Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Birmingham City Council

BACKGROUND

  Birmingham City Council operates three grant funding schemes for the arts: Grants to Major Arts Organisations; Small Scale Revenue and Project Grants; and Arts in Education Grants. The former scheme (£5.1 million) aims to provide consistent funding to the 11 most strategically important arts organisations in the city. The smaller scale scheme (£150,000) supports nine small scale companies and around 40 projects each year. The Arts in Education scheme (£250,000) supports work by the City's arts organisations in schools. Birmingham Repertory Theatre received a core grant of £991,165, and an arts in education award of £14,600 in 2004-05. Other theatre organisations receiving funding include: Midlands Arts Centre (mac); SAMPAD; The Drum; Big Brum; Birmingham Stage Company; Women and Theatre; and Language Alive. The City Council also supported the capital development of the Hippodrome Theatre. Behind the scenes the City Council works with theatre organisations through: advice and guidance on European funding streams; technical support on Lottery applications; and support of festivals and conferences such as the "Informal European Theatre Meeting" (IETM) in 2003.

THE PERFORMANCE OF ARTS COUNCIL ENGLAND IN DEVELOPING STRATEGIES AND PRIORITIES AND DISBURSING FUNDS ACCORDINGLY

  The City Council works in partnership with Arts Council England concerning the shared portfolio of arts organisations, including the Birmingham Repertory Theatre. The partnership approach is largely informal and consultative, but has proven effective in considering priorities for investment in the arts. In the absence of a national capital strategy for the arts this partnership approach has been helpful in focusing efforts where they are needed. Birmingham City Council and Arts Council England are currently working closely together towards assembling a scheme and funding for the redevelopment of Midlands Arts Centre (mac).

  Theatre practitioners first and foremost require consistency and stability in their funding relationships. Theatre is a high risk activity where even the most successful theatre can suffer setbacks at the box office, and funding regimes should aim to secure theatres finances at a level that an individual show failing to achieve target does not risk the failure of the organisation. Strategies and priorities for the disbursement of funds should give primacy to the core revenue funding partnerships that sustain most subsidised theatre in England.

SUPPORT FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND DEVELOPMENT OF: THEATRE BUILDINGS; NEW WRITING; NEW PERFORMING TALENT

  The challenging artistic policy of the Rep and other companies in the city means that work has relevance for almost all age groups and communities in Birmingham. The controversy surrounding Sikh demonstrations at the theatre masked genuine achievements in creating theatre that speaks across the city, supported by outreach and education activity to engage with all sections of society. The Rep has consciously sought to develop local talent and new writing and the City Council supports these efforts. Birmingham is a vibrant multi cultural city that aspires to also be a vibrant inter cultural centre. This aim means that organisations such as the Rep must reach out and engage with the variety of cultures that make up Birmingham today.

THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THE THEATRE AS A GENRE (A) WITHIN THE CULTURAL LIFE OF THE UK; (B) IN THE REGIONS SPECIFICALLY AND (C) WITHIN THE UK ECONOMY, DIRECTLY AND INDIRECTLY

  In the case of Birmingham Rep extra investment has translated into better activity and audience figures. The artistic and economic health of the Rep has also resulted in innovation on both stages, and in the community and education activities of the theatre. Of equal importance has been the revival of the Rep's local reputation with audiences and with decision makers in the city. The Rep, along with other major arts organisations in Birmingham, makes a major contribution to the overall cultural life of the city. The company works into community and education through Birmingham's ArtSites and Anim8 Local Arts networks, and provides professionals to work in training and apprenticeship schemes such as Gallery 37 and Flying Start. The Rep provides facilities and artists for ArtsFest, England's largest free arts festival, and has developed three major components of the city's Urban Culture Programme in 2005-06 (Urban Fusion).

  The 2003 Annual Arts Survey in Birmingham measures the activity and impact of the arts in the city. This was the fourth survey and was based on over one hundred responses and excludes commercial and specialist arts activity. There were over 6,500 performances attracting over 1.5 million audience, and over 500,000 attendances at participative activities. Over 1,200 jobs were directly created by this activity and £1.7 million was spent on 3,000 freelance artists. Collective turnover was over £57 million. Birmingham organisations also gave 300 performances and 1,600 other events and workshops outside the city. Touring work was seen by 300,000 people.

THE EFFECTIVENESS OF PUBLIC SUBSIDY FOR THEATRE AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE SUBSIDISED SECTOR AND THE COMMERCIAL SECTOR—ESPECIALLY LONDON'S WEST END

  A large proportion of the public funds invested in the arts come from Local Government. The Government should acknowledge and support the value of this support in the criteria by which a Local Authority is assessed. Similarly a set of positive outcomes should be identified by which the performance of an individual theatre can be judged by both Local Government and DCMS. Not enough is known about the economic benefits arising from theatre activity. The Local Government Association, DCMS, and Arts Council England could usefully work together to devise a framework by which the effect of theatre and arts activity on both the economy and quality of life, and the outcomes associated with engagement with theatre and the arts, are judged.

  Public funds such as Heritage Lottery funding are used to help preserve the built heritage of historic venues. Such schemes could operate in the form of a challenge fund for the commercial sector, to create incentives for investment.

February 2005





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 30 March 2005