Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 30-39)

2 FEBRUARY 2004

MS CAROLE SOUTER, CAPTAIN RICHARD WOODMAN, COMMANDER JOHN PATON AND MR TIM PARR

  Q30 Chairman: Good morning. I suspect you have heard some of the criticism, does anyone want to come back on anything that you have heard from the first witnesses?

  Captain Woodman: If I may, Chairman. I represent the National Historic Ships Committee as its Chairman. I would like to pick up and really endorse a couple of points made earlier. We take an overview, we are not partisan of any particular cause. We would agree that the maritime sector is hugely neglected and needs a high profile before we lose a great deal of it. In a sense, in 2005 we have a feeling it is the last chance saloon. Ships matter because they have made this country what it is, and I am not just talking about warships, I am talking about merchant vessels and service vessels. We feel that it is extremely important that this matter is raised before you. The National Historic Ships Committee has come in for a certain amount of opprobrium from some quarters. I would like to correct one impression made by Rear Admiral Hervey who said that the core collection had been selected by Dr Prescott. Dr Prescott was commissioned to devise the method by which we selected a core collection. It is done on the basis that we look for a number of vessels which reflect the whole spectrum of maritime achievement in this country, so we are looking at selected examples of ship types, connections with famous people, famous events and also the vernacular and the mundane where it is significant. We have taken a very broad look at this. This does not fall in with everybody's expectations. We know perfectly well that you cannot list ships, and we would advise strongly against it, in the same way as buildings because they are vastly different, not only are they different in their method of construction but they are different in their purpose. We have historic ships which are at sea operating and, therefore, conform with things like SOLAS 95 and all the regulations that govern vessels and have to sacrifice bits of their original material to keep going on that basis. We have also got vessels which are static in museums in glass cases and we have them, like Victory, Cutty Sark and Discovery, which are out in the open air. The horrors of regulation by listing seem to be quite awful and we do not really want to contemplate that. The core collection which amounts to 58 vessels was based on the premises that I have just outlined and it is important to say that the National Historic Ships Committee in arriving at this figure were mindful constantly that the resources were going to be limited and that it was not a bottomless pit and we would have to work on the basis that we were driven by practicality. The list of designated vessels, which you are aware of, amounts at the present time to 157. There is some provision in there for transfer of vessels should some of the core collection be lost for one reason or another, deterioration or mismanagement or whatever. There are some good reserve list within that, as it were.

  Q31 Chairman: I am just aware you are getting into a long statement and we want to ask you lots of questions.

  Captain Woodman: I am sorry. Perhaps I will let it rest there.

  Q32 Chairman: Does anyone else want to pick up anything that was said earlier?

  Commander Paton: Could I just say that historic ships are not just important because of the past, they are important for the future as well. They are wonderful vehicles for education, inclusivity, regeneration and all those sorts of things. Yes, they are memorials to the past but they are also very, very important vehicles for the future.

  Mr Parr: I would like to say that historic ships in some people's opinion are almost bottomless pits and the money goes off anywhere. In fact, there are numbers of people who have benefited from them on particular ships like the Waverley which has been carrying 150,000 passengers per year for the last three years ever since she has been refitted, Balmoral similarly, the steam tug Challenge, in the last year since she has been refitted has had over 16,000 visitors through the ship. She has done over 2,000 miles in the last year and has been to Dordrecht, Liverpool, Brest, D-Day and two boat shows. I think that is extremely good value for money. People do not realise what value for money we have had in historic ships from grants from HLF.

  Q33 Chairman: On the 58 you have got, have you done a costing as to how much you need just to keep them in good nick?

  Captain Woodman: No, we have not.

  Q34 Chairman: So you have no idea really. Will you do it or not?

  Commander Paton: That is very much a plan that we want to do as soon as possible.

  Q35 Chairman: You have the resource for that?

  Commander Paton: We will not until we have got the Unit.

  Q36 Chairman: Coming later, I am told.

  Commander Paton: It will be a very careful analysis. We also needed a greater status to be able to go to the 58 and say we would really like this business information so that we can present a full case.

  Q37 Mr Hawkins: I really wanted to follow upon that. One of the things that we are interested in is the way the system as it has operated up until now may change once this new National Historic Ships Unit is established. Particularly for your committee, how do you foresee now your role is going to change? What is the interlinking going to be between you and the new Unit, or is that yet to be determined?

  Captain Woodman: It is yet to be determined. I would very happily hang my hat up if I was a volunteer and go and tend the garden if I knew it was going to be properly looked after and the stewardship would be adequately done. Certainly we have a lot of things we would like the Unit to do and I imagine probably a percentage of that is going to be a wish list at the moment. We were very interested in what you said this morning.

  Q38 Chairman: Is there a university anywhere that concentrates on this area? Is there a professor or anyone who looks at historical ships? Do we have any research anywhere in our universities?

  Commander Paton: It was Dr Robert Prescott from St Andrews who led the original project. I think his department is in the process of closing down, through lack of funds I suspect.

  Captain Woodman: There is an International Maritime Unit at Cardiff but that is more in terms of studying current shipping.

  Q39 Chairman: We are asking almost out of ignorance here. Would it be helpful if there was one university that had this as part of its being?

  Commander Paton: Yes, very much so.

  Chairman: Chatham has Greenwich, and I am not saying that because it is close to me, there are a lot of places, I am just asking.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 18 March 2005