Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum by Sergio A S Pettezzoni, Perseu Software (VOT 09)

  My name is Sergio A S Pettezzoni, from Perseu Software, a Brazilian software house, web-based e-Voting software developer. I write with the purpose of contributing to the Parliamentary Inquiry into the practicalities of electronic voting.

GENERAL CONCEPTS

  1.  As this subject involves national security, my opinion is that all the electoral process must be conducted, administered and controlled by the State.

  2.  The world is still at a very early stage in the work on e-Democracy. As everything is new, everything must be known.

  3.  I agree with Professor Aviel Rubin, computer science teacher at Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, USA, when he says that "the government should become more involved not only in setting the standards but also in testing the technology, a process now done by testing companies, paid by manufacturers, to certify the accuracy of the makers' equipment".

  4.  The public administration should constitute and guide a co-operative, collaborative and complementary environment; not a tendering competition; forming a collective of ideas, stimulating debates, the presentation of projects and the promotion of partnerships.

  5.   A governmental department should know, test, valuate and classify all products offered by the suppliers, in order to counsel the Local Authorities, giving them complete and specialised orientation. Its analysis would be also helpful to drive the formation of consortia, ensuring complementarity.

  6.  The opportunity to experiment in the various localities should be offered to all projects; giving everybody the same chance of being evaluated.

  7.  Solutions that had not been piloted or not yet been tested fully must be observed too.

THE ELECTRONIC VOTING VIA THE INTERNET

  1.  The current encryption technology can ensure the safe data transmission through the Internet.

  2.  The firewalls and security software, at present accessible for all, can protect not only the Government's equipment, but also the citizens'.

  3.  Every year databases get more powerful and the servers better and more capable of executing millions of operations per second.

  4.  All electronic voting systems (Internet, Electronic Kiosk, Digital Television, Telephone, Mobile Text Messaging, etc), without exception, can be programmed to record the electors' steps when voting, breaking the right to privacy; and tainting the results.

  The doubt is: Is the software clean or corrupted?

  5.  The authorities must have access to the codes, before, during and after the election, to verify the correctness and integrity of the commands.

  The best option is to install just one piece of software. Having only one system attending the entire nation, integrating the country, regions and localities, means that it will be easy to check. An audit could examine the results of this single programmation.

  Using the example of electronic kiosks, it is very difficult to control several programmes installed in several machines. If a sample of them were altered and escaped inspection, it would modify the final results and expose the votes. There are many opportunities for changes to be made: in the fabrication, during the transport and in the storage.

  6.  The expenditure is reduced, with just one web-based e-Voting software. The cost for the people who have web connection at home will be also diminished, since the cost of travelling to the poll stations will be saved. For those who do not have home computers, the public computers in the town hall, libraries, schools, post offices, etc., or even the computers in the cybercafes will solve the problem.

  The electronic kiosk is expensive and the required quantity, transportation, infrastructure, installation and the necessary staff required, multiply the cost.

  7.  Internet voting helps to increase the turnout. As the elector can vote at home (even at lengthy distances, by radio or satellite connections), he can choose the best time to do it, at a time that will not disturb the rest of his day. When travelling, the voter can use any cybercafe.

  The last American election showed queues of electors waiting in the electronic kiosks. Voting this way obliges the people who live in distant places to commute. Being out of the country, it is only possible to vote at the diplomatic representations or by mail.

  8.  The Internet Hyper Text permits furnishing complete information to voters about candidates, parties and proposals through links to the corresponding websites, bettering the quality of the vote. Moreover, it can display the candidates' photos and the parties' logos.

  The only data offered by the electronic kiosks are the candidates' photos; and the numbers attributed to the candidates and parties are a factor of complication for the electors.

  9.  The Internet systems can translate the texts for the citizen: questionnaires, instructions, register,

e-mails, confirmations of voting (which can be printed), etc, no matter what idiom he talks.

  10.  The entrance on the system is possible by any kind of key: login, password, secret question, Personal Identification Number—PIN, Personal Identification Device—PID, national identity card, fingerprint, iris scan, face scan, hand geometry, etc.

  11.  In a web-based system, the registration can be made on-line, in a decentralised manner by various officials, anywhere, even at the consulates.

  Another favourable aspect of the single software is the building of the National Electoral Register. This allows the citizen to answer the consultations of his locality, of his region and of the Kingdom, using the same system.

  The National Electoral Register can also be used by other applications of e-Government like:

    e-Health;

    e-Learning;

    e-Petitioning;

    e-Income Statement;

    e-Payment;

    e-Housing Register;

    e-Police Nationwide Biometric Identification;

    e-Historical Criminal Records; and etc.

  All these systems can have their own isolated citizens' registries, but the ideal is to have only one, covering the entire country and serving various tasks. Besides having several facilities, to protect virtually and physically just one public registry is easier than protecting many.

  12.  The main application of a web-based electoral system is the use of the Customer Relationship Management (CRM), philosophy that permits the interaction of the citizen with the government:

e-Participation.

  With this tool, it is possible to develop social politics, in order to satisfy the population, optimise the public service and increase the confidence of the people in the administration.

  The CRM allows for the development of semi-direct Democracy, gives voice to the minority groups and identifies localised problems and needs, enabling localised decisions.

THE PROCUREMENT PROCESS

  Perseu Software has been trying to introduce its e-Voting solution to the British administration since 2002. The only organisation that knew the software adequately was the Electoral Commission, which invited the firm to participate in the United Kingdom e-Voting experiments of 2003.

  Since then, no official bureau has given regard to it; despite the fact that we had expressed an interest to become technology providers for the Electoral Modernisation Pilots Project in October 2002 and registered the firm in 2003 as supplier in the National Project Suppliers Register and in the United Kingdom CRM National Programme.

CONCLUSIONS

  1.  A project of such magnitude and complexity cannot be conducted just by an individual company.

  2.  The Government must have a knowledge of all of the solutions and select the most valuable from those offered by the suppliers in the different areas, like software; database; security and protection (including physical defence); servers and hosting; communications; etc., in order to compose a cooperative and complementary environment, getting the best of all available works.

  3.  The Internet is recognised today as a potential tool of social inclusion.

  4.  The web-based electronic voting is the most viable option, because of the current security, facilities and low cost.

  5.  One single piece of software covering the entire nation is the best way to fiscalise the system and to reduce the expenses.

  6.  The suppliers are participators in the structure that will generate the desirable solutions and they need the government's support and help to achieve these goals.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 25 January 2005