Amendments proposed to the Prevention of Terrorism Bill - continued House of Commons

back to previous text
   

Mr Robin Cook
Mr Chris Smith
Vera Baird
Helen Jackson
Mr Jim Cousins
Rob Marris

Joan RuddockMr Clive BettsDr Desmond Turner
Lynne JonesJohn AustinMr Simon Thomas
Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam PricePete Wishart
Angus Robertson

3

Clause     2,     page     3,     line     36,     leave out from end of line to end of line 25 on page 4 and insert—

      '(a) the court must consider whether the matters relied on by the Secretary of State to justify applying for the order were capable (if not disproved) of constituting reasonable grounds for it to make an interim control order.

      (b) in the event of the court making an interim control order it must give directions for the carrying out of a hearing of the court to consider making a control order.

      (c) on a hearing by the court under subsection (2) (b) the court must conduct its own hearing of each of the matters that fell to be determined by the Secretary of State—

      (i) in making his decision to apply for the order; and

      (ii) in making his decisions to apply for the obligations imposed by the order; and the court must make its own determination on the balance of probabilities on each of those matters.'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

10

Clause     2,     page     3,     line     37,     leave out subparagraph (a) and insert—

      '(a) the controlled person may appeal within 14 days—

      (i) in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland to the Court of Appeal, or

      (ii) in Scotland to the Inner House of the Court of Session;

      (aa) the appeal must be considered within 7 days of the application; and'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

134

Clause     2,     page     3,     line     39,     leave out from 'whether' to end of line 42 and insert—'the Secretary of State has shown on the balance of probabilities—

      (i) that the person is an individual who is or has been involved in terrorism-related activity, there is a designated derogation within subsection (1) (c) and the obligation is within subsection (1)(d); and

      (ii) that the imposition of the obligation is necessary for purposes connected with protecting members of the public from risks arising out of, or associated with, a particular public emergency.'.

   

Mr David Winnick

164

*Clause     2,     page     3,     line     44,     leave out '7' and insert '3'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

136

Clause     2,     page     3,     line     45,     at end insert—

    '(3A)   The controlled person has a right to be heard on a reference under subsection (2)(a).'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

135

Clause     2,     page     4,     leave out lines 1 to 7 and insert—

      '(a) if not satisfied that the Secretary of State has proved the matters in subsection (2)(b)(i), must quash the order;

      (b) if satisfied that the matters in subsection (2)(b)(i) have been proved but not satisfied that the matters in subsection (2)(b)(ii) have been proved, must quash the derogating obligation imposed by the order.'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

11

Clause     2,     page     4,     line     10,     leave out 'by the court' and insert 'of the appeal'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

12

Clause     2,     page     4,     line     11,     after 'the', insert 'court on the application of the'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

13

Clause     2,     page     4,     line     21,     leave out 'Secretary of State' and insert 'court of first instance'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

137

Clause     2,     page     4,     line     22,     at end insert—

      '(e) power to award damages to the controlled person.'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

139

Clause     2,     page     4,     line     22,     at end insert—

      '(e) power to award to the controlled person their costs of the proceedings.'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

100

Page     3,     line     22,     leave out Clause 2.


   

Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael
David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer

David Maclean

68

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     36,     leave out 'non-derogating'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

199

*Clause     3,     page     4,     line     37,     leave out 'of' and insert 'specified in the order and not exceeding'.

   

Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael
David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer

David Maclean

69

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     41,     leave out 'non-derogating'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

14

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     43,     after 'The', insert 'court on the application of the'.

   

Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael
Lynne Jones
John Austin

70

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     43,     leave out from 'The' to 'control' and insert 'The court may renew a'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

185

*Clause     3,     page     4,     line     43,     leave out 'Secretary of State' and insert 'court'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

103

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     43,     leave out 'non-derogating'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

200

*Clause     3,     page     4,     line     44,     leave out 'of' and insert 'not exceeding'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael

Vera BairdSimon ThomasMr Alex Salmond
Mr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael WeirHywel Williams
Annabelle EwingAdam PricePete Wishart
Angus RobertsonMr Clive Betts

15

Clause     3,     page     4,     line     44,     leave out 'he' and insert 'it'.

   

Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael
Lynne Jones
John Austin

72

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     1,     leave out 'purposes connected with' and insert 'the purpose of'.

   

Mr Win Griffiths
Mrs Jackie Lawrence
Richard Burden
Mr Clive Betts
Vera Baird
Mr Simon Thomas

Mr Alex SalmondMr Elfyn LlwydMr Michael Weir
Hywel WilliamsAnnabelle EwingAdam Price
Pete WishartAngus Robertson

16

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     7,     after first 'the', insert 'court on the application of the'.

   

Mr Mark Oaten
Mr David Heath
Mr Alistair Carmichael
Lynne Jones
John Austin
David Davis

Mr Dominic GrievePatrick MercerDavid Maclean

73

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     7,     leave out 'Secretary of State' and insert 'court'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

104

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     7,     leave out 'non-derogating'.

   

David Davis
Mr Dominic Grieve
Patrick Mercer
David Maclean

105

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     11,     leave out 'non-derogating'.

   

Mr John Denham
Vera Baird
Mr David Kidney
Lynne Jones

97

Clause     3,     page     5,     line     12,     at end add—

    '(6)   Before renewing a non-derogating control order the Secretary of State must—

      (a) seek the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions on whether there is sufficient evidence on which to bring a criminal prosecution against the controlled person; and

      (b) publish on the face of the instrument renewing a non-derogating control order a statement as to whether or not such advice has been obtained.'.

   

Mr David Winnick

165

*Clause     3,     page     5,     line     12,     at end add—

    '(6)   An order under this section—

      (a) must be laid before Parliament after being made; and

      (b) if not approved by a resolution of each House before the end of 40 days beginning with the day on which the order was made, ceases to have effect at the end of that period.

    (7)   Where an order ceases to have effect in accordance with subsection (6), that does not—

      (a) affect anything previously done in reliance on the order; or

      (b) prevent the Secretary of State from exercising any power of his to make a new order to the same or similar effect.'.

 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page Search page Enquiries index

©Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 Feb 2005