| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1373W—continued
European Commission
Kate Hoey: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs how much his Department spent on information outlets in partnership with the European Commission and its UK representation in relation to EC budget line 16 05 01 in each of the last five financial years; and how much is budgeted to be spent in the 2005–06 financial year. [218751]
Mr. MacShane: None and nothing.
European Constitution
Angus Robertson: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer of 17 January 2005, Official Report, column 703W, on the European Union, what assessment the Government have made of whether the National Assembly for Wales, the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly, could be construed as national parliaments under the terms of Article 6 of Protocol 2 of the EU Constitutional Treaty. [218537]
Mr. MacShane:
The Government believes that the National Assembly for Wales, the Scottish Parliament and the Northern Ireland Assembly are not national parliaments" for the purposes of that Article.
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1374W
Mr. Austin Mitchell: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what steps his Department will take to promote the proposed EU constitution; when its actions will commence; and how much his Department will spend on promotion of the proposed constitution. [218538]
Mr. MacShane: For the financial year 2004–05, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office budget for informing the public about the EU, including about the constitutional treaty, is £613,000. A range of materials communicating the facts about the EU and the new treaty will be produced. A Guide to the European Union, which included information about the new treaty, was published recently. Additionally, I make regular visits around the country to discuss European issues with the public.
Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the remit is of the EU Constitution Team; what the budget for the EU Constitution Team (a) is in 2004–05 and (b) was in 2003–04; and how many staff work in the EU Constitution Team. [218647]
Mr. MacShane: The EU Constitution Team of 14 staff leads on managing the passage of the EU Bill through Parliament, policy on the EU constitutional treaty and EU communications work. It has a programme budget of £613,000 for financial year 2004–05. The EU Constitution Team did not exist in 2003–04 as the EU constitutional treaty was only agreed at the June 2004 European Council.
Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the planned timetable for appointing the agencies for partnership marketing and e-communications to promote the European Constitution is. [218813]
Mr. MacShane: A partnership marketing agency, Iris, was appointed on 11 February 2005 through a competitive tendering process. We hope to appoint an agency to help with online information in mid March. The objective of this work is to provide factual information about the EU and the proposed EU constitutional treaty.
Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs pursuant to the answer of 8 February 2005, Official Report, column 1454W, on the European constitution, whether the external companies appointed to promote the constitution will be contractually required to ensure that the information they give is objective. [218814]
Mr. MacShane: The work of external companies in communicating the EU and proposed EU constitutional treaty is managed by the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO). Contracts are with Central Office of Information Communications following standard guidelines. All output by external agencies must be cleared with the FCO. The FCO works to ensure that all information it issues on the subject of the EU and the EU constitutional treaty is objective and explanatory.
Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs from what budget within his Department the contracts for the external companies promoting the European constitution are being met. [218815]
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1375W
Mr. MacShane: Europe directorate meets the costs of hiring external companies to inform the public about the EU, including about the proposed EU constitutional treaty.
Mr. Hopkins: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs which unit within his Department is responsible for deciding the terms of reference for the external companies promoting the European constitution. [218816]
Mr. MacShane: The work of external companies in communicating the EU and proposed EU constitutional treaty is managed by the Europe directorate. Contracts are with Central Office of Information Communications following standard guidelines.
Kate Hoey: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs for what reasons the Electoral Commission may not designate a permitted participant in the referendum on the EU Constitution as referred to in paragraph 59 of the Explanatory Notes to the European Union Bill. [219274]
Mr. Leslie: Sections 108(2)(b) and 109(4) and (5) of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000 provide for the circumstances under which the Electoral Commission may not designate a permitted participant as a campaign representative. The Electoral Commission shall designate a permitted participant to be a campaign representative in relation to each outcome unless they are not satisfied that in both cases there is an applicant who adequately represents those campaigning for the outcome.
Kate Hoey: To ask the Parliamentary Secretary, Department for Constitutional Affairs on what grounds it would be possible to seek a judicial review of the result of the referendum on the EU Constitution. [219275]
Mr. Leslie: Clause 8 of the European Union Bill provides that a legal challenge to the referendum result may only be brought by proceedings for a judicial review commenced within six weeks of the certified result.
It would be for the court to determine if there were grounds for a judicial review, if sought.
Falkland Islands
Vera Baird: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs (1) what recent discussions he has had with his counterpart in the Government of Argentina about charter flights for cruise ship passenger transfers to the Falkland Islands; [218728]
(2) whether he has made representations to the Government of Argentina following the revocation of permission for charter flights to the Falkland Islands for cruise ship passenger transfers; and if he will make a statement. [218835]
Mr. Rammell
[holding answer 1 March 2005]: I met the Argentine Foreign Minister Bielsa in the margins of the international aid conference on support for Colombia in Cartagena. The subject of charter flights was discussed. The situation on this issue remains unchanged from that given in my statement to the hon. Member for Boston and Skegness (Mr. Simmonds) on 18 November 2004, Official Report, column 1782W.
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1376W
General Affairs and External Relations Council
Mr. Hood: To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs what the outcome was of the General Affairs and External Relations Council held on 21 February; what the Government's stance was on the issues discussed, including its voting record; and if he will make a statement. [218156]
Mr. MacShane: The information is as follows:
Outcome of the 21 February 2005 General Affairs and External Relations Council
My right hon. Friend the Foreign Secretary, John Grant (UK Permanent Representative to the EU) and I represented the UK at the General Affairs and External Relations Council (GAERC) in Brussels on 21 February 2005.
Conclusions were agreed on the Middle East, Iraq, Western Balkans, Ukraine and Sudan.
Preparations for the European Council—22/23 March, Brussels
The presidency introduced the draft agenda for the March European Council. The European Council will discuss the mid-term review of the Lisbon agenda, reform of the Stability and Growth Pact, sustainable development and international issues. The next meeting of the GAERC on 16 March will or prepare discussions in detail.
The Council had an exchange of views on competitiveness for growth and employment (spending on Lisbon-related objectives). The Government argued that the budget needed to be determined according to rigorous prioritisation and clear EU value added. The Government also argued, along with other supporters of an overall 1 per cent. GNI budget package, that the proposed budget (a threefold increase) was far too high. All member states endorsed research and development as a general priority but with different emphases on where EU value-added lay. Most member states expressed deep scepticism about the proposed Growth Adjustment Fund. The next meeting of the GAERC on 16 March will have a broader discussion of progress in the overall future financing negotiation.
The Council discussed the recent political developments in the MEPP, including the outcomes from the Sharm al-Sheik meeting and the Israeli Government's formal decision to implement the disengagement plan, which includes withdrawal of settlements from Gaza and part of the West Bank. The UK thanked the presidency, High Representative Solana, Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner and member states for their support for the 1 March London Meeting and explained the aim of the meeting was to assist the Palestinian leadership in building the institutions for a viable state. The focus would be on economic, governance and security institutions. The Council also discussed the importance of implementing UNSCR 1559 and condemned the attack which killed former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri.
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1377W
The Council discussed strengthening the EU's relations with Iraq following last month's successful elections and agreed a package of measures to that end. These include an integrated ESDP Rule of Law Mission (EUJUST LEX) with a liaison office in Baghdad, continued assistance with the elections process, provision of constitutional experts, intensified activity on capacity building in Iraqi Ministries particularly in the trade and energy sectors, and a commitment to an EU Troika visit to Iraq and a Joint Political Declaration to frame future co-operation, as soon as the Iraqi Transitional Government is in place and political developments allow. There was also discussion on the effective co-ordination of international reconstruction assistance to the Iraqi administration based on a French proposal. The UK welcomed the French proposal and thanked member states and the Commission for their constructive approach. There was much the EU could now do to help nurture Iraq's new government and the continuing political process.
The UN Secretary-General's Special Representative, Soren Jessen-Petersen, joined Ministers for a discussion on Kosovo. The Council offered Mr. Petersen its support for his work to implement UN Security Council Resolution 1244. It noted that the Review of UN-endorsed Standards would take place in mid-2005. If positive, this Review would pave the way for a process to determine Kosovo's final status. The Council expressed hope that the Provisional Institutions of Self Government would continue implementation of Standards to allow a positive assessment. The Council encouraged Belgrade to engage constructively on Kosovo. It reaffirmed that the future of the Western Balkans—including Kosovo—was within the European Union; the EU would therefore have an important future role to play. The Council emphasised that Kosovo's future must be consistent with the principles of multi-ethnic democracy. The UK supported this assessment of the road ahead, agreeing that the UN would remain in the lead in Kosovo but that the EU would also have an important role to play.
The Council also discussed Croatia and adopted Conclusions which set out clearly that Croatia must co-operate fully with the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia if accession negotiations are to open on 17 March.
Ministers briefly discussed the EU meeting with President Bush on 22 February with the presidency stressing the need for strict discipline on both the length and substance of interventions at the 22 February meeting.
After a brief discussion, the Council agreed Conclusions based on the 10 point package presented to the GAERC on 31 January by Commissioner Ferrero-Waldner. The package consists of 10 concrete steps to strengthen co-operation between the EU and Ukraine beyond the European Neighbourhood Action Plan which was also launched and endorsed by the EU-Ukraine Co-operation Council in the margins of the GAERC on 21 February.
3 Mar 2005 : Column 1378W
The Council discussed revisions to the text of the Cotonou Agreement (which governs EU relations with the African Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) states) and the accompanying financial package to succeed the ninth European Development Fund (EDF) in preparation for the EU/ACP ministerial meeting on 23 February 2005. Commissioner Michel briefed the Council of the latest state of play on negotiations of the text with the ACP. Differences between the two sides were now small and he was confident that agreement could be reached on 23 February. Agreement was also reached on the financial package with the retention of language on a performance review on which decisions about financing beyond the minimum agreed sum would be based. The flexibility in the language on the sunset clause setting 2007 as the final date for commitments of funds under the current EDF was also retained. Both are good outcomes for the UK.
The Council agreed Conclusions which call upon the Government of Sudan and the National Democratic Alliance to sign the full Cairo Agreement as soon as possible, note the Council's concerns about violations of the ceasefire and it's readiness to support measures agreed in the UN Security Council, and welcome the International Commission of Inquiry report on Darfur.
Belgian Foreign Minister De Gucht briefed the Council on his recent visit to the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC). He had two concerns. First, further problems could arise if no solution was found to the training of a unified army. Belgium had trained one unified brigade, and was helping with a second. But EU funding was required to support this. He hoped that a solution could be found by the time of the next GAERC. Second, election plans for the DRC were unrealistic. If a referendum on the constitution was held in July, as planned, elections could not take place until 2006. One solution would be to hold elections in July and for both houses of the provisional parliament to vote on a new constitution immediately thereafter. The presidency suggested that EU Africa Directors meet soon to discuss the two issues raised.
Lithuania called for the EU to do more to support democratisation, human rights and the independent media in Belarus. Lithuania informed the Council they would host a workshop in Vilnius on 18 March.
Spain stressed the importance of the EU's strategic relationship with the Mercosur countries. The presidency said they would strengthen work with a view to the EU/Mercosur meeting in May.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |