Civil Partnership Bill [Lords]

[back to previous text]

Mr. Carmichael: I shall not detain the Committee. I have said on a number of occasions, both in Committee and on Second Reading, that, on my analysis, the Government have sought to reproduce, in civil partnerships, provisions relating to civil marriage, warts and all. If that was the approach, it is curious that there is no verbal declaration to be made at the time of entering into civil partnership. For that reason, I have no difficulty in supporting amendment No. 14, tabled by the hon. Member for Rutland and Melton.

Although I do not have any great difficulty with the manner in which the hon. Member for Rhondda sought to place in the Bill the prescribed form of words, which, as he says, is lifted from the Marriage Act 1949 mutatis mutandis, I have some difficulty with proposed subsection (4B) in amendment No. 16, which makes it clear that the form of ceremony is to be read subject to the whole section, which would of course include subsection (5). I can see how the two of them can just about live together, butó

It being twenty-five minutes past Eleven o'clock, The Chairman adjourned the Committee without Question put, pursuant to the Standing Order.

Adjourned till this day at half-past Two o'clock.

Column Number: 073

The following Members attended the Committee:
Gale, Mr. Roger (Chairman)
Abbott, Ms
Bercow, Mr.
Borrow, Mr.
Bruce, Malcolm
Bryant, Chris
Carmichael, Mr.
Chope, Mr.
Donaldson, Mr.
Duncan, Mr. Alan

Column Number: 074


Eagle, Angela
Love, Mr.
McGuire, Mrs.
McKechin, Ann
Selous, Andrew
Simon, Mr.
Smith, Jacqui
Stewart, Mr. David
Watson, Mr.

 
Previous Contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries ordering index


©Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 21 October 2004