8 Dec 2004 : Column 530Wcontinued
Departmental Expenditure
Mr. Bercow:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his estimate is of the cost of (a) ministerial cars and drivers and (b) taxis for his Department in each of the last two years. [202489]
Mr. Timms:
Information concerning ministerial cars in the financial year 200203 was given by the then Minister for the Cabinet Office on 13 November 2003, Official Report, columns 39798W. The Minister for the Cabinet Office has asked the Chief Executive of the Government Car and Despatch Agency to write to the hon. Member with details of the cost of ministerial vehicles in 200304.
Expenditure on taxis is estimated to have been £163,000 in 200203 and £151,000 in 200304.
Mr. Bercow:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer if he will make a statement on energy costs incurred by his Department in each of the last two years. [202490]
Mr. Timms:
Energy costs in 1 Horse Guards Road reduced by 15 per cent. over the last two years.
Mr. Bercow:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what his estimate is of the (a) annual cost and (b) total value of the empty properties owned by (i) his Department, (ii) agencies and (iii) other public bodies for which he has had responsibility in each of the last two years. [202491]
Mr. Timms:
HM Treasury, the Office of Government Commerce, the Royal Mint, the Government Actuary's Department, the Debt Management Office, the Office for National Statistics and National Savings and Investments do not own any empty properties.
Inland Revenue, HM Customs and Excise and the Valuation Office Agency sold their freehold properties to Mapeley on 2 April 2001 as part of the STEPS PFI contract. Mapeley have assumed responsibility for these since then, irrespective of whether the properties are empty or occupied.
Mr. Bercow:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what crèche facilities are provided by his Department; and at what cost. [202498]
Mr. Timms:
The Treasury does not provide any crèche facilities. The Department is a member of the Westminster Holiday Playscheme, which operates during school holidays and is open to children aged 4 years 9 months to 12. The Treasury has two bespoke playscheme rooms, which can cater for up to 18 children. The cost per child is £30 a day and the Treasury subsidises the costs by 60 per cent. The total subsidy to Treasury parents using the playscheme is £4,100.
The Treasury also supports the child care cost of eligible staff. Staff who work full time receive £40.00 per week per family, part timers receive a pro-rated amount.
85 staff members receive child care vouchers. The total cost of child care vouchers, since the scheme was introduced in January 2004 is £134,000.
8 Dec 2004 : Column 531W
Labour Statistics
Mr. Cousins:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer (1) how many people over 65 were in employment in each metropolitan authority and county area in the North East region in each year from 1997 to 2004; [202680]
(2) how many and what percentage of 50 to 65-year-olds were economically inactive in (a) the North East region, and (b) each (i) metropolitan authority and (ii) county area within the North East region in each year from 1997 to 2003. [202681]
Mr. Timms:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.
Letter from Len Cook to Mr. Jim Cousins, dated 8 December 2004:
As National Statistician, I have been asked to reply to your Parliamentary Questions about employment and economic inactivity. (202680, 202681)
These estimates from the Labour Force Survey are, as with any sample survey, subject to sampling variability.
Economic activity in the North East region and each metropolitan authority and county area 12-month period ending in February each year United Kingdom
| 1997
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 147 | 42.0 | 22
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA | 3 | 24.7 | (8)
|
Durham UA | 31 | 42.7 | 4
|
Gateshead | 11 | 40.7 | 2
|
Hartlepool UA | 6 | 44.4 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA9 | 55.9 | (8)
|
Newcastle upon Tyne13 | 41.1 | 3
|
North Tyneside | 9 | 32.5 | (8)
|
Northumberland | 16 | 37.5 | 5
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA10 | 44.1 | 1
|
South Tyneside | 8 | 44.5 | 2
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA9 | 41.7 | 1
|
Sunderland | 19 | 51.1 | 1
|
| 1998
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 153 | 42.7 | 19
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA | 5 | 38.3 | (8)
|
Durham UA | 32 | 44.5 | 4
|
Gateshead | 12 | 40.4 | 2
|
Hartlepool UA | 5 | 42.3 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA8 | 42.1 | (8)
|
Newcastle upon Tyne15 | 42.2 | 3
|
North Tyneside | 10 | 38.6 | 1
|
Northumberland | 20 | 42.9 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA11 | 43.9 | (8)
|
South Tyneside | 7 | 35.2 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA9 | 37.1 | 1
|
Sunderland | 20 | 51.6 | 1
|
8 Dec 2004 : Column 532W
| 1999
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 157 | 42.9 | 21
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA | 5 | 33.1 | (8)
|
Durham UA | 33 | 43.6 | 6
|
Gateshead | 12 | 42.8 | 1
|
Hartlepool UA | 5 | 41.1 | (8)
|
Middlesbrough UA7 | 36.5 | 2
|
Newcastle upon Tyne10 | 33.9 | 3
|
North Tyneside | 12 | 38.1 | 1
|
Northumberland | 19 | 40.3 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA12 | 56.4 | (8)
|
South Tyneside | 9 | 44.3 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA11 | 42.0 | (8)
|
Sunderland | 22 | 55.0 | 1
|
| 2000
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 156 | 41.9 | 24
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA | 7 | 38.6 | 2
|
Durham UA | 29 | 40.3 | 6
|
Gateshead | 13 | 42.4 | 1
|
Hartlepool UA | 5 | 37.8 | (8)
|
Middlesbrough UA7 | 33.6 | 1
|
Newcastle upon Tyne7 | 26.2 | 2
|
North Tyneside | 12 | 35.5 | 2
|
Northumberland | 22 | 43.6 | 5
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA13 | 59.3 | 1
|
South Tyneside | 10 | 43.8 | 2
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA10 | 43.8 | (8)
|
Sunderland | 22 | 52.1 | 3
|
| 2001
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 150 | 39.8 | 23
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA | 5 | 34.6 | 1
|
Durham UA | 31 | 40.1 | 4
|
Gateshead | 11 | 37.0 | 1
|
Hartlepool UA6 | 47.7 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA8 | 44.3 | 1
|
Newcastle upon Tyne10 | 33.7 | 2
|
North Tyneside10 | 35.1 | 2
|
Northumberland | 19 | 37.1 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA10 | 44.4 | 1
|
South Tyneside10 | 45.2 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA10 | 36.9 | 1
|
Sunderland | 20 | 46.0 | 2
|
| 2002
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 151 | 39.5 | 21
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA5 | 36.0 | 1
|
Durham UA | 33 | 40.0 | 4
|
Gateshead | 10 | 33.1 | 1
|
Hartlepool UA5 | 43.6 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA8 | 43.1 | 1
|
Newcastle upon Tyne12 | 36.2 | 2
|
North Tyneside10 | 33.5 | 1
|
Northumberland | 19 | 37.7 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA10 | 42.7 | 1
|
South Tyneside9 | 43.7 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA11 | 39.1 | 1
|
Sunderland | 19 | 46.8 | 2
|
8 Dec 2004 : Column 533W
| 2003
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 151 | 39.1 | 20
|
Darlington UA6 | 37.0 | 1
|
Durham UA | 35 | 43.7 | 3
|
Gateshead | 11 | 38.4 | 1
|
Hartlepool UA7 | 47.2 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA8 | 46.7 | 1
|
Newcastle upon Tyne14 | 41.3 | 2
|
North Tyneside10 | 33.5 | 1
|
Northumberland | 16 | 30.3 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA9 | 40.9 | 1
|
South Tyneside9 | 43.6 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA9 | 33.2 | 1
|
Sunderland | 17 | 39.7 | 2
|
| 2004
|
| Number of economically inactive people aged 50 to 64 years(5) (000s) | Inactivity rate for people aged 50 to 64 years(6) (%) | Number of people in employment aged 65 years and over(7) (000s)
|
North East | 149 | 38.4 | 23
|
| | |
|
Darlington UA5 | 35.6 | 1
|
Durham UA | 34 | 41.1 | 4
|
Gateshead | 11 | 40.0 | 2
|
Hartlepool UA6 | 42.8 | 1
|
Middlesbrough UA7 | 39.6 | 1
|
Newcastle upon Tyne14 | 40.3 | 3
|
North Tyneside10 | 35.1 | 1
|
Northumberland | 15 | 28.8 | 4
|
Redcar and Cleveland UA10 | 43.5 | 1
|
South Tyneside10 | 42.6 | 1
|
Stockton-on-Tees UA9 | 34.3 | 1
|
Sunderland | 18 | 41.8 | 3
|
(5) Economically inactive refers to women aged 50 to 59 and men aged 50 to 64 who are neither employed nor unemployed.
(6) The rates are based on people aged 50 to 64 who are economically inactive as percentage of total population in the relevant age group.
(7) Refers to men aged 65 to 99 women aged 60 to 99.
(8) Estimates not available because sample size is too small.
Note:
Some estimates are based on smaller sample sizes and are therefore subject to a higher degree of sampling variability. They should be treated with caution and, in particular, changes from year to year should not be used in isolation from the figures for a run of years.
Source:
ONS Labour Force Survey
8 Dec 2004 : Column 534W
Mr. Willetts:
To ask the Chancellor of the Exchequer what the employment rate is of women in couples where the woman's partner (a) does not work and (b) does work. [203166]
Mr. Timms:
The information requested falls within the responsibility of the National Statistician, who has been asked to reply.
Letter from Colin Mowl to Mr. David Willetts, dated 8 December 2004:
The National Statistician has been asked to reply to your recent Parliamentary Question about employment. I am replying in his absence. (203166)
Among couples who were both of working age (i.e. men aged 16 to 64 and women aged 16 to 59) the employment rates for the female partners were: (a) 42.3% for those whose male partner was not in employment; and (b) 79.4 % for those whose male partner was in employment.
These estimates come from the Labour Force Survey (LFS) and apply to the three months ending May 2004. As with any statistical sample survey the LFS estimates are subject to sampling error.