Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Joint First Report


APPENDIX TWO: NOTE BY CLIVE BETTS MP OF INTERVIEW WITH SHEFFIELD ELECTORAL REGISTRATION OFFICER, EIRWEN EVES

1. Barely 80% of households have returned forms for the register which has come into operation this month. Follow up reminder letters were sent after the first one and additionally letters have been sent to all properties where no-one is registered. One thousand forms have been returned on that basis alone. The Registration Officer's view is there has been a cultural change and people don't think they have to send the form back. Indeed many people assume that once they are on the register they remain on it even if they don't bother to respond.

2. This highlights different practice in different authorities as apparently in some parts of the country local authorities do leave people on the register until they have evidence that they have actually moved. In Sheffield, however, if a household doesn't return a form for two years then they are taken off. I think this highlights perhaps the need for some clear code of practice at national level so that we get a consistent approach to registration.

3. Apparently there already is the facility to cross-check against council tax information and that is now accepted practice. As part of the cross-checking apparently there were 10,000 found on the register who weren't down as being on the council tax list. The registration officer doesn't automatically put people on the list if they are on the council tax list and merely writes to households where there has been a name change but a registration form hasn't been returned.

4. On individual registration the registration officer thought that this could reduce registration by between 30-50%. I am not sure there is any scientific basis for that but she says there is a lot of unease amongst her colleagues that if nothing else is done the register will be significantly less accurate. She estimates the register is about 90% accurate of those currently registered.

5. In terms of the current registration process she highlighted something I didn't realise which is that while there is rolling registration most of the year, from August to December there isn't, because the new registration is being done. People can't just come in and add their names to the register as they can at any other time of year. This she says causes a lot of confusion amongst the public and sometimes leads to people getting quite upset that they can't, as everyone believes, just come in and register at any time. She accepted that if we had a situation where people remained permanently on the register then there could be a periodic audit alongside information coming from different sources about people moving house. She pointed out that that actually could be a lot more efficient because currently what in effect is the annual process of registration is all attempted in a two or three month period whereas if they had a static register updated for removals, audit could be done at different times of the year, spread across the year, enabling them to concentrate in detail on particular areas and be far more effective.

6. She was in favour of using other sources of information about removals including Inland Revenue, National Insurance, citizenship ceremonies where people change their nationality and therefore become eligible to vote, and then eventually ID cards as well.

7. Sheffield now uses a facility for people to confirm registration by telephone where there haven't been any changes in the household. She said that 30,000 households had done that this year. That is 20% of the people registering.

8. With regard to postal votes she confirmed that quite a few people who ticked a box applying for a postal vote application form never returned them. Though she had some reservations about it because she thought people would do it too simplistically without necessarily understanding, this might confirm the need for simply ticking a box on a registration form to decide to vote by post rather than applying for a form. Interestingly she said that when the poll card goes out for the general election people will be able to apply for a postal vote — there will actually be a postal vote application on the poll card which people will be able to send back. They won't have a lot of time to do it but it did seem to me quite a new innovation which was probably worthy of support.

9. I know in the past that Westminster Council have sent out a poll card when the new register is published to confirm who is actually on the register at each house. I think they probably get a large number of people complaining that the card has come to someone completely different from the people who live there. I understand that Rotherham Council are also going to do that on this occasion and it might be interesting to monitor precisely what impact that particular procedure has.

10. In terms of being able to vote immediately prior to the election, she was quite relaxed about that as she said that with everything on the computer these days it is relatively easy to register people. As things stand people will have to register by 11 March for a 5 May election. That is going to leave a lot of people very disappointed.

I am sending to you under separate cover copies of the forms returned by ward and constituency. It is very interesting to look at the variation between the Dore & Totley ward, which has the only conservative councillors in Sheffield and has a Forms Returned rate of 89.8%, compared to Burngreave ward (56.84%) which has a large number of private rented houses, or Manor Castle Ward which has had less than two-thirds of forms returned. Both Burngreave and Manor Castle wards are amongst the poorest wards in the city, whereas Dore & Totley ward is amongst the more affluent. In political terms you can almost guarantee, with the exception of Central which has some peculiarities, the percentage of the Labour vote being inverse to the percentage of forms returned.

I hope these notes are helpful on one or two of the practical issues which currently exist on the ground.

Clive Betts
MP for Sheffield Attercliffe
February 2005


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 24 March 2005