Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 98-99)

7 DECEMBER 2004

CHRISTINA BLACKLAWS, HILARY LLOYD, KIM BEATSON, CHRISTOPHER GOULDEN AND PHILIP MOOR QC

  Chairman: Good morning and welcome everyone. We have got a splendid team of witnesses and we are very glad to have you with us. We have Philip Moor, from the Family Law Bar Association; Kim Beatson and Christopher Goulden from The Solicitors Family Law Association; and Christina Blacklaws and Hilary Lloyd from The Law Society. You are all very welcome. I think we had just better declare any interests.

Mr Cranston: I am a barrister.

  Keith Vaz: My wife holds a part-time judicial post and I am a non-practising barrister.

  Chairman: Please do not feel obliged to answer every question. Between you I think we can have a very good source of ideas and comments. On the other hand, if something is said which you feel does not reflect your own standpoint by all means feel free to indicate that you want to contribute on that point as well. Mr Soley?

  Q98 Mr Soley: I would like to know about the feeling of dissatisfaction by parents with family courts generally. We are told that there is quite a high level of dissatisfaction. First of all, do you think that is correct? Secondly, what do you think the cause of it is? Bearing in mind the Chairman's comments that you do not all have to answer, but in a way it crosses all your expertise, so who wants to start?

  Christopher Goulden: If I could comment first. I feel sure that most people would agree that what parents particularly object to about the family justice system is the length of time it takes to get anything done, and there are a number of reasons for that, but delay is a great source of dissatisfaction.

  Q99 Mr Soley: Okay, that is delay. What about process?

  Christopher Goulden: The process itself to an extent they would have objections to because they find it an uncomfortable process but, ultimately, they have an idea of what they want and they have an idea of when they want it and so long as those two are met I do not suppose they would actually object to the actual process itself.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 2 March 2005