Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by the Contemporary Art Society (CAS)

BACKGROUND

    —  CAS is a charity that buys works of art by living artists for its member museums and has done so since 1910.

    —  CAS' individual members are largely collectors of contemporary art.

    —  CAS earns income through advising companies on how to purchase or commission works of art from artists or their dealers.

    —  CAS also earns income, and supports artists, through an annual art market, ARTfutures, at which works of art are for sale on behalf of artists.

    —  CAS has run a £3.5 million Special Collections Scheme in England (with £2.5 million from the Lottery through ACE and matching funds from museums) which made substantial purchases for public collections; a similar scheme, the National Collecting Scheme for Scotland currently operates with Lottery funds from the Scottish Arts Council; no funds have been forthcoming, yet, for the continuation of the English scheme to the detriment of artists, museum audiences and dealers in Britain.

    —  CAS has recently set up two membership groups for young collectors: blood in London and Spin, in partnership with the National Galleries of Scotland and, soon, a second branch with a public partner in Glasgow.

VIEWS

    —  There is a large potential collector base in Britain as both recent ACE research (Market Matters/Taste Buds) and the success of Frieze Art Fair/Zoo indicate.

    —  Without a substantial national market, dealers seek to sell outside Britain through carefully managed museum and auction sales; exponentially, museums can never catch up with increased prices.

    —  Without active public collections, private individuals are not given the confidence to begin collections or develop relations with museums as potential donors; the situation is bad in London and severe in the regions and in Scotland.

    —  Implementing droit-de-suite is less important than changing the laws governing tax relief on gifts of art to museums during the donor's lifetime; the income and recognition that accrue from museum acquisitions is more valuable.

RECOMMENDATIONS

    —  Re-establish adequate purchase funds for museums, both national and regional, preferably through the creation of endowments.

    —  Change the tax system to encourage more major purchases to be made in Britain by British tax payers, if works could be subsequently given to museums, and not just national museums, in lieu of tax during the donor's lifetime.

    —  Re-establish funding for CAS Special Collections Scheme and widen it to the waiting list of museums so that carefully designed collections and commissions of contemporary art and craft can support artists, develop regional audiences and extend the number of active supporters and collectors of contemporary art in areas beyond London.

    —  Establish which DCMS-funded organisation has collections of contemporary art as its remit: ACE does not have museum collections as its focus although it maintains its own loan collection; MLA does not focus on contemporary art nor have specialist staff in this area.

    —  Increase the matched funding for contemporary art purchases within the MLA/V&A Purchase Grant Scheme.

    —  Look at the success of artists' initiatives and commercial galleries in Glasgow, and subsequently Edinburgh, and use evidence as a template for the development of public collections and a collector-base in Manchester and beyond.

February 2005


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 6 April 2005