House of Commons portcullis
House of Commons
Session 2004 - 05
Internet Publications
Other Bills before Parliament


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

232

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

(b)    

the court must consider whether the matters relied on by the Secretary of

 

State to justify the making of the order were capable (if not disproved) of

 

constituting reasonable grounds for him to make the order he did.

 

(6B)    

The court’s consideration on a reference under subsection (6A)(a) must begin no

 

more than 7 days after the day on which the control order in question was made.

 

(6C)    

On a reference under subsection (6A)(a), the court—

 

(a)    

if not satisfied that the matters relied on by the Secretary of State were

 

capable of constituting reasonable grounds for him to make a control

 

order against the controlled person, must quash the order; and

 

(b)    

in any other case, must give directions for the carrying out of a hearing

 

by the court relating to the order.

 

(6D)    

On a hearing by the court under subsection (6C)(c), the court must conduct its

 

own hearing of each of the matters that fell to be determined by the Secretary of

 

State—

 

(a)    

in making his decision to make the order; and

 

(b)    

in making his decisions to impose the obligations imposed by the order;

 

    

and the court must make its own determination on each of those matters.

 

(6E)    

The powers of the court in making the determinations under subsection (6D) are

 

confined to—

 

(a)    

power to confirm the order as made;

 

(b)    

power to quash the order;

 

(c)    

power to quash one or more obligations imposed by the order;

 

(d)    

power to give directions to the Secretary of State for the revocation of the

 

order or for the modification of the obligations it imposes.

 

(6F)    

If requested to do so by the controlled person, the court must discontinue—

 

(a)    

a reference under subsection (6A)(a); or

 

(b)    

a hearing under subsection (6C)(c).’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  152

 

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  7,  leave out ‘specified person’ and insert ‘police constable’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  198

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  9,  at end insert—

 

‘(7A)    

A control order may not be made against more than one individual.’.

 

Mr Jim Cousins

 

Not called  172

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  12,  at end insert ‘related to a threat to national security or a

 

threat to the national security of other nations’.


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

233

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Lynne Jones

 

John Austin

 

Not called  178

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  15,  leave out ‘gives’ and insert ‘is intended to give’.

 

Lynne Jones

 

John Austin

 

Not called  179

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  16,  leave out ‘or which is intended to do so’.

 

Mr John Denham

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr David Kidney

 

Lynne Jones

 

Not called  96

 

Clause  1,  page  3,  line  21,  at end add—

 

‘(9)    

Before making a control order the Secretary of State must—

 

(a)    

seek the advice of the Director of Public Prosecutions on whether there

 

is sufficient evidence on which to bring a criminal prosecution against the

 

controlled person; and

 

(b)    

publish on the face of the control order a statement as to whether or not

 

such advice has been obtained.’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not selected  217

 

Page  1,  line  2,  leave out Clause 1.

 

Clause Agreed to on division.

 


 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Mr Alex Salmond

 

Not called  6

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  23,  after ‘The’, insert ‘court on the application of the’.

 

Mr Robin Cook

 

Mr Chris Smith

 

Vera Baird

 

Helen Jackson

 

Mr Jim Cousins

 

Rob Marris

 

Clare Short

 

Not called  1

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  23,  leave out ‘make’ and insert ‘apply for’.


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

234

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Mark Oaten

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Alistair Carmichael

 

Lynne Jones

 

John Austin

 

David Davis

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not called  64

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  23,  leave out ‘make’ and insert ‘apply to the court for’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not selected  183

 

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  23,  after ‘order’, insert ‘under section 1’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  7

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  26,  leave out ‘he’ and insert ‘it’.

 

Mr Mark Oaten

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Alistair Carmichael

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not called  65

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  26,  leave out ‘on the balance of probabilities’ and insert

 

‘beyond reasonable doubt’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  8

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  28,  leave out ‘he’ and insert ‘it’.

 

Mr Mark Oaten

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Alistair Carmichael

 

Lynne Jones

 

John Austin

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not called  67

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  29,  leave out ‘purposes connected with’ and insert ‘the

 

purpose of’.


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

235

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Not called  168

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  32,  leave out ‘and’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Not called  169

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  34,  at end insert ‘and

 

(e)    

he has obtained the agreement of the Intelligence and Security Commitee

 

(“the Committee”).

 

(1A)    

For the purposes of subsection (1)(e)—

 

(a)    

the Secretary of State must place before the Committee—

 

(i)    

the evidence on which he relied in deciding to apply for the

 

making of a control order imposing a derogating obligation, and

 

(ii)    

a statement of the reasons for his decision, and

 

(b)    

the Committee must decide, within 48 hours of receiving that evidence

 

and that statement, whether or not to agree to the application.’.

 

Mr Mark Oaten

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Alistair Carmichael

 

Lynne Jones

 

John Austin

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not called  66

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  35,  leave out from beginning to end of line 34 on page 4.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  184

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  35,  leave out subsections (2) to (7).

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  9

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  35,  after ‘the’, insert ‘court on the application of the’.

 

Mr Robin Cook

 

Mr Chris Smith

 

Vera Baird

 

Helen Jackson

 

Mr Jim Cousins

 

Rob Marris

 

Clare Short

 

Not called  2

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  35,  leave out ‘makes’ and insert ‘applies for’.


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

236

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

Mr Robin Cook

 

Mr Chris Smith

 

Vera Baird

 

Helen Jackson

 

Mr Jim Cousins

 

Rob Marris

 

Clare Short

 

Not called  3

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  36,  leave out from end of line to end of line 25 on page 4 and

 

insert—

 

‘(a)    

the court must consider whether the matters relied on by the Secretary of

 

State to justify applying for the order were capable (if not disproved) of

 

constituting reasonable grounds for it to make an interim control order.

 

(b)    

in the event of the court making an interim control order it must give

 

directions for the carrying out of a hearing of the court to consider

 

making a control order.

 

(c)    

on a hearing by the court under subsection (2) (b) the court must conduct

 

its own hearing of each of the matters that fell to be determined by the

 

Secretary of State—

 

(i)    

in making his decision to apply for the order; and

 

(ii)    

in making his decisions to apply for the obligations imposed by

 

the order;

 

and the court must make its own determination on the balance of

 

probabilities on each of those matters.’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  10

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  37,  leave out subparagraph (a) and insert—

 

‘(a)    

the controlled person may appeal within 14 days—

 

(i)    

in England and Wales or in Northern Ireland to the Court of

 

Appeal, or

 

(ii)    

in Scotland to the Inner House of the Court of Session;

 

(aa)    

the appeal must be considered within 7 days of the application; and’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  134

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  39,  leave out from ‘whether’ to end of line 42 and insert—

 

‘the Secretary of State has shown on the balance of probabilities—

 

(i)    

that the person is an individual who is or has been involved in

 

terrorism-related activity, there is a designated derogation within

 

subsection (1) (c) and the obligation is within subsection (1)(d);

 

and

 

(ii)    

that the imposition of the obligation is necessary for purposes

 

connected with protecting members of the public from risks


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

237

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

arising out of, or associated with, a particular public

 

emergency.’.

 

Mr David Winnick

 

Not called  164

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  44,  leave out ‘7’ and insert ‘3’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  136

 

Clause  2,  page  3,  line  45,  at end insert—

 

‘(3A)    

The controlled person has a right to be heard on a reference under subsection

 

(2)(a).’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  135

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  leave out lines 1 to 7 and insert—

 

‘(a)    

if not satisfied that the Secretary of State has proved the matters in

 

subsection (2)(b)(i), must quash the order;

 

(b)    

if satisfied that the matters in subsection (2)(b)(i) have been proved but

 

not satisfied that the matters in subsection (2)(b)(ii) have been proved,

 

must quash the derogating obligation imposed by the order.’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  11

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  10,  leave out ‘by the court’ and insert ‘of the appeal’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  12

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  11,  after second ‘the’, insert ‘court on the application of the’.

 

Mr Win Griffiths

 

Mrs Jackie Lawrence

 

Richard Burden

 

Mr Clive Betts

 

Vera Baird

 

Mr Simon Thomas

 

Not called  13

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  21,  leave out ‘Secretary of State’ and insert ‘court of first


 
 

Committee of the Whole House Proceedings: 28th February 2005

238

 

Prevention of Terrorism Bill, continued

 
 

instance’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  137

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(e)    

power to award damages to the controlled person.’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  139

 

Clause  2,  page  4,  line  22,  at end insert—

 

‘(e)    

power to award to the controlled person their costs of the proceedings.’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not selected  100

 

Page  3,  line  22,  leave out Clause 2.

 

Clause Agreed to on division.

 


 

Mr Mark Oaten

 

Mr David Heath

 

Mr Alistair Carmichael

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

Simon Hughes

 

Not called  68

 

Clause  3,  page  4,  line  36,  leave out ‘non-derogating’.

 

David Davis

 

Mr Dominic Grieve

 

Patrick Mercer

 

David Maclean

 

Not called  199

 

Clause  3,  page  4,  line  37,  leave out ‘of’ and insert ‘specified in the order and not

 

exceeding’.


 
previous section contents continue
 
House of Commons home page Houses of Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Revised 1 March 2005