Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Written Evidence


Memorandum submitted by Sarah Thelwall

  I am a freelance strategist who works in the UK Art Market. I work on two levels 1) supply chain development initiatives and research projects 2) hands on organisational and artist development.

  This written evidence sets out my understanding of:

    —  The basic structure of the market(s).

    —  Recent developments.

    —  Key barriers to sector development.

    —  Suggested future developments.

UK ART MARKET—STRUCTURE & DEFINITIONS

  The UK Art Market is in fact split into two main areas—art as product and art as service. The market for art as product operates differently at the top and bottom ends (defined by price and re-saleability). The market for resale of art goods (via auction houses etc) only exists at the top end of the market. These markets are approximated below:


  Art as Product—This covers the market for art objects across all media and covers both permanent acquisitions (to public or private collections or for domestic use) and loans and residencies connected to exhibitions of art objects.

  Art as Service—This covers the market for the skills and resources that artists provide. It is as broad as the skills supplied by trained individuals who, upon leaving art college, choose to work in the Creative Industries. It is as focused as the provision of services through galleries such as fulfillment of commissions, residencies and provision of educational programme content.


KEY DEVELOPMENTS

  The UK art market has grown significantly over the past decade. The most notable developments are:

    —  The top end of the "Art as Product" market is demonstrating significant and ongoing growth from the position it occupied a decade ago. The most prominent marker of which is the ability of the UK market (artists, dealers and collectors) draw sufficient international collectors to it to justify the risk of establishing Frieze Art Fair in London.

    —  Relationships between publicly funded galleries and collectors continue to grow as this provides an alternative acquisition route (ie bequests) by which the galleries can acquire key pieces of contemporary art.

    —  The retailing of art goods for domestic use is also showing significant growth both in London and beyond as seen in the success of individual retailers such as Art Lounge (Birmingham) and The Biscuit Factory (Newcastle) but also seen in the ongoing success of The Affordable Art Fair (London).

    —  Growth of "Art as Service" as gallery education programmes expand.

    —  Growth of "Art as Service" as artists find more demand for their skill set as the Creative Industries grow.

BARRIERS TO GROWTH

  The "art as product" market faces barriers to growth which may be summarised as follows:

  Top End:

    —  Lack of appropriate trade association for commercial gallerists hampers ability of the sector to interface with DTI and prevents it from making use of export assistance.

    —  Lack of code of practice between elements of the market requires participants to learn by their mistakes which mitigates against sector development.

    —  Insufficient funds for and patchy acquisitions of contemporary art by publicly funded galleries often results in key works being sold to collectors and galleries abroad.

    —  Inappropriateness of acquisition models in public galleries—models that can no longer accommodate or reward the risk involved in buying the works of young artists.

    —  Lack of business skills and market knowledge amongst artists due to lack of coverage of these areas in HEI's.

  Lower end:

    —  Lack of business skills amongst artists means that few have the skills needed to sell direct to buyers nor do they have the skills required to establish sufficient B2B relationships with art retailers to provide them with a sensible level of income.

  The "art as service" market faces barriers to growth which are largely related to the appropriateness of the skill sets that artists develop whilst at art college. There is presently little emphasis given to the skills that they need to manage their portfolio careers or to take a proactive stance upon their career development as artists.

OVERALL DEVELOPMENT

  All elements of the market are reacting to this market growth. Clearly the focus of activities for artists, dealers, collectors, public galleries and funders are different. There are however a number of initiatives that would deliver value to across the board. These include:

    —  Improvements in data collection objectives, methodologies and processes so that these better reflect the goals of the participating elements, structures of the market and are better placed to provide ongoing & easily replenished statistics.

    —  Professionalisation & development of key elements of the supply chain.

    —  Recognition by key sector support bodies that this market is within their remit eg Arts Council England, Creative Industries Development Agencies, Regional Development Agencies, Small Business Service.

    —  Support for mechanisms that bring together the expertise held in the current continuing professional development organisations in the visual arts with the scale and resources of the Business Link network to improve access to such support.

    —  Support for key representative bodies eg a trade association for contemporary dealers in the primary art market, support of the trade association for artists (National Artist Network).

    —  Support of the professional development group for artists (Artists Professional Development Network).

    —  Support of an initiative for the professional development of gallerists and dealers.

    —  Development of best practice within the sector for artists, public galleries and dealers and their interactions with each other.

    —  Better use or more appropriate SIC codes and a separate index for the Art Market in the Creative Industries would be particularly useful in the improvement of the data on the sector.

CONCLUSIONS

  In conclusion the UK art market continues to demonstrate significant growth in all areas. There is the appetite within the sector to develop the infrastructure and practices that support it. There are a number of changes that, if made, could make quantum leap differences to the efficiency with which the supply chain operates. Such changes could be expected to be well received by the majority of organisations and individuals in the sector.

February 2005





 
previous page contents

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 6 April 2005