| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
PRIME MINISTER
Honours System
The Prime Minister (Mr. Tony Blair): The Government's decisions on changes to the honours system are contained in the Command Paper "Reform of the Honours System" (Cm 6479) which has been published today. Copies are being placed in the Libraries of the House.
TRANSPORT
Motorcycling
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Transport (Mr. David Jamieson): I have today published the Government's national motorcycling strategy. It is the first Government motorcycling strategy and it covers the whole range of issues which apply to motorcycling—suitable infrastructure, traffic management measures, motorcycle design, safety issues including improved training arrangements, and taxation.
The strategy sets out a framework of actions to be pursued over the next few years, principally by central Government, local government, the motorcycle industry and motorcycle user groups, to ensure that motorcycling becomes fully recognised and catered for as a mode of transport on our roads.
Copies of the strategy have been placed in the Libraries of both Houses.
22 Feb 2005 : Column 16WS
WORK AND PENSIONS
Open Method of Co-ordination
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Mr. Chris Pond): A consultation exercise has been launched today on the evaluation of the EU process called the "open method of co-ordination". This provides a structure for co-operation between EU member states to enable the exchange of best practice and joint evaluation of policies. The European Commission has invited all EU member states to comment on the effectiveness of this open method in the fields of social inclusion and pensions. The questionnaire has been placed in the Library and is also available online at www.dwp.gov.uk/consultations/2005/omc/index.asp.
The Government are inviting comments from non-governmental organisations involved with social inclusion or pensions, TUC and CBI and local and regional government to contribute to the UK response. The consultation closes on 30 April to enable a UK response to be drawn up in time for the Commission deadline of 30 June.
Financial Assistance Scheme
The Minister for Pensions (Malcolm Wicks): In December 2004 we said that our priority was getting help to those facing the most urgent difficulties being closest to, or already at, retirement age and therefore less able to make provision to replace their lost pensions.
At that time we had asked independent trustees to provide data on the pension schemes that they thought might be eligible for the financial assistance scheme. We had a very good response and from the information provided it appears that there are at least 380 schemes in which members might be potentially eligible for financial assistance. The precise scale of the financial shortfalls in these schemes cannot be known until the winding-up processes are close to completion.
A list of these potentially eligible schemes has been placed in the Library. It is a provisional list which broadly confirms earlier estimates of the scale of the problem, and the number of individuals affected. The detailed eligibility criteria for both schemes and members will be set out in regulations that we expect to publish for wider consultation in the spring. Once finalised these will need parliamentary approval, which we hope to obtain by the end of July.
As solvent employers have a duty to support their schemes and provide the benefits members were expecting, it is right that the FAS focuses on insolvent employers. We expect employers to stand by their pension promise to their employees, and will take a dim view of the solvent employer who seeks to avoid their responsibilities to their employees or the employees of a company for which they have been a parent company. We have consulted widely on how we should define 'employer insolvency' and concluded that for FAS purposes we should have a sufficiently general definition of insolvency to capture schemes where the sponsoring employer no longer exists and also where insolvency may have occurred some time after scheme wind-up had
22 Feb 2005 : Column 17WS
started. This definition will be similar to that used by the PPF but with the additional inclusion of some companies which have undergone members' voluntary liquidations—where a declaration of solvency was made at the time of wind-up but where the company is now no longer solvent and so no employer exists to support the scheme.
We are minded to judge the insolvency position for multi-employer schemes on the principal employer of the scheme.
The list contains those pension schemes on which we received information in the latest data collection exercise and which from the information provided by trustees, appear potentially eligible under the criteria set out above. The list provides an early indication of scheme eligibility for members of the schemes we have been told about. But I need to make clear a number of caveats. First, it will take time to establish the final position, but as wind-up progresses we will become clearer on the size of the gap between assets and liabilities of these schemes. Second, presence on this list does not guarantee individuals will receive support from the FAS. Third, it does not mean trustees should stop their duties of securing the best possible outcome for their scheme members.
After the FAS regulations have come into force, there will be a six-month period during which we shall accept formal notification from the independent trustees of other under-funded pension schemes, which may in due course be added to the list, so absence from this list does not preclude eligibility.
Whilst we have sought industry contributions, it is very disappointing that no financial contribution has been forthcoming. As a result the available funding stands at £400 million over 20 years, which the Government have committed on behalf of the taxpayer.
22 Feb 2005 : Column 18WS
As we have explained before, in many cases the trustees are not yet able to provide detailed information on the scale of individual losses and in practice this may not be available until they are close to completing the winding-up of each pension scheme.
But those scheme members who have already retired or expect to retire within the next few years need to know where they stand now.
I can therefore announce today that the financial assistance scheme will provide help to those within three years of their scheme pension age on 14 May 2004. The assistance will top up individuals to a level broadly equivalent to 80 per cent. of the core pension rights accrued in their scheme. That means that those within three years of their pension scheme age on 14 May 2004 should expect to get 80 per cent. of their core promised pension. As we previously announced, payments will be subject to a de minimis level and a cap on assistance provided. Further information on these will be provided when the draft regulations are published.
The assistance will be paid as a monthly pension.
FAS payments will be treated by the tax and benefit system in broadly the same way as payments from an occupational pension scheme.
We have already committed ourselves to review the financial assistance scheme after three years.
Government funding is already fixed for the current spending review period up to and including 2007–08. But as with all our spending plans, we will review the funding for the FAS in the next spending review alongside other spending priorities.
A dedicated team of DWP officials, based in York, will administer the scheme and aim to get payments to recipients as soon as possible once the regulations are in place.
22 Feb 2005 : Column 19WS
PRIVY COUNCIL OFFICE
Supplementary Estimates
The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Constitutional Affairs (Mr. David Lammy): Subject to parliamentary approval of any necessary supplementary estimate, the Privy Council Office DEL will be increased by £466,000 from £4,195,000 to £4,661,000 and the gross administration costs limit will be increased by £466,000 from £4,158,000 to £4,624,000. Within the DEL change, the impact on resources and capital is as set out in the following table:
| New DEL | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Change | Voted | Non-voted | Total | |
| Resource | 466,000 | 4,624,000 | 0 | 4,624,000 |
| Capital | 0 | 69 | 0 | 69 |
| Depreciation* | 0 | -32 | 0 | -32 |
| Total | 466,000 | 4,661,000 | 0 | 4,661,000 |
*Depreciation, which forms part of resource DEL, is excluded from total DEL since capital DEL includes capital spending and to include depreciation of those assets would lead to double counting.
The change in the resource element of the DEL arises from take up of Privy Council Office's end year flexibility.
The Privy Council Office is also looking to increase spending by £70,000 to offset increases in administrative expenditure. This increase is offset by appropriations in aid.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |