Select Committee on Work and Pensions Fourth Report


APPENDIX 4

VISIT TO MADRID AND BILBAO

9-11 March

Meeting at Spanish Labour Inspectorate with Señor Don Javier Minondo Sanz, Gonzalo Jiménez, Mario Grau, Fernando Nolla, Visitación Alvarez and Señora Otilia Crespo.

The meeting with representatives of the Spanish Government's Labour Inspectorate and the National Institute for Safety and Health and Work provided an overview of health and safety issues in Spain. There are similarities in the position between Spain and the UK - both have applied European law and there are some common issues. The legal systems are different, however, and this needs to be taken into account.

Spain's entry to the European Union had a profound effect as EU law on health and safety was implemented. Almost all Spain's health and safety law comes from Europe. One area on which Spanish law was already more generous was on working time, where the maximum is 40 hours (with some exceptions). The system needed to change from one of protection to one of prevention, with employers given flexibility to decide how to do it. The law has proved difficult to enforce. Levels of awareness are low. Health and safety is not generally taken into account when corporate decisions are made. Employers tend to 'outsource' their prevention so that decisions are taken by external specialists rather than being part of the corporate culture. There is a tendency for compliance to be formal - a matter of 'ticking boxes' - rather than actually being an attempt to improve standards of health and safety for employees. Participation is a particular problem for small and medium enterprises where accident rates are high. Also of concern is the poor record of sub-contractors in the construction industry. A renewed dialogue between Government and social partners in 2002 attempted to address these concerns. The results included an increase in inspection rates and new legal provisions. In particular, there were renewed attempts to embed health and safety in corporate decisions. There is now an obligation on employers where there are certain risks to have preventative resources on site. Measures were introduced to prevent compliance being merely formal.

Accident rates are relatively high and there is public pressure on government to act. The system needs to take root and a preventative culture to take effect. H&S does not feature highly in collective bargaining, where the focus tends to be on pay and working hours. At a national level unions recognise the importance of H&S and are involved in lobbying for change. However, at local level awareness is often lower. Trade unions are predominantly in the public sector and large companies. These tend to have lower accident rates in any case, so this makes it difficult to tell what impact trade unions have on accident rates.

National Institute for Safety and Health and Work (INSHT) is a scientific and technical body. It is involved in a broad range of research activities and provides technical support to government, and training. The structure of the Spanish state is complex. Legislation and health and safety (H&S) inspection are nationwide. Administration and promotion are at regional level. INSHT produces guidance for small employers. INSHT is producing information and guidance and offering training on emerging risks such as stress. Spain is in agreement with the European Commission strategy regarding emerging H&S risks. Information and guidance is free and there is also a telephone helpline for employers. The 'mutuas', who provide insurance, also provide multi-annual plans and advice and support to small companies.

The Labour Inspectorate has a broad range of responsibilities including working hours, salaries, collective bargaining and H&S. It ensures compliance with collective agreements which have the force of law. The Inspectorate's focus on H&S has increased and is now more than half of its work. It has considerable powers and can require a company to suspend operations if it considers the work imposes a risk. Employers have responsibilities and a breach need not be wilful for penalties to apply. The Labour Inspectorate is not responsible for public safety issues, which are dealt with elsewhere. Another important resource within individual firms are prevention officers (who are linked to trade unions). In December 2002, there were 739 inspectors and 787 deputy inspectors for 13 million employees. Inspectors made 120,000 visits to firms in 2002. Inspectors are obliged to investigate all fatal and serious accidents.

Individuals within companies may be prosecuted for breaches. If criminal prosecution is underway, administrative proceedings are suspended to avoid double jeopardy. Inspectors pass the file to judges. The law applies almost equally to the public and private sectors. Public officials have the same responsibilities as private sector managers. Requirements on small employers are less stringent. Levels of fines are lower as they correspond to the number of employees.

The influx of unskilled immigrant workers was considered to have contributed to high accident rates, especially in the construction sector. A range of factors were considered to contribute to this. In particular, such workers have little access to health and safety training. They are often on short-term contracts, do not have Spanish as a first language and, in some cases, are unable to read in any language. There are also high levels of labour mobility. One of the outcomes of the social dialogue in 2002 was an agreement by employers to provide training for these workers and public organisations have also been set up to do this. Contracts for construction employees are an average of 10 days. Many employees have contracts Monday to Friday. This makes it difficult for them to raise health and safety issues as the contract risks not being renewed for the next week. The inspectorate monitors these contracts and can check whether their short-term nature is justifiable.

Meeting with Fernando Rodrigo, Director of Instituto Sindical de Tradbajo, Tomas Lopez Arias, Head of Work Safety at UGT and Maite Vazquez del Rio (a journalist with ABC).

The legal framework for H&S in Spain is felt to be adequate, the difficulty is with implementation and compliance. A health and safety culture needs to take root in the workplace, among both employees and employers. Penalties are important in improving compliance rates among employers. A desire to cut costs was felt to be the principal reason for non-compliance. 'Prevention officers' are a significant new resource. Their role is focused on monitoring and ensuring enforcement. Levels of inspection are increasing. The challenge is to find the right balance. The authorities need to ask why the construction sector has such high accident rates. Reasons may include high proportions of temporary workers, young people and older workers, high levels of sub-contracting, many people working on a self-employed basis and high levels of people for whom Spanish is not a first language. These are the problems - solutions need to be found.

Labour relations in Spain were felt to be maturing and health and safety was gaining a higher priority in Spain politically and socially. The key obstacles to improving health and safety are structural - high levels of casual labour and temporary contracts (three times greater than the European average). Also there are high degrees of sub-contracting. Under-recording is a problem. A recent study found that in addition to 33 deaths in one province, 13 deaths were unrecorded, immigrant workers in insecure employment. A further problem is that employers tend to outsource prevention activities so that they are not part of the corporate culture and its difficult for employees to become involved. On the positive side, resources for prevention have increased and there is a growing number of employees active in prevention matters.

There is one Labour Inspector for each 20,000 workers compared to an average of one per 11,000 in the European union. There is a serious problem of inspection resources in Spain. Also, the Labour Inspectors have a wide remit, including hiring and social security. Trade unions argue that among the Labour Inspectors, there should be health and safety specialists. Short-term contracts are a major problem in preventing employees from raising health and safety issues. In 2002, 20% of accidents were sustained by workers with permanent contracts. 80% by those with short-term contracts. These statistics don't include the self-employed and immigrant workers. Prevention officers have some employment protection allowing them to raise H&S issues.

It was argued that the Spanish Government had missed an opportunity to modernize the law to address emerging risks when it implemented European directives. 2002 reforms stemming from social dialogue did not give sufficient weight to trade union perspectives. In strategic sectors, unions have had to use strikes to further the issue. Collective bargaining proposals are frequently rejected. Employers have traditionally seen trade unions as a problem. There are 100,000 Prevention Officers but they are not based in small companies with 2-4 employees (which form 96 percent of Spanish businesses.) Unions are arguing for 'territorial' prevention officers empowered to go into these small firms.

Current classifications of industrial diseases do not include the sorts of health issues women employees tend to face. Spain is the European state with the highest number of industrial accidents and the fewest industrial diseases recognised.

Wednesday 10 March, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, Bilbao

Alun Jones, Elke Schneider, Sarah Copsey, Markku Aaltonen and Francoise Murillo.

The European Agency for Safety and Health at Work (EASHW) was set up by the European Union in order to serve the information needs in the field of safety and health at work. It has three areas of activity:

    -  Collecting information through a network of designated experts and organisations.

    -  Communicating information, particularly through its website - www.ohsa.eu.int

    -  Developing knowledge on important occupational safety and health themes such as priorities and strategies, the economic impact of occupational safety and health and research priorities.

The Agency has national focal points in EU member states. In the UK, this is the Health and Safety Executive. Copies of the series of power-point presentations are attached to this note.

The work of the Agency contributes to the European Commission strategy on health and safety at work. One of the strands of the strategy for 2002-06 is to strengthen the preventative culture through the development of a genuine culture of risk prevention. The Agency has a key role to play in acting 'as a driving force in matters concerning awareness-building and risk anticipation.' An important part of this is the development of a 'risk observatory' to monitor emerging risks in the changing world of work. Another important part of the Agency's work is the running of annual Europe-wide health and safety weeks. These are information campaigns on specific OSH issues. In 2004, the focus is on the construction sector.

In terms of supporting policy making and implementation, The Agency's workplan for 2004 contained a number of areas of interest to the Committee - the effectiveness of economic incentives in safety and health, corporate social responsibility, including the gender dimension in occupational safety and health (OSH) activities and support for small and medium enterprises.

Monitoring occupational health and safety and the European risk observatory

Key challenges for OSH policy include changes in demography (increasing proportions of women in paid employment and people tending to stay in work for longer) and in the labour market (the organisation and processes of work). The objectives of the risk observatory are to:

    - Provide an overview of OSH in Europe;

    - Highlight trends in OSH outcomes and risk factors;

    - Provide early identification of newly emerging risks in the workplace;

    - Identify areas/issues where more information is needed.

The aim is to identify priorities and needs for the future, to assess the efficiency of preventive actions and be better prepared to meet future challenges. Two new forecasts - on biological and chemical risks - are to be published shortly.

Stress at work

Work-related stress affects 28% of workers in the EU. While there are limitations in contemporary research into the management of work-related stress, a research review by the Agency found that work-related stress can be dealt with in the same way as other health and safety issues (by adapting already well-established processes for the assessment and management of the physical risks to the management of stress.) Practical examples of this approach applied to stress at work, exist in several EU countries. Future research should concentrate on stress management interventions at the organisational level. Success factors in prevention initiatives include adequate risk analysis; thorough planning; a combination of measures covering anticipation, prevention, intervention, support and evaluation; continuing staff feedback; liaison with external bodies (such as the police, where violence is an issue); sustained prevention and top management support and resources.

The gender aspects of health and safety

It is EU policy to increase the participation of women in employment, through the creation of quality jobs. Good quality jobs, with high health and safety standards, are needed to recruit and retain women at work. An Agency research review on gender issues in safety and health at work found that substantial differences in the working lives of men and women affected their occupational safety and health. There are a higher proportion of women in low-paid, low-skilled and precarious jobs, they also typically have less control and autonomy. Men are more likely to suffer deaths or serious accidents at work and to be exposed to noise, but some women do dangerous or noisy work and heavy lifting and are more likely to be exposed to confrontation with violent members of the public. Women are also more likely to work in highly repetitive jobs, suffer work-related allergies (such as dermatitis), be exposed to infectious diseases and to suffer work-related stress. Women still carry out the majority of unpaid housework and caring responsibilities (even when working full-time) and this can add to work-related pressures. The study found that work-related risks to women have traditionally been underestimated and that this has result in less attention and fewer resources being directed towards those risks. Women are also under-represented in decision-making concerning occupational health and safety and need to be more directly involved in formulating and implementing occupational health and safety strategies. Taking a holistic approach, including looking at the work-life interface and the broader issues in work organisation, would improve risk prevention.

Corporate Social Responsibility and economic incentives in safety and health

The minimum responsibilities of employers regarding health and safety are contained in legislation. Although progress has been made, more needs to be done to achieve an overall goal of safe, healthy and productive jobs. A range of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) themes are relevant to health and safety:

Human resources management. The prevention aspect of occupational safety and health is a first step towards attaining a positive record on employability of the workforce through avoidance of work-related disability, ill-health and injury.

Prevention in procurement, outsourcing and subcontracting. Increasingly, public authorities apply strict conditions on subcontractors in their procurement processes. In Belgium, for example, this has proved a powerful tool in reaching small and medium enterprises (SMEs). There are also examples in the private sector of large companies applying strict procurement rules to influence the health and safety quality content of services and products provided.

Commitment to the local community. In the UK's 'business as good neighbour scheme', large companies act as mentors to local companies in occupational safety and health matters.

Social responsibility reporting and auditing. Many companies are including figures on absences owing to injury and ill-health, early retirement and staff turnover in annual reports. Health and safety auditing and recognition schemes could play an important role in the field of social auditing.

Social and eco-labels. In Sweden, a label/certificate has been developed as a marketing tool to install consumer confidence in the safety and design of products.

Socially responsible investment. Financial institutions are making increasing use of social and environmental checklists to evaluate the risks of loans to and investments in companies.

The development of the occupational safety and health aspect of CSR, with the full participation of workers and social partners, could add much to the development of a health and safety culture. As most of its elements are voluntary, this would complement the legal requirements. The Agency has done much work to develop thinking in this area. In 2004, it is also undertaking a project to look at the effectiveness of economic incentives to encourage improvements in safety and health. These incentives can include insurance systems, tax systems and subsidy systems. Special attention will be given to the needs of SMEs.

Small and medium enterprises

Here are 19 million small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in the EU. They represent 99 per cent of all EU enterprises and employ nearly 75 million people, 65 per cent of the EU's total working population. SMEs are a diverse group, have fewer resources (in terms of knowledge and capacity) and higher accident rates. The Agency is involved in developing a range of tools to improve occupational safety and health performance in Europe's SMEs. As part of these efforts, it has looked at good practice models. Aspects of an effective strategy include:

    -Taking appropriate measures: neither too complex nor too expensive. Tools need to take account of the needs and resources of the enterprise.

    - Supporting risk assessment, for example through providing training or consulting in the workplace.

    - Involving trade unions and employer associations, who may have practical knowledge of the sector and whose involvement can add credibility.

    - Targeting actions at a specific sector or activity proved to be particularly successful.

Thursday 11 March 2004

Mutua Vizcaya Industrial and Arcerlia, Bilbao

Miguel Angel Lujua, Jesús Dalmau Meñica (Mutua Vizcaya), Marta Urrutia (EASHW), Victor Manuel Echenagusía Capelastegui (Arceralia)

The 'Mutuas de Accidentes' (known as the Mutuas) are social insurance organisations that also play an important role in both preventive and compensatory aspects of occupational health. They are associations of employers. They are non-profit making and any surplus goes back into organisation. They interact with the Spanish social security system. There are 29 Mutuas in Spain, covering 96.6 per cent (11.78 million) of workers in the General Regime of Social Security. The Social Security system covers the remaining 3.4 per cent (638,955) of workers.

Mutuas provide financial support to those of work owing to occupational injury or ill-health, they also provide medical services, support for rehabilitation and advice on prevention. The amount depends on earnings levels and family size, for a maximum of 18 months. There is also a lump sum payment, depending on the extent of any injury. Mutuas get most of their income from the companies who are members. Levels of payment vary according to the worker's job and wage level. Currently, there is no link to the company's safety record. The Government has been working on developing a system whereby companies with good records pay less and those with poor records pay more, but there have been delays in implementing this. Mutuas charge for provision of an 'External Prevention Service' and for health treatment to workers who are not mutual members.

Companies in Spain are required to engage a prevention service if they have more than 500 employees or more than 250 and work in a dangerous activity. Mutuas are also involved in rehabilitation to support employees to return to work. Mutua Vizcaya reported that this had resulted in better recovery rates.

Arcelaria, a steel company, represented locally, but with branches around the world is engaged in a continuous process to improve health and safety standards for employees, including sub-contractors. The cycle is to identify risks, set objectives, implement preventative actions, evaluate results and modify processes on the basis of this. At the moment, Aceralia uses the Mutua for medical treatment services but is privately insured. It is cheaper for it to do this because it is a large company with a good safety record. It will review the position when the Government brings in the system of allowing companies with good records to pay lower premiums.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 23 July 2004