  It is only necessary to open a newspaper or watch a news bulletin in the days, weeks and months following a major accident or incident to realise that the issue of health and safety touches all of us in our daily lives and, wrongly or inadequately implemented, can bring the lives of those closest to us to an end or cause serious injury.

  2.  In undertaking this inquiry the Committee is not responding to any single event, although several major incidents did occur during the short lifetime of the inquiry.[1] But away from the headlines there are some disturbing statistics. For example in 2002/03, 226 workers were fatally injured, there were 28,426 reported major injuries and 126,004 reported over-3-day injuries. [2] Moreover these figures do not include death and injuries arising from occupational road accidents.

  3.  The Government is aware of the seriousness of the situation and in June 2000 launched its Revitalising Health and Safety Strategy Statement (Revitalising). This set targets to reduce the number of working days lost from work-related injury and ill health, reduce the incidence of fatal and major injury accidents and reduce the rate of work-related ill health.

  4.  The Committee resolved to see whether these ambitious targets were likely to be met, while reaching a judgment on the adequacy of the resources provided. The inquiry was announced on 14 January 2004 with the aim of examining 'the work of the Health and Safety Commission and Health and Safety Executive, and the effectiveness of current arrangements to promote high standards of health and safety.'

  5.  As a result of the announcement we received 66 written submissions and took oral evidence from 27 organisations over 7 sessions. The response was in itself an indication that the subject needed the kind of detailed examination provided by a Select Committee.[3] The oral evidence sessions included employers, trade unions, professional bodies, organisations representing victims, central and local government and the Minister for Work.[4] During the course of the inquiry we undertook brief study visits - to Madrid, to look at the Spanish health and safety system, to Bilbao, to visit the headquarters of the European Agency for Safety and Health at Work and to the European Commission in Brussels. We also visited, and took evidence in, Scotland, to look at how HSC/E had responded to devolution. We are very grateful to all those who submitted memoranda, to those who gave oral evidence and to those who helped the Committee in its work.

  6.  The inquiry set out to examine the work of the Health and Safety Commission (HSC) and Health and Safety Executive (HSE) and the effectiveness of current arrangements to promote high standards of health and safety. Within HSE, we focused principally on the work of the Field Operations Directorate. However we decided that it would help the inquiry and our understanding of the issues, if we focussed on health and safety in two sectors of employment. We therefore agreed that our inquiry would include case studies of two problematic sectors: the construction industry and health and social care.

  7.  Throughout the inquiry the Committee has benefited greatly from the expert assistance of our three Specialist Advisers: Professor Jouni Jaakkola of Birmingham University, Professor Philip James of Middlesex University Business School and Professor David Walters of Cardiff University. The subject of the inquiry was new to the Committee and was an area in which some of us had no previous experience. We are therefore hugely grateful to the Advisers for identifying issues and people meriting our attention and explaining the more technical topics to us.


1   The explosion at the plastics factory at Grovepark Street Glasgow on 11 May 2004 (www.scotland.gov.uk/pages/news/extras/00020600.aspx) the death of 19 cockle pickers in Morecambe Bay on 5 February (new.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk news/England/Lancashire/3465109.stm-36k); and the death of three agricultural workers in Norfolk on 12 July (http://news/bbc.co.uk/hi/england/norfolk/3886925) Back

2   HSC, Health and Safety Statistics Highlights 2002/03, National Statistics. Examples of major injuries include: fractures (except to fingers, thumbs or toes), amputations, dislocations (of shoulder, hip, knee and spine) and other injuries leading to resuscitation or 24-hour admittance to hospital. Over-three-day injuries are injuries that lead to workers being absent from work or unable to do their usual job for over three days. Provisional statistics provided by HSC who that there were 30,000 reported major injuries and 96,733 over-three day injuries in 2003/04, see Volume II, (Ev 38). Back

3   Responsibility for HSE and HSC transferred from the Department for Transport, Local Government and the Regions to the Department for Work and Pensions in 2002.The Environment. Transport and Regional Affairs Committee produced a report on The Work of the Health and Safety Executive in 2000. Back

4   A full list of witnesses is at page 108 Back


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 July 2004