Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Memorandum by Mencap (VOT 20)

  Thank you for giving Mencap the opportunity to respond to your inquiry into voter registration. Mencap is the UK's leading organisation representing people with a learning disability, their families and carers, and as such we are pleased to contribute towards this important inquiry.

GENERAL COMMENTS

  The majority of people with a learning disability have the capacity to understand what voting is about and should be included on the electoral register. It is therefore imperative that any new process adopted to enable people to register to vote is simple, straightforward and easy for people to interpret. In the case of registering people with a learning disability, it is also very important that the role of a supporter or "attestor" is clearly established and does not discourage registration or deny people the right to vote.

(a)   Advantages of individual registration compared with the existing system of household registration

  1.  Northern Ireland has already adopted an individual registration process. However, Mencap has noted with concern the findings of the Electoral Commission in their report, The Electoral Fraud (Northern Ireland) Act 2002: An assessment of its first year in operation, that:

    "The process of individual registration may inadvertently have impacted on people with learning disabilities, thus effectively disenfranchising hundreds of people who in the past may have voted".

  2.  This demonstrates that while there are clear benefits to an individual registration process including giving the public greater confidence in the electoral process, any moves towards an individual registration process must carefully address the potential difficulties that may arise as a result.

  3.  First, some people with a learning disability will be unable to understand or complete complex voter registration forms. It must be a priority that any registration form produced should be available in a fully accessible format, with supporting guidance, to enable people with a learning disability to complete their own forms if possible.

  4.  In Northern Ireland, if a person is unable to complete their own form because of their learning disability, an "attestor" may do so on their behalf. The "attestor" is then sent a letter which (s)he must sign to prove the person's ability to vote.

  5.  However, this can mean that too much onus may be put on the attestor (usually a parent/carer) to make a judgement about the capacity of the person with a learning disability to vote, which could be a particular problem if the attestor is not sure of electoral law.

  6.  Therefore it is vital that if such an approach was adopted in England, the following points should be taken into account:

    6.1  Parents and carers who will act as attestors must be given clear information, support and guidance so that they are confident in their role and the right of people with a learning disability to vote.

    6.2  Residential care home managers should also be made aware of how the process would work for their residents.

(b)   Strategies for encouraging registration, in particular among young voters, and tackling resistance to registration; and examination of the advantages and disadvantages of compulsory registration

  7.  People with a learning disability, their parents and carers often do not know their rights around registering to vote. There are a number of ways in which people with a learning disability should be encouraged to register to vote:

    7.1  All forms and information, such as leaflets on how to vote, registration forms and websites must be produced in a fully accessible format. Mencap are disappointed that there is currently little accessible information available from the Electoral Commission in this area.

    7.2  There needs to be a specific promotional campaign targeted at people with a learning disability, their families, carers and residential care managers, highlighting the right to vote of people with a learning disability and the process of registering.

    7.3  A wider issue surrounds the general public's perception that people with a learning disability do not have the right to vote. This must be challenged.

    7.4  The Electoral Commission Outreach programme currently raises young people's awareness of democratic processes in the UK. An expanded programme encouraging other groups, including people with a learning disability, to register to vote would be of clear value.

(c)   Advantages or disadvantages of electronic rather than paper based registration systems

  8.  It would be advantageous for both paper based and electronic registration systems to be available in order to maximise everyone's options. However, for people with a learning disability, it is of vital importance that both technology and paper based registration systems are produced in accessible formats.

  9.  Any safeguards that are introduced to prevent fraud in electronic registration will need to ensure that they do not act as a barrier to people with a learning disability. For example, people with a learning disability sometimes find it difficult to remember a PIN number and would therefore need to be assisted. However, they would also need support to ensure that their voter identity is protected.

(d)   Difficulties for the disabled and others unable to complete forms

  10.  We have referred to the possible difficulties people with a learning disability face when completing forms in paragraph 3. As always we would stress the importance of accessible forms alongside supporting and accessible guidance.

David Congdon

Head of External Relations


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 25 January 2005