|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
Matthew Taylor: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many staff in his Department were employed to deal with Freedom of Information Act 2000 issues in (a) 2001, (b) 2002, (c) 2003 and (d) 2004; and how many staff are budgeted to deal with Freedom of Information Act 2000 issues in (i) 2005 and (ii) 2006. 
Managing records and handling requests for information is part of the work carried out by all officials. There are, in addition, a small number
11 Jan 2005 : Column 299W
dedicated to handling information requests whether under the Code of Practice on Access to Government Information or the Data Protection Act. This centre of expertise has also been making preparations for the onset of the Freedom of Information access responsibilities that commence in January 2005 and will then concentrate on handling incoming cases.
Numbers provided are for staff leading on Information Access (including FOI) issues but do not include staff dealing with routine information requests received across the department. Where peaks of activity resulted in fluctuating numbers of staff within specific years the maximum number of staff has been cited.
(a) 2001=4, (b) 2002=6, (c) 2003=7, (d) 2004=25.5. Future staffing requirements will be reviewed in 2005 in the light of experience. This will depend on: the number of requests for information received; the complexity of requests, and the number of appeals received. Staff numbers for 2005 are provisional at this stage and are again for staff leading on all Information Access (including FOI) issues. Predictions for 2006 will be made later in 2005.
John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what additional funding will be available for financial year 200506 to the Probation Service for the introduction of generic sentences. 
Paul Goggins: The Halliday Report ("Making Punishments Work"), which reviewed the sentencing framework of England and Wales, was published in July 2001. The report recognised the need for widespread changes to the sentencing structure. The Government's response was set out in the 2002 White Paper "Justice for All". The Criminal Justice Act 2003 made radical changes to the sentencing framework based heavily on Halliday's recommendations.
Tom Cox: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many female prisoners, held in HM Holloway prison, have (a) attempted suicide and (b) committed suicide in each of the last five years; and if he will make a statement. 
The reasons why people self-injure is complex, and it is difficult to distinguish between acts of self-harm that were attempts at ending life, and those which occurred for other reasons. It is not possible, therefore, for the Prison Service to determine from recorded incidents of self-harm those acts that could be
11 Jan 2005 : Column 300W
described as attempts at suicide. The following figures for self-harm include all acts of self-harm, however serious.
|Number of self-inflicted deaths(83)||Number of recorded incidents of self-harm(84)|
The prison population, and the female prison population in particular, includes a large number of individuals with a combination of psychiatric disorders, alcohol and drug dependency, family background and relationship problems, histories of self-harm and previous abuse, all of which raise their risk of suicide and self-harm. A targeted and separate suicide prevention and self-harm management strategy is being developed for women prisoners.
Holloway has a First Night in Custody Project that focuses on the needs of women at the vulnerable stage of entry into prison. The Project was established in October 2000 and is run by the Prisoner Advice and Care Trust. It employs a full-time project worker and two link workers to help identify women at risk of self-harm or suicide. The project sees over 100 prisoners a month and makes referrals to services in and outside the prison on housing needs, mental health problems, drug or alcohol problems.
David Davis: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many persons were recalled to custody having been released on home detention curfew in (a) each of the last 12 months and (b) each of the last five years. 
Paul Goggins: Prisoners who are subject to the Home Detention Curfew scheme can have their licences revoked under the powers available to the Secretary of State provided in sections 38A(1) and 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991. The reasons for revocation are as follows:
the curfewee had committed an offence or breached any other requirement of probation supervision (section 39 of the Criminal Justice Act 1991). Curfewees who are charged with a new offence may also be recalled on any of the preceding grounds depending upon the circumstances of the case.
The table gives a breakdown of the number of prisoners who have been recalled to prison while subject to the Home Detention Curfew scheme over the past five years and a monthly breakdown for the past 12 months. The total figure is broken down into the various
11 Jan 2005 : Column 302W
categories of recall as set out previously and includes those prisoners who have not breached the conditions of their licence, but whose whereabouts can no longer be electronically monitored following a change in their circumstances.
The increase in the number of recalls is an expected consequence of expanding the Home Detention Curfew scheme. Of the 100,345 prisoners placed on the scheme since January 1999, a total of 8,698 have had their licences revoked, which represents 8.7 per cent. of the total.
These statistics are based on information recorded on the central Prison Service IT system at week ending 24 October 2004. Further updates and amendments may be made to records on this system in future, resulting in revised figures.
|Breach of curfew||Inability to monitor||Risk of serious harm||Breach of probation supervision/charged with further offence||Total recalls|
|January to September 2004||1,332||538||0||493||2,363|
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|