|Previous Section||Index||Home Page|
David Davis: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many and what percentage of drug testing and treatment orders have been breached in each year since their introduction, broken down by local authority area. 
Paul Goggins: It is not possible to calculate accurately the total number or percentage of orders breached in any one year. Some orders made in one year were breached in the following year; some cases are subject to multiple breach proceedings; some breach proceedings have been instigated and not yet dealt with by the courts; and 7,640 orders (30 per cent. of the orders made since roll-out) are still running. A completion target for Drug Testing and Treatment Orders (DTTO) of 35 per cent. was introduced from April 2004. The overall completion rate between AprilOctober 2004 was 34 per cent. and each probation area's completion rate for the same period is shown in the table.
|Area name:||Target achieved(percentage)|
|West Midlands Region||34|
|North East Region||43|
|North West Region||37|
|Leicestershire and Rutland||40|
|East Midlands Region||37|
|Yorkshire and Humberside Region24|
|South East Region||29|
|Avon and Somerset||26|
|Devon and Cornwall||32|
|South West Region||32|
Mr. Byrne: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will set out the offences for which fixed penalty notices can be issued; and what guidance has been issued to authorities by his Department about circumstances in which such notices can be delivered. 
Ms Blears: The penalty notice for disorder scheme was extended by the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (Amendment) and Police Reform Act 2002 (Modification) Order 2004 (SI 2540/2004), made on 27 September this year, to add a further 10 offences to the existing 11 offences. A complete list of the offences and penalties is shown in the table.
Operational guidance is provided to the police on issuing penalty notices for disorder. This has been revised to take into account the new offences and will be published on the Home Office website shortly at: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/crimpol/police/penalty/index.html
|Offence creating provision||Description of offence|
|Offences attracting £80 penalty|
|Section 80 of the Explosives Act 1875(c.17)()||Throwing fireworks in a thoroughfare|
|Section 31 of the Fire Services Act 1947 (c.41)()||Knowingly giving a false alarm to a fire brigade|
|Section 169A of the Licensing Act 1964(c.26)||Sale of alcohol to a person under 18|
|Section 169C(2) and (3) of the Licensing Act 1964 (c.26)||Buying or attempting to buy alcohol for a person under 18|
|Section 169F of the Licensing Act 1964 (c.26)||Delivery of alcohol to a person under 18 or allowing such delivery|
|Section 5(2) of the Criminal Law Act1967(c.58)||Wasting police time or giving false report|
|Section 91 of the Criminal Justice Act 1 967 (c.80)||Disorderly behaviour while drunk in a public place|
|Section 1 of the Theft Act 1968 (c.60)||Theft|
|Section 1(1 ) of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 (c.48)||Destroying or damaging property|
|Section 5 of the Public Order Act1986 (c.64)||Behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress|
|Section 127(2) of the Communications Act 2003 (c.21)||Using a public electronic communications network in order to cause annoyance, inconvenience or needless anxiety|
|Section 11 of the Fireworks Act 2003 (c.22)||Contravention of a prohibition or failure to comply with a requirement imposed by or under fireworks regulations or making false statements|
|Section 49 of the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004 (C.21K)||Knowingly giving a false alarm to a person acting on behalf of a fire and rescue authority|
|Offences attracting £50 penalty|
|Section 12 of the Licensing Act 1872 (c.94)||Being drunk in a highway, other public place or licensed premises|
|Section 55 of the British Transport Commission Act 1949 (c.xxix)||Trespassing on a railway|
|Section 56 of the British Transport Commission Act 1949 (c.xxix)||Throwing stones etc. at trains or other things on railways|
|Section 168E of the Licensing Act 1964 (c.26)||Consumption of alcohol by a person under 18 or allowing such consumption|
|Section 87 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 (c.43)||Depositing and leaving litter|
|Section 12 of the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001 (c.16)||Consumption of alcohol in designated public place|
Mr. Lilley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the source is of the figure that about 35 per cent. of terrorists use false or multiple identities, as referred to in the answer of 17 May 2004, Official Report, column 773W, to the hon. Member for Bognor Regis and Littlehampton (Mr. Gibb). 
Mr. Browne [holding answer 10 January 2005]: During an oral evidence session to the Home Affairs Select Committee on 4 May 2004, the then Home Secretary my right hon. Friend, the Member for Sheffield, Brightside (Mr. Blunkett) said:
"I have been very circumspect and I have indicated what the security services have said to me, which is they believe that in excess of a third of those who are engaged in supporting terrorism use multiple identities in order to be able to evade detection and to evade us being able to disrupt their activities."
John Thurso: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many convictions which have resulted in custodial sentences there have been for (a) drink-driving and (b) other motoring offences, broken down by (i) type and (ii) gender in each year since 1997; and what each figure represents as a percentage of the total. 
Information taken from the Home Office court proceedings database on convictions and custodial sentences for drink-driving and other motoring offences by gender 1997 to 2002 (latest
12 Jan 2005 : Column 546W
available) is given in tables, which have been placed in the Library. Data for 2003 will be available early in 2005.
Paul Goggins: Having initially agreed to accept my invitation to join the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Board, Ms Judy McKnight (General Secretary of NAPO) and Mr. Colin Moses (National Chairman of POA) recently announced their resignation.
I have made it clear that I strongly support regular and open dialogue with Trade Unions as part of the development of NOMS. The NOMS Joint Consultative Council (JCC) provides a forum for communication, discussion, consultation and information sharing between the NOMS and the Trade Unions representing staff within the National Probation Service, Her Majesty's Prison Service and the core Home Office on those issues that fall outside the remits of the existing service-specific consultation frameworks.
|Next Section||Index||Home Page|