7 Mar 2005 : Column 1582Wcontinued
Disabled People (Battersea)
Martin Linton:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions how many people with disabilities in Battersea have returned to work in each of the last seven years. [218519]
Jane Kennedy:
Information on the number of disabled people who have benefited from the new deal programmes in Battersea is shown in the following table.
Number of disabled people who have entered work through the following new deal programmes in Battersea; new deal for young people; new deal 25 plus; new deal for lone parents;new deal 50 plus
| Individuals into work
|
October 1997-September 1998 | 0
|
October 1998-September 1999 | 30
|
October 1999-September 2000 | 30
|
October 2000-September 2001 | 30
|
October 2001-September 2002 | 20
|
October 2002-September 2003 | 40
|
October 2003-September 2004 | 20
|
Total | 170
|
Notes:
1.New deal for partners information is only available at national level.
2.New deal for young people started in January 1998; new deal 25plus started in July 1998; new deal for lone parents started in October 1998; new deal 50 plus started in April 2000.
3.New deal 50 plus information relates to the number of new deal 50 plus employment credit starts to March 2003. Information on the number of new deal 50 plus recorded job entries from April 2003 to September 2004 is not available at constituency level.
4.Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10.
Source:
New Deal Evaluation Database
Information on the new deal for disabled people is not available at constituency level so information has been provided for the Lambeth, Southwark and Wandsworth Jobcentre Plus district.
Number of disabled people who have entered work through the new deal for disabled people (NDDP) in the Lambeth, Southwark and Wandsworth Jobcentre Plus district
| Individuals into work
|
July 2001September 2001 | 0
|
October 2001September 2002 | 30
|
October 2002September 2003 | 130
|
October 2003September 2004 | 240
|
Total | 400
|
Notes:
1.NDDP individuals into work figures relate to the number of individuals gaining NDDP job broker jobs and individuals gaining NDDP Jobcentre Plus jobs.
2.The NDDP programme is available to people in receipt of a disability or health related benefit and started in July 2001.
3.Numbers are rounded to the nearest 10.
Source:
New Deal Evaluation Database
7 Mar 2005 : Column 1583W
In addition to new deal there are a number of programmes such as Access to Work, Work Preparation and WORKSTEP designed to help disabled people return to work. Details of the number of people helped to return to work through these programmes is not available at constituency or Jobcentre Plus district level.
Jobcentre Plus also offers interviews with a personal adviser to all disabled people making new or repeat claims to qualifying benefits to ensure they are aware of the help and opportunities available to them.
Financial Assistance Scheme
Mr. Waterson:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions what estimate he has made of the costs incurred by schemes in making data returns in relation to the Financial Assistance Scheme (FAS), broken down between those (a) that are on the list of those potentially eligible for inclusion in the FAS and (b) that are not. [219651]
7 Mar 2005 : Column 1584W
Malcolm Wicks:
No such estimate has been made. In practice the cost of providing the information requested will vary depending on the quality and availability of individual scheme records. Recognising this, we have sought to keep our requirements to a minimum and are very grateful for the extensive co-operation we have received from independent trustees scheme administrators and the assistance in kind provided by the pensions industry.
Five-year Strategy
Mr. Willetts:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will provide the figures on which the percentage national off-flow rates illustrated in Figure 13 on Page 46 of his Department's Five Year Strategy were based. [215531]
Maria Eagle:
The information is in the following table.
Four month incapacity benefit off-flow rate
| National
| Phase 1 pathways areas
|
Month of claim | Claims in month | Number leaving within four months | Percentage leaving within four months | Claims in month | Number leaving within four months | Percentage leaving within four months
|
2002 | | | | | |
|
April | 52,600 | 10,100 | 19 | 2,200 | 500 | 21
|
May | 53,200 | 9,800 | 18 | 2,300 | 500 | 21
|
June | 49,000 | 10,100 | 21 | 2,200 | 500 | 22
|
July | 54,300 | 11,300 | 21 | 2,300 | 500 | 23
|
August | 50,800 | 8,900 | 18 | 2,300 | 400 | 19
|
September | 52,200 | 9,700 | 19 | 2,300 | 500 | 20
|
October | 54,500 | 10,100 | 19 | 2,400 | 500 | 20
|
November | 54,800 | 12,400 | 23 | 2,400 | 600 | 24
|
December | 43,000 | 9,700 | 23 | 1,900 | 500 | 26
|
2003 | | | | | |
|
January | 62,200 | 13,400 | 22 | 2,700 | 700 | 25
|
February | 50,000 | 10,600 | 21 | 2,100 | 500 | 24
|
March | 53,500 | 10,800 | 20 | 2,300 | 500 | 22
|
April | 49,100 | 8,700 | 18 | 2,200 | 400 | 19
|
May | 51,000 | 9,800 | 19 | 2,200 | 500 | 20
|
June | 51,200 | 10,300 | 20 | 2,200 | 400 | 20
|
July | 52,700 | 10,500 | 20 | 2,200 | 500 | 24
|
August | 48,600 | 8,900 | 18 | 2,100 | 400 | 20
|
September | 52,200 | 9,200 | 18 | 2,200 | 400 | 20
|
October | 53,900 | 10,200 | 19 | 2,300 | 500 | 23
|
November | 50,000 | 9,900 | 20 | 2,100 | 600 | 28
|
December | 42,900 | 8,600 | 20 | 1,800 | 500 | 29
|
2004 | | | | | |
|
January | 56,300 | 10,100 | 18 | 2,500 | 700 | 28
|
February | 47,600 | 8,100 | 17 | 2,000 | 500 | 26
|
March | 53,600 | 9,700 | 18 | 2,400 | 600 | 27
|
April | 48,200 | 8,300 | 17 | 2,100 | 600 | 26
|
May | 46,500 | 7,800 | 17 | 2,000 | 500 | 26
|
June | 49,100 | 8,900 | 18 | 2,200 | 600 | 27
|
July(59) | 48,900 | 9,200 | 19 | 2,100 | 600 | 27
|
August(59) | 46,400 | 8,100 | 18 | 2,000 | 500 | 26
|
(59)Figures for July and August are provisional and are likely to be updated as more data becomes available.
Note:
The figures are produced from the Department's Working Age Statistical Database (WASD). WASD does not include a proportion of short-term incapacity benefit claims; therefore the off-flow rates presented will be lower than actual rates. However, trends over time and comparisons between areas will be consistent.
Intensive Activity Pilot
Mr. Boswell:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will list the private sector contractors supplying services relating to the intensive activity period pilot scheme for those aged between 50 and 59 years, broken down by jobcentre office areas. [220468]
Jane Kennedy:
The information is in the table.
7 Mar 2005 : Column 1585W
Private sector contractors in pilot locationsnew deal intensive activity 5059 pilot
Jobcentre Plus district | Training providers
|
Calderdale and Kirklees | CMS Vocational Training Limited Direct Training Limited S and S Training Services
|
Coventry and Warwickshire | CWT Focus Pathways JHP Group Limited Solutions (also known as Workworld).
|
East Lancashire | Training 2000 Limited
|
Essex | Seetec Business Technology Centre Limited
|
Hampshire | Bennington Training Services
|
The Marches | Training and Contracting Services Vale Training and Development
|
Dorset and Somerset | Paragon Training
|
Suffolk | Pelcombe Training Limited Seetec Business Technology Centre Limited
|
Derbyshire | Seetec Business Technology Centre Limited Spire
|
Highlands, Islands and Clyde Coast | Microcom (Glasgow) Limited Nevis Training Centre
|
Ayrshire, Dumfries, Galloway and Inverclyde | Lowland Training Services Limited Microcom (Glasgow) Limited
|
Notes:
1.The pilot is also operating in Bridgend, Leicestershire and Gateshead. There are no private sector providers in these locations.
2.Some providers may not yet have provided services to pilot participants, but may be required to do so during the pilot.
Source:
DWP Provision and Adviser Division; DWP Partnerships Division
Job Centres (Dorset)
Mr. Chope:
To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions if he will ensure that the job centres at (a) Blandford, (b) Bridport, (c) Christchurch, (d) Poole and (e) Wareham are open on a full-time basis to provide services for the public; and if he will make a statement. [212341]
Jane Kennedy
[holding answer 3 March 2005]: The administration of Jobcentre Plus is a matter for the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, David Anderson. He will write to the hon. Member.
Letter from Mr. Jeremy Groombridge to Mr. Christopher Chope, dated 7 March 2005:
The Secretary of State has asked David Anderson, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, to reply to your question about the service provided by the Job Centres at Blandford, Bridport, Christchurch, Poole and Wareham. I am replying on behalf of David Anderson, as one of the Directors of the Jobcentre Plus Board. At present all these offices provide services for the public on a full-time basis.
Jobcentre Plus is continuously reviewing arrangements for service delivery in order to ensure that we provide value for money and take account of the new ways customers access our services. The need for face-to-face facilities for jobsearch and other aspects of our business has been superseded in many instances by new business processes and the use of information technology. For example, over the last 12 months we have seen an increase of over 40 per cent. in the number of hits on our jobsearch website. Encouraging our customers to use these new channels enables us to focus on those customers who need greatest help, through the intervention of personal advisers.
It would be inappropriate to speculate on any future review of delivery sites. However, I can assure you that should local managers determine that changes are required to local service delivery arrangements then local stakeholders would be fully consulted before any changes take place.