| Previous Section | Index | Home Page |
That the Care of Cathedrals (Amendment) Measure, passed by the General Synod of the Church of England, be presented to Her Majesty for Her Royal Assent in the form in which the said Measure was laid before Parliament.
That the Church of England (Miscellaneous Provisions) Measure, passed by the General Synod of the Church of England, be presented to Her Majesty for Her Royal Assent in the form in which the said Measure was laid before Parliament.
That the Stipends (Cessation of Special Payments) Measure, passed by the General Synod of the Church of England, be presented to Her Majesty for Her Royal Assent in the form in which the said Measure was laid before Parliament.— [Sir Stuart Bell.]
Mr. Speaker: I propose to put together the Questions on motions nine to 27.
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 118(6) (Standing Committees on Delegated Legislation),
That the draft Immigration and Asylum (Provision of Accommodation to Failed Asylum-Seekers) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 7th February, be approved.
That the draft Immigration (Leave to Enter and Remain) (Amendment) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 21st February, be approved.
That the draft Community Legal Service (Asylum and Immigration Appeals) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 23rd February, be approved.
That the Revised Funding Code prepared by the Legal Services Commission, a copy of which was laid before this House on 9th March, be approved.
22 Mar 2005 : Column 854
That the draft Child Trust Funds (Appeals) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 9th February, be approved.
That the draft Child Trust Funds (Appeals) (Northern Ireland) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 9th February, be approved.
That the draft Social Security Commissioners (Procedure) (Child Trust Funds) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 9th February, be approved.
That the draft Employment Zones (Allocation to Contractors) Pilot Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 22nd February, be approved.
That the draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Carrying on Regulated Activities by Way of Business) (Amendment) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 10th February, be approved.
That the draft Open-Ended Investment Companies (Amendment) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 10th February, be approved.
That the draft Government Resources and Accounts Act 2000 (Audit of Public Bodies) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 31st January, be approved.
That the draft Special Educational Needs and Disability (Northern Ireland) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 9th February, be approved.
That the draft Criminal Procedure and Investigations Act 1996 (Code of Practice) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 21st February, be approved.
That the draft Non-Domestic Rating (Chargeable Amounts) (England) (Amendment) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 23rd February, be approved.
That the draft Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Communications Data) (Amendment) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 16th December, be approved.
That the draft Regulation of Investigatory Powers (Directed Surveillance and Covert Human Intelligence Sources) (Amendment) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 16th December, be approved.
That the draft Water Fluoridation (Consultation) (England) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 22nd February, be approved.
That the draft Water Supply (Fluoridation Indemnities) (England) Regulations 2005, which were laid before this House on 22nd February, be approved.
22 Mar 2005 : Column 855
That the draft Contracting Out (Functions in Relation to Cultural Objects) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 24th February, be approved.—[Vernon Coaker.]
REGULATORY REFORM
Motion made, and Question put forthwith, pursuant to Standing Order No. 18(1) (Consideration of draft regulatory reform orders),
That the draft Regulatory Reform (National Health Service Charitable and Non-Charitable Trust Accounts and Audit) Order 2005, which was laid before this House on 9th February, be approved.—[Vernon Coaker.]
PETITIONS
Dell Primary School
7.19 pm
Mr. Ben Chapman (Wirral, South) (Lab): I wish to present a petition delivered to me by residents in Wirral, South and Birkenhead. It contains about 1,000 signatures and concerns the possible closure of the Dell primary school, situated in the neighbouring constituency of my right hon. Friend the Member for Birkenhead (Mr. Field). It is a school that many of my constituents' children attend. It is one of the best schools in the district, with growing numbers of pupils, disabled access to more than 90 per cent. of the school premises, a successful nurturing class and excellent investment in facilities, including a state-of-the-art computer suite. My constituents are very concerned about the possible closure of the Dell school.
Declares that the Petitioners are against the Local Education Authority's plan to consider the closure of The Dell Primary School.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to use its influence to persuade Wirral Education Authority to consider most carefully, the views of the said Petitioners.
To lie upon the Table.
22 Mar 2005 : Column 856
Hospital Provision (North Buckinghamshire)
7.20 pm
Mr. John Bercow (Buckingham) (Con): I wish to present a petition on behalf of 1,088 residents of north Buckinghamshire and others. The petitioners are led by Mr. Edward Grimsdale, the secretary of the Buckingham health campaign steering group, and by Councillor Robin Stuchbury, the chairman of the group, by Councillor John Barnett of Buckingham, Dr. Paul Thomas of Gawcott, Buckingham, Councillor Hugh Carey of Turweston, North Buckinghamshire and Petula Boddy of Buckingham. The petition states:
Declares that the Petitioners have serious reservations about the plans for the reorganisation of hospital and other health provisions in North Buckinghamshire, and that the consultation process was inadequate. The Petitioners further declare that the proposed plans are unacceptable.
The Petitioners therefore request that the House of Commons urge the Government to review the proposed plans and make changes to address public concerns.
| Next Section | Index | Home Page |