|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs what the total value was of contracts between community recycling organisations and local authorities in England in (a) 2000, (b) 2001, (c) 2002 and (d) 2003. 
Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs how many community recycling organisations were registered in England to collect waste in (a) 2000, (b) 2001, (c) 2002 and (d) 2003. 
Norman Baker: To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what procurement policy the Government have in place for the use of timber in sea defence projects; and what steps she takes to ensure that all such timber is (a) procured from legal and sustainable sources and (b) certified by one of the two systems the Central Point on Expertise on Timber has identified as guaranteeing legality and sustainability; 
(2) if she will list the sea defence projects planned for (a) 200405 and (b) 200506 which will use timber in their construction, stating (i) what type of timber will be used, (ii) whether this timber is procured from legal and sustainable sources and (iii) whether this timber is certified by one of the two systems the Central Point on Expertise on Timber has identified as guaranteeing legality and sustainability. 
Defra funds most of the Environment Agency's flood defence activities and provides grant aid on a project-by-project basis to the other flood and coastal defence operating authorities (local authorities
15 Dec 2004 : Column 1110W
and internal drainage boards) to support their investment in improvement projects to manage flood and coastal erosion risk.
In 2000, the Government announced that Departments and agencies, including the Environment Agency, must actively seek to procure timber and timber products from sources independently validated as legal and sustainably managed. In 2002, Defra Ministers wrote to all English local authorities to encourage them to adopt responsible timber procurement policies. However, choice of materials to be used in construction of defences and whether they are obtained from legal and sustainable sources is a matter for the relevant operating authority. I regret therefore that parts (i), (ii) and (iii) of question 202088 could not be answered without incurring disproportionate cost.
I understand that the Environment Agency, as a non-departmental body of Defra, purchases timber in accordance with the Government's timber procurement policy. Currently this policy is to require contractors to supply timber products that derive from legally harvested trees. Bidders for Government contracts are invited to offer timber from sustainable sources as a higher quality variant and such offers are given preference where they offer value for money.
Timber used by the Agency in sea defence projects is predominantly tropical hardwood. The Central Point on Expertise on Timber (CPET) has concluded that all five certification schemes it examined provide assurance of compliance with Government requirements for legal timber. CPET further concluded that the Forestry Stewardship Council and the Canadian Standards Association will also assure central departments that timber products derive from sustainably managed forests. However there is very little certified hardwood available that is suitable for marine work.
The Agency is working with its supply chain to encourage more production of tropical hardwood that can be independently verified as legally harvested from sustainably managed forests. The Agency currently does its own auditing of timber use in the absence of any other independent verification.
The following table shows coastal defence projects on which authorities are likely to incur expenditure in years
15 Dec 2004 : Column 1111W
200405 and 200506 and where timber is either likely to be used or to have been used. The table is based on forward planning project information provided recently
15 Dec 2004 : Column 1112W
by the Environment Agency and by local authorities in the summer and should be regarded as indicative rather than a definitive list.
|Allerdale borough council||Maryport Harbour Flood and Coast Defence||On-going|
|Arun district council||Elmer Phase 3||200506|
|Arun district council||Felpham Beach Nourishment||200506|
|Bournemouth borough council||Groyne Building Programme, Stage 26||On-going|
|Canterbury city council||Tankerton Sea DefencesPhase 3||On-going|
|Canterbury city council||Whitstable Coastal Defences||200405|
|Dover district council||Kingsdown and Walmer Beach Management||On-going|
|Eastbourne borough council||Eastbourne Beach Management||200405|
|East Riding of Yorkshire||Withernsea Southern Revetment||200405|
|Environment Agency||Pert, near Rye, East Sussex||On-going|
|Environment Agency||Bulverhythe, St. Leonards on Sea, East Sussex||200506|
|Hastings borough council||Hastings Beach Management (Years 15)||200405|
|Havant borough council||Shingle Recycling, Seafront, Hayling Island||200405|
|Havant borough council||Beach Nourishment, Eastoke, Hayling Island||200506|
|Portsmouth city council||Old Portsmouth Flood Protection Works||On-going|
|Rother district council||Cooden to Cliff End Coastal Defence||200506|
|Waveney district council||Southwold Town Defence Improvements||200506|
|West Dorset district council||West Bay Coastal Defence, Harbour Improvements and Sea Defences||On-going|
Mr. Morley: Table 1 sets out the monthly flow data of sewage discharges from Abingdon, Cassington, Little Marlow and Windsor treatment works directly to the upper freshwater section of the Thames. Secondary and more stringent treatment is provided to the sewage prior to discharge at Abingdon, Little Marlow and Windsor. Discharges from Cassington receive secondary treatment, and are to receive more stringent treatment in 2005.
Table 2 sets out the average monthly volumes of fully treated, to secondary standards, and partially treated, because of excess flows during wet weather, sewage discharges to the Thames from Beckton, Crossness, Long Reach, Mogden and Riverside treatment works. I have provided the monthly average as the volumes are fairly constant throughout the year.
|Fully treated sewage from five treatment works||Partially treated sewage from five treatment works|
Table 3 sets out the monthly calculated volumes of untreated sewage discharged to the Thames from the five largest pumping stations during wet weather. As no data are available for the other overflows along the Thames Tideway, it is estimated that on average these volumes represent 60 per cent. of the total discharge from London's combined drainage system at these times.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|