Select Committee on Constitutional Affairs Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 240-246)

RT HON LORD FALCONER OF THOROTON QC AND SIR HAYDEN PHILLIPS GCB

8 JUNE 2004

  Q240 Chairman: Do you now have a policy on that or is that still being evolved?

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: We have a policy that there should be full cost recovery across the civil litigation system of the costs of the Supreme Court insofar as they relate to civil cases. That is the policy. How that is to be done between the Supreme Court fees and the wider fees has not yet been resolved, but I have got no plans to increase the level of fees for the Supreme Court, so it would have to be done primarily by increasing the civil litigation fees.

  Q241 Mr Soley: Are you actually saying that you are going to try and do a comparison of the costs for the new Supreme Court with what the costs are now?

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: Yes.

  Q242 Mr Soley: How on earth are you going to strip out House of Lords' costs as they are now?

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: We do the best that we can in relation to it, but that, as I understand it, is what the Chairman and Mr Bottomley have asked for and that is what we will try and do in relation to that.

  Q243 Mr Soley: Try and do it, so be it, but I have to say that it has to be a terribly arbitrary exercise given the nature of the costs of the House of Lords.

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: Yes, I agree with that.

  Sir Hayden Phillips: We have done quite a lot of work with the Judicial Office and with the House of Lords' authorities and we will obviously let you see the results of that work and you will see the assumptions we have had to make in order to make the calculation we need to do.

  Q244 Mr Soley: You add up the costs of the House of Lords and divide it by 1,000, or whatever number of Lords it is. Is that roughly right?

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: The point does not arise at the moment for the reason we started with, that we are not trying to recover the costs of the final Court of Appeal of the House of Lords at the moment because we are not paying them.

  Q245 Chairman: In asking that question, I think we were conscious that a fair amount of this information is available, is in the system and is material which you have had to use in order to begin to make estimates for what the new Supreme Court would cost.

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: Yes.

  Q246 Chairman: Thank you very much, Lord Chancellor and Sir Hayden. We expect to see you again on this issue several times, I suspect, and on others as the show goes on. Sir Hayden, we will see you back once more before your impending retirement and we look forward to that.

  Lord Falconer of Thoroton: This is his penultimate appearance before you.

  Chairman: Thank you.





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 28 January 2005