Previous Section Index Home Page

17 Jan 2005 : Column 748W—continued

Initiatives (Funding)

Mr. Andrew Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what budget was allocated to the (a) Correctional Services Board, (b) National Offender Management Service, (c) Anti-Social Behaviour Action Group, (d) National Victims Advisory Panel, (e) Police Leadership Development Board, (f) National Asylum Support Forum, (g) Action Against Crime Business Group and (h) Sentencing Guidelines Council in each of the last two years; and how many staff each organisation employed in each year. [201729]


 
17 Jan 2005 : Column 749W
 

Paul Goggins: The information requested is as follows:

(a) The Correctional Services Board ceased to exist following the creation of the National Offender Management Service on 1 June 2004. It did not have a dedicated full-time staff, the secretariat function being met by Correctional Services staff. The Board's budget of £70,000 in the financial year 2003–04 was for the expenses of its non-executive members.

(b) The National Offender Management Service (NOMS) came into existence on 1 June 2004. The total budget for the elements that make up NOMS was £3.29 billion resource and £0.31 billion capital in April 2004. As the structure of NOMS has not been finalised it is not yet possible to give the number of staff employed.

(c) The Anti-Social Behaviour Action Group had a budget of £25 million in the financial year 2003–04 and £24 million in 2004–05. On average, the Group employed 27 staff.

(d) There was no formal budget allocation for the National Victims Advisory Panel in the financial year 2003–04, but £10,000 of its non-pay running costs was found from Home Office funds. There was a budget of £20,000 for 2004–05. The Panel does not have a dedicated secretariat. Four Home Office staff oversee the administration and running of the Panel, although this is only part of their work.

(e) The Police Leadership Development Board (PLDB) was established in 2001 and is chaired by HM Inspector of Constabulary. It oversees a programme of work to promote and develop effective leadership across the police service, which is delivered by the Home Office, the police service and its training and development providers. It has no budget or staff. Programme costs are met by the Home Office.

(f) The National Asylum Support Forum is a regular meeting at which representatives from key stakeholder groups discuss current and future issues in Asylum Support. Costs to the Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) of contributing to not been finalised it is not yet possible to give the number of staff employed.

(g) The Anti-Social Behaviour Action Group had a budget of £25 million in the financial year 2003–04 and £24 million in 2004–05. On average, the Group employed 27 staff.

(h) The Sentencing Guidelines Council was appointed in March 2004, and shares a secretariat with the Sentencing Advisory Panel. The budget for the Council and Panel in the financial year 2003–04 was £0.546 million and during that time the Secretariat increased from three staff to the current level of 14 staff to support the new body. The budget allocated to the Council and Panel in 2004–05 is £0.909 million.

National Offender Management Service

John McDonnell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what plans have been developed for qualifications, training and career development for the National Offender Management Service. [204970]


 
17 Jan 2005 : Column 750W
 

Paul Goggins: Planning has begun on the creation of a learning and development strategy for National Offender Management Service (NOMS). Working closely with Skills for Justice (the Sector Skills Council for the justice sector) and regional probation training consortia, this strategy will identify new learning programmes and qualifications needed to support the development of NOMS.

As the offender management model is developed, a particular priority will be to define the competencies needed to undertake that role, and hence to develop learning programmes.

The Prison Service and the National Probation Service are also developing proposals for an integrated approach to leadership and management development for managers across NOMS. An early output will be the creation of a development programme for the 10 Regional Offender Managers.

Passports

Mr. Oaten: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department what the timescale is for the inclusion of (a) facial, (b) fingerprint and (c) iris biometrics in passports. [206618]

Mr. Browne: The UK Passport Service currently plans to commence production of chip enabled passports containing a facial image by the last quarter in 2005.

We are at present considering the benefits and impacts of the possible introduction of fingerprint and/or iris biometrics. Unlike the facial biometrics, inclusion of either or both of these biometrics will require the personal attendance of all passport applicants. I have announced that adults applying for a passport for the first time will have to apply in person from the last quarter of 2006. However to require all applicants to apply in person and to record and store their additional biometrics would have a significant impact on UKPS operations and processes and a decision will not be taken on this until later in 2005.

Police

David Davis: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many stop and accounts were undertaken by the police per day on average in the last period for which figures are available. [203510]

Ms Blears: There is no data currently held centrally on Stop and Account procedures. The requirement to record all stops in line with recommendation 61 of the Stephen Lawrence inquiry becomes effective on April 1 2005.

Prison Service

Mr. Drew: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether the guidance set out in HM Treasury Green Book was followed in regard to the decision to reintroduce market testing to the Prison Service. [202690]

Paul Goggins: The guidance set out in Her Majesty's Treasury Green Book is to ensure that no programme is adopted without prior consideration of whether there are better ways of achieving the end result and better
 
17 Jan 2005 : Column 751W
 
uses for the resources involved. In his report "Managing Offenders, Reducing Crime" published in December 2003 Lord Carter of Coles recommended that market testing should be reintroduced on the basis that contestability demonstrates value for money in the delivery of cost effective correctional services. The Government accepted this recommendation in its response published in January 2004 "Reducing Crime—Changing Lives". Value for money in respect of a prisons market test is demonstrated through the evaluation of bids submitted by the private and public sectors.

Mr. Robathan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department (1) how many employees of the Prison Service have been disciplined for improper use of official cars since (a) 1997 and (b) 2001; [203641]

(2) how many prison officers have been disciplined since (a) 1997 and (b) 2001 for dishonest claims for travel allowances. [203651]

Paul Goggins [holding answer 9 December 2004]: The information required is not held centrally and could be obtained only at a disproportionate cost.

Prisons

Mrs. Gillan: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many prison cells were available for use at each prison establishment on the latest date for which figures are available; and how many prisoners could be housed in those cells. [206417]

Paul Goggins: The total number of prison cells and other accommodation is not recorded centrally. The standard unit of prison accommodation is the prison place, which includes cells, cubicles, dormitories, rooms or wards. When totalled, it represents the uncrowded capacity of a prison, or Certified Normal Accommodation (CNA).

The total number of prisoners that an establishment can hold in its accommodation is the prison's operational capacity. It is determined by area managers on the basis of operational judgement and experience, taking into account control, security and the proper operation of the planned regime.

Data on prison capacity in England and Wales, as at 26 November 2004 (the last date for which figures are available), is set out in the following table.
PrisonCNA placesOperational capacity
Acklington882882
Albany526526
Altcourse6141,024
Ashfield300300
Ashwell535545
Askham Grange151151
Aylesbury356372
Bedford325464
Belmarsh792921
Birmingham1001,400
Blakenhurst641880
Blantyre House122122
Blundeston420464
Brinsford477493
Bristol426606
Brixton606798
Brockhill14548
Bronzefield451451
BuckleyHall350385
Bullingdon759963
Bullwood Hall180184
Camp Hill513585
Canterbury196314
Cardiff525754
Castington400410
Channings Wood634667
Chelmsford446575
Coldingley370390
CookhamWood12168
Dartmoor598625
Deerbolt513518
Doncaster7711,120
Dorchester143250
Dovegate858858
Dover(10)316316
Downview210210
Drake Hall315315
Durham552787
East Sutton Park94100
Eastwood Park310346
Edmunds Hill308310
Elmley763985
Erlestoke426426
Everthorpe437469
Exeter316533
Featherstone599615
Feltham761761
Ford541541
Forest Bank8001,064
Foston Hall267274
Frankland693709
Full Sutton596608
Garth633667
Gartree399404
Glen Parva668808
Gloucester229328
Grendon241235
Guys Marsh519570
Haslar(10)123123
Haverigg554564
Hewell Grange167170
Highdown643747
Highpoint792816
Hindley539539
Hollesley Bay330330
Holloway522522
Holme House857994
Hull8121,071
Huntercombe36368
Kingston138140
Kirkham588590
Kirklevington223223
Lancaster98180
Lancaster Farms480527
Latchmere House207207
Leeds8061,254
Leicester191355
Lewes442529
Leyhill508508
Lincoln307490
Lindholme(10)784784
Littlehey654696
Liverpool1,1861,476
Long Lartin442442
Low Newton343396
Lowdham Grange504524
Maidstone548548
Manchester9541,269
Moorland740779
Moorland Open260260
Morton Hall391392
Mount704760
New Hall367426
North Sea Camp307307
Northallerton153254
Norwich583811
Nottingham385510
Onley580580
Parc859136
Parkhurst459507
Pentonville8891,205
Portland447472
Frescoed160170
Preston33162
Ranby760858
Reading186289
Risley10381,073
Rochester392392
Rye Hill600664
Send219219
Shepton Mallet163189
Shrewsbury168300
Spring Hill318318
Stafford680680
Standford Hill464464
Stocken595622
Stoke Heath574690
Styal406457
Sudbury551559
Swaleside756778
Swansea205348
Swinfen Hall431440
Thorn Cross31631
Usk150250
Verne552587
Wakefield561565
Wandsworth9951,462
Warren Hill222222
Wayland657709
Wealstun842892
Weare398398
Wellingborough516526
Werrington146148
Wetherby342342
Whatton341360
Whitemoor450450
Winchester437655
Wolds310360
Woodhill650762
Wormwood Scrubs1,1671,239
Wymott1,0211,046


(10) Dover and Haslar in their entirety and 112 of Lindholme's places are designated Immigration Removal Centres (IRCs), which are managed by the Prison Service on behalf of Immigration and Nationality Directorate.



 
17 Jan 2005 : Column 753W
 


Next Section Index Home Page