Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Written Evidence


Supplementary evidence submitted by Professor I R Scott

  I am sorry I did not manage to say much today about the second of the four topics I alluded to, ie staffing (the other three were budget process (on which we spent a lot of time), accommodation (which we touched on very briefly) and case processing (of which we said nothing)).

  I am worried that I did not convey clearly to your Committee the general distinction between court officers, appointed under statute and serving the court, and other court staff who, under executive-based court administration systems, are civil servants and find themselves in the position of having to serve two masters.

  I would be pleased if you would explain to your chairman that one of the reasons why I am disturbed about the bill making no provision for the appointment of a court officer (perhaps in the form of a registrar) or officers for the proposed Supreme Court, is that I believe that one of the most important court administration functions is records management. If the judges, through their registrar (or what ever their officer is called), are not wholly responsible for and in charge of the court's own records, that is a serious weakness in the court's structure. I would go so far as to say that the suggestion that a department of the executive branch should be in charge of the records of the proposed new Supreme Court (which is what the bill proposes) is intolerable.

  The new court will need a person to play the role presently played for the House of Lords in its judicial capacity heretofore played by the Judicial Clerk.

  In some judiciary-based court administration systems, the court registrar is appointed by the court or by the court in conjunction with the executive and is often given some security of tenure. In executive-based systems, they may be appointed by the executive but they are not civil servants.

Professor I R Scott

24 May 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 January 2005