Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 180-183)

SOLT, TMA

1 FEBRUARY 2005

  Q180 Ms Shipley: —Inreach and a total theatre experience; two things.

  Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen: —When in many, many cases those buildings not just the Comedy but to go round the theatres the Shaftesbury, all four theatres on Shaftesbury Avenue, the St Martin's, the Savoy, the Garrick. You simply do not have the physical space in which you could do any of those things.

  Q181 Ms Shipley: So no chance of innovation in all these named theatres?

  Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen: In those theatres that I have named I can think of no way of providing the total theatre experience that the National Theatre does very well.

  Q182 Ms Shipley: And the regional theatres by the sound of it.

  Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen: And some regional theatres which receive significant subsidy for that purpose.

  Chairman: I do not believe you have got the tiniest social obligation of any kind. You are commercial enterprises which own theatres in order to make money out of putting on entertainment to which people go and I think that is a perfectly reputable thing to do and your latest statistics show that you are meeting a public demand. Furthermore, at the risk of a public differing with Chris Bryant, I believe, without myself passing a judgment (which I have got no need or right to do) on your application for Lottery funds it is in essence an ideal form of application since there is no chance whatever of the Treasury ever giving you this money and, that being so, it is a very good example of the additionality principle which the Treasury is ditching the whole time but on this occasion is actually observing. Nor, with reference to Mr Fabricant, do I believe that you do not have a right to Lottery money because you are in London and somebody buying a ticket in Wigan is not in London because after all the Eden Project is in the South of Cornwall and the Lowry Theatre is in Salford and even somebody in Wigan may not wish to go to Salford, let alone to the South of Cornwall. Having placed all that on the record—

  Chris Bryant: Let alone going to Wigan—

  Q183 Chairman: Actually I am very fond of Wigan. If you go to Wigan you get this George Orwell thing, the Wigan Pier Experience. I recommend that you go and have a look at it. It was also Lottery funded. With regard to the application, could I ask you, first of all, are you going to make the bid to the Heritage Lottery Fund on the ground that they are historic buildings, and some of them no doubt are listed, or are you going to do it to the Arts Council or are you going to do what my friend Felicity Goody did with the Salford and apply to every Lottery distributor in sight in the hope of winning on some of them? Secondly, would you be able to provide the matching funds?

  Sir Stephen Waley-Cohen: We are not applying to everyone in sight that we can think of. We are talking to the Heritage Lottery Fund and the Arts Council and the London Development Agency. We are having those conversations through the medium of a working group which includes the Theatres Trust who you saw last week, the Society of London Theatres and the DCMS themselves, so this is a discussion process rather than a bid out of the cold, in which we are talking to them about how they think together we might find a way of making this possible if they agree that it should be made possible. So we are talking to them about it because the Arts Council has proper objectives in this, and we believe, for the reasons you described, the Heritage Lottery Fund has proper objectives in this and because of the economic benefits to London the LDA has proper reason to be looking at this. The matching funds? Yes, we think we can find the matching funds. We have had a large number of internal industry meetings and discussions about it and we believe that with what is already being spent, what will be spent and a couple of ways of finding some additional money, that we can find it. While we talk of £125 million from each side making up £250 million at 2003 prices, we are talking about a 15-year plus project which does mean we are talking about, I round numbers, £15 million a year, which comes down to, if all three public sources contributed equally, £2.5 million a year from each of them and £7.5 million a year from the industry. When you break it down into the smaller sums in this way it all seems more possible than it does when you think of £250 million.

  Mr Pulford: For the record, just to confirm that all but five of the commercially operated theatres in the West End are listed buildings.

  Chairman: Gentlemen, thank you very much indeed.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 30 March 2005