Previous Section Index Home Page

24 Feb 2005 : Column 794W—continued

Nordic Customs Union

Miss McIntosh: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what assessment she has made of the operation of the Nordic Customs Union in relation to the proposed restrictions on Norwegian imports of salmon into the EU. [216701]

Mr. Alexander: None, the Nordic Customs Union does not exist. The provisions of the European Economic Area apply to the movement of goods between Norway and member states of the European Union.

Parental Leave

Mr. Sheerman: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what changes to paternity and maternity leave have been introduced since 1997. [217464]

Mr. Sutcliffe: In 1999 we extended maternity leave for all employed women from 14 weeks to 18 weeks. The qualifying service for additional maternity leave was reduced to one year. Previously qualifying service was two years for women working at least 16 hours per week or five years for women working between eight and sixteen hours per week.

Leave was further simplified and extended in April 2003. All employed women are now entitled to 26 weeks' ordinary maternity leave. Women with six months qualifying service are able to take a further 26 weeks' additional maternity leave.

The right to paid paternity leave was introduced in April 2003. Eligible fathers can choose to take one or two weeks' paternity leave in the first eight weeks after their child is born.

Regional Development Agencies

Mrs. Spelman: To ask the Secretary of State for Trade and Industry what the estimated Government expenditure by regional development agencies is expected to be in 2004–05; and what expenditure is projected for 2005–06. [211137]

Jacqui Smith: I have set out in the following table the planned expenditure by each of England's nine Regional Development Agencies in 2004–05 and their indicative allocations for 2005–06.
£ million

2004–052005–06
Advantage West Midlands235272
East of England Development Agency91129
East Midlands Development Agency138156
London Development Agency327373
North West Development Agency226382
One North East365240
South East of England Development Agency128157
South West of England Development Agency111153
Yorkshire Forward284295
Total(10)1,9052,157


(10) The RDA budget for 2005–06 following SR2004 was £2.163 billion. That figure excluded £21 million non-cash cost provision. The Office of the Deputy Prime Minister has since changed the profile of their contribution to RDAs so that the RDAs overall allocations is reduced by £26 million in 2005–06 and increased by £14 million in 2006–07 and £12 million 2007–08.



 
24 Feb 2005 : Column 795W
 

CONSTITUTIONAL AFFAIRS

Appointments

Paddy Tipping: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs pursuant to his Answer of 9 February to Question reference 215189, if he will break down the figures provided in tables 1A, 1B and 2 by gender. [216945]

Mr. Lammy: The breakdown of the figures provided in the answer on 9 February 2005, Official Report, column 1609W (and in my pursuant answer yesterday) are detailed in the following tables.

Tables 1A and 1B show full-time appointments for the calendar years 1975–97. The figures include appointments of Judicial officers to full time Tribunal posts for Tribunals administered by DCA (formerly Lord Chancellor's Department) but exclude those administered by other Government Departments (such as the Employment Tribunal and The Appeal Service and its pre 1999 predecessor The Independent Tribunal Service). These tables also include lay magistrates appointments from 1990 onwards.

Figures for the appointment and the gender split of part time judicial officers between 1975 and 1997, and for lay magistrates prior to 1990 is not given, as DCA does not hold complete figures on the appointment and gender of these judicial officers who were appointed during these periods, and those that exist could only be determined at disproportionate cost.

The gender split for full-time and part-time judicial officer appointments for each year between 1998–2004 is set out in tables 2A-D. These figures are obtained from the Judicial Appointments Annual Reports to Parliament for each of the financial years from 1998–2004.

It is also necessary to mention that while every care has been taken, the figures supplied for the years 1975–98 may not be wholly complete as they are drawn
 
24 Feb 2005 : Column 796W
 
from very old records. For some of the very early appointments, the DCA have only a surname and initials thus it is not absolutely certain what the gender was, and in these cases, on the basis that there were very few women in the judiciary that long ago, it has been assumed that they are men.
Table 1A: 1975–84 full-time appointments

MaleFemaleTotal
1975–97 full-time appointments gender split
197544145
197645146
197741243
197854357
197936339
198062365
198139241
198250353
198347148
198461162

Table 1B: 1985–94 full-time and lay magistrates appointments

MaleFemaleTotal
198550353
198678482
198752254
198859160
198949554
199049655
199185792
199210515120
199311215127
1994761591
19959317110
1996919100
1997551166
Lay magistrates
1985n/an/a
1986n/an/a
1987n/an/a
1988n/an/a
1989n/an/a
19909961,0632,059
19911,0081,0092,017
19921,0809902,070
19931,0451,0172,062
19948107831,593
19959079361,843
19968308521,682
19977648091,573

Tables 2A-D 1998–99 to 2003–04 full-time, part-time (fee paid) and lay magistrates appointments

1998–991999–20002000–012001–022002–032003–04
Table 2A: full-time appointments gender split
Male118741559412595
Female302143313131
Total14895198125156126
Table 2B: part-time appointments gender split
Male367264390507358227
Female119105165283183127
Total486369555790541354
Table 2C: Lord Chancellor lay magistrates appointments (excluding Duchy of Lancaster)
Male654692703763714777
Female624731663711696701
Total1,2781,4231,3661,4741,4101,478
Table 2D: lay magistrates appointments in the Duchy of Lancaster
Malen/an/a132164124152
Femalen/an/a12014889128
Total252312213280

 
24 Feb 2005 : Column 797W
 

Parental Contact Orders

Mrs. May: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs pursuant to the answer of 12 January 2005, Official Report, column 568W, on parental contract orders, how many of the 67,184 cases of disputed contact dealt with by the courts in 2003 were related to previous contact orders made in the same year. [217388]

Mr. Lammy: This information is not held centrally and could be provided only at disproportionate cost.

However, I would refer the right hon. Member to the Consultation Paper "Relationship Breakdown: Children's Needs and Parent's Responsibilities" (page14) where it confirms that "in just over half of the 300 cases surveyed as part of my Department Consumer Strategy work, there was at least one repeat application". It should be noted that this figure was, however, based on a limited sample in three courts and was just a snapshot at one point in time (the survey was carried out during February 2004). It is not known how many of the repeat orders related to previous orders in the same year.

It is important to note that not all repeat applications indicate conflict. It is common for orders to be revised to recognise a geographical move, change in working hours, or children getting older and needing different arrangements.


Next Section Index Home Page