Annex
E-mail from Ian Tabbron, Arts Council England
to James Chalmers, dated 24 November 2003
Points from the assessment of this project:
The bid was not failed overall but did not score
as highly as other applications in a very oversubscribed process.
The project was clearly described and based
on an interesting and ambitious proposal.
The open audition process and time limited nature
of the work was an issue as ACE is looking to prioritise sustainable
and inclusive opportunities for young people as part of ongoing
programmes. Raising expectation of young people has to be seen
against the likelihood of them having further chances to use and
develop skills and interests. While competition is not unhealthy,
public investment in participatory work requires the offering
of opportunities for young people with a wide range of skills
and potentials.
Given the above and the nature of the project
the lack of substantial partnership with appropriate groups or
organisations (youth arts groups, schools, youth services etc)
was a real concern.
The budget showed heavy dependency upon earned
income and Grants for the Arts award being made. Some other applications
show more robust spread of income from other sources including
some cash already confirmed.
Artistic team were also the administration and
financial team. In some projects there are specialists taking
on these responsibilities.
The marketing and evaluation plans while not
inadequate were not very detailed and lacked appropriate budgets
for implementation.
I hope this is helpful James and gives and adequately
demonstrates why you did not score highly enough to secure an
award.
27 November 2003
| 
