Annex B
ANTI-TERRORISM,
CRIME & SECURITY
ACT 2001—DETAINEES
UNDER PART
4
A table setting out the number of people who
have been certified and detained under the Act and providing an
update on their current position can be found on http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/docs3/atcsa—detainees.html
DEPORTATION SINCE
1997
| Case |
| Date certificate received | Decision
|
| 1 | |
| Deport upheld but not removed |
| 2 | |
| Deport upheld lost on Art 3 |
| 3 | |
| Deport upheld lost on Art 3 |
| 4 | | 28/10/02
| Abandoned |
| 5 | | 06/02/03
| Withdrawn by S of S released from court |
| 6 | | 05/12/02
| 18/02/05 upheld |
| 7 | | 10/06/03
| Withdrawn |
| 8 | | 18/08/03
| Withdrawn |
| 9 | | 13/12/04
| Pending |
| 10 | | 16/02/01
| Exclusion—lifted by S of S |
| 11 | O | 27/12/02
| Withdrawn by the S of S |
| | |
|
The names of the cases have been removed because it is Home
Office policy to maintain confidentiality in immigration cases,
for reasons of personal privacy and data protection.
11 appeals received;
1 S of S decision not to revoke a DO upheld
1 pending
2 withdrawn by appellants
2 decisions to deport withdrawn by S of S
1 appeal abandoned
2 deportations upheld but lost on Article 3
1 deportation upheld but not removed
1 appeal against exclusion (exclusion lifted by S of S)
Of the 11 above, 1 is currently detained under the Immigration
Act 1971 pending removal.
No persons have so far been deported as a result of decisions
which have been appealed to SIAC. Although the Home Office has
been successful in three appeals against deportation, two of the
appellants have not been removed because SIAC found that removal
would contravene the ECHR, specifically Article 3. The other appellant
was not removed because he was no longer regarded as a threat
to national security at the conclusion of the appeal. This was
the first appeal to SIAC and was tested as far as the House of
Lords.
These three cases are the only deportation appeals to have
been fully heard by SIAC. We continue to take action against those
who represent a threat to national security and make every effort
to secure deportations. SAIC has recently upheld the decision
of the Secretary of State to refuse to revoke a deportation order.
DEPRIVATION OF
CITIZENSHIP
1 appeal received
Case 1, 17/04/03 appeal received, Adjourned at appellant's
request
Detained: initially under extradition powers, currently
held in custody pending trial on criminal charges in the UK.
| 
