Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
Peter Bottomley: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will lift the certificate of fast tracking in respect of the case of Mr. Crispen Kulinji, appeal reference AS/18370/2004; if he will arrange for Mr. Kulinji to have access to experienced competent legal advice; what information is available to the department regarding abduction and torture, in respect of Mr. Kulinji; if he will arrange for Mr. Kulinji's release from the holding centre; and if he will grant permission for Mr. Kulinji to remain in this country. [201911]
Mr. Browne: Information on individual cases is confidential and cannot be divulged without the express consent of the individual concerned.
Mr. Fisher: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) males and (b) females aged 15 to 17 received custodial sentences in each year since 1997. [209913]
Paul Goggins: The information requested is contained in the following table.
Statistics for 2004 will be published in the autumn.
Mr. Fisher: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many (a) males and (b) females aged 15 to 17 sentenced in each year since 1997 served their sentences more than 50 miles from their parents' homes. [209914]
Paul Goggins: The available information is in the following table. The figures were supplied by the Youth Justice Board and relate to persons placed more than 50miles from their recorded home address. Information is not available for the years 199799.
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether his Department has conducted a risk assessment of (a) the implementation of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, (b) the timing of the introduction of the National Offender Management Service and (c) the reorganisation of the courts. [209650]
Paul Goggins: Risk assessments have been carried out on implementation of Criminal Justice Act 2003 (CJA) and the National Offender Management Service (NOMS) Change Programme. They considered the risks to the programme posed by a variety of factors, including timing and considered the likelihood and consequences of any such risks materialising. The resulting risk registers also detail the actions required to ensure that the consequences of any risk is minimised. These actions are being taken forward by the appropriate Directors. Risk management is supported by the NOMS Programme Office and overseen by the NOMS Programme and Executive Board. These feed into wider Home Office risk management procedures.
A Risk Assessment on the re-organisation of the courts has been carried out by the Department for Constitutional Affairs (DCA). The DCA established the Unified Courts Administration Programme (UCAP) to implement the re-organisation of the courts and to manage associated risks at area and regional levels. Risk registers are considered on a continuous review basis, and appropriate actions taken, by Directors at all levels of the organisation. Risk management is overseen, on behalf of the DCA, by UCAP and its Transitional Management Group.
Andrew Mackinlay: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will make a statement on Scotland Yard's Anti-Corruption Squad's investigation into the circumstances leading to the wrongful conviction of Erkin Guney; when the investigation is expected to be concluded; when the results are expected to be presented to the Crown Prosecution Service; when Mr. Guney will be advised of progress; and if he will make a statement. [205533]
Ms Blears: Erkin Guney was investigated and convicted on 23 July 1996 for possession of heroin with intent to supply and illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition. He received a 14 year prison sentence. Mr.Guney appealed three times against conviction and, on his third attempt in 2003, his appeal was upheld; grounds of an unsafe conviction were cited.
I am advised by the Independent Police Complaints Commission (IPCC) that on 23 July 2003 Mr. Guney made a complaint against the police for failing to investigate threats to kill him and for acting dishonestly in gathering information that led to his arrest and prosecution. The MPS referred the complaint to the Police Complaints Authority (PCA) who agreed to supervise an MPS investigation into that complaint. The IPCC took over the supervision of the case on 1 April 2004 from the PCA.
25 Jan 2005 : Column 273W
The investigation is continuing but, given the length it has been running, the IPCC has requested that the Investigating Officer's final report be completed by mid-February. On receipt of the report, the IPCC will review the case and, if it is satisfied with the conduct of the investigation, the investigation will be closed.
On conclusion of the investigation, if the report indicates a criminal offence may have been committed, a copy of the report will be sent to the Crown Prosecution Service.
The IPCC wrote to the complainant's solicitors on 14 January 2005 with an update on the current position and will continue to report progress to Mr. Guney until the matter is concluded.
Mr. Amess: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department how many days working at usual duties were lost in each year since 1997 due to police officers in the Essex Constabulary attending court cases; and if he will make a statement. [207752]
Ms Blears: Information on the number of working days Essex police officers spent attending court cases each year since 1997 has not been collected.
Mr. Byrne: To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department if he will list the offences for which fixed penalty notices can be issued by (a) police constables and (b) police community support officers. [208780]
Ms Blears:
Police officers can issue fixed penalty notices under the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 for around 150 different offences which are listed in Schedule 3 to the Act. In addition the following offences have been added to the scheme since September 2000:
25 Jan 2005 : Column 274W
No MOT contrary to s47 of the Road Traffic Act 1988; No insurance contrary to s143 of the Road Traffic Act 1988;
Failure to supply details necessary to identify an offending driver contrary to s172 of the Road Traffic Act 1988; Overtaking a stationary or moving vehicle in the controlled area of a toucan crossing contrary to Regulation 28 of the Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002 (TSRGD); Stopping in the controlled area of a toucan crossing contrary to Regulation 27 of the TSRGD; Failing to wear prescribed types of authorised eye protectors when driving or riding a motor bicycle contrary contrary to the Motor Cycles (eye Protectors) Regulations 1999.
The police also have the power to issue fixed penalty notices for disorder as provided for in the Criminal Justice and Police Act 2001. The table lists the offences currently included in the scheme.
Community support officers have the power of a constable to issue penalty notices for disorder except for the offences of theft and littering. In addition they have the power of a constable to issue fixed penalty notices for the offence of riding on a footway under s72 of the Highway Act.
They also have the power of an authorised officer of a local authority to issue fixed penalty notices for an offence of dog fouling under s4 of the Dog (Fouling of Land) Act 1996, for littering under s88 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990 and for offences of fly posting or graffiti under s43 of the Anti-social Behaviour Act 2003.
Community support officers can issue road traffic fixed penalty notices only where they have additionally been designated by the Chief Constable as traffic wardens.
The police and community support officers also have the power to issue fixed penalty notices for truancy, although these notices are normally issued by education welfare officers.
Next Section | Index | Home Page |