Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 252 - 259)

TUESDAY 29 JUNE 2004

BIPA, IWF, TWO WAY TV, VIDEO NETWORKS

  Chairman: Welcome. Thank you very much indeed for coming to see us. Michael Fabricant will start the questions.

  Q252  Michael Fabricant: We heard earlier that Local Loop Unbundling may or may not be of benefit to people providing video down telephone lines. I would like to ask Roger Lynch whether the recent announcement by BT is actually, in practice, going to help the provision of such services.

  Mr Lynch: I think it will help it immensely. It has already been done now. Mr Bryant asked earlier about when the Westminster cable system was going to be upgraded. In fact, that whole area now is upgraded to the telephone to be able to receive 60 channels of digital television and on demand television. What Local Loop Unbundling and the announcement from BT does is make it economically viable to roll that out in a large area.

  Q253  Michael Fabricant: Given that Video On Demand is potentially here and now and, certainly in certain parts of London, provided by Video Networks, and given that you were listening to the debate earlier on when we were talking to NTL and Telewest, do you think that Video On Demand is the future, and broadcasting, in its traditional sense, is dead, and therefore it follows the BBC is dead? Or do you see the two co-existing?

  Mr Lynch: I see the two melding together, frankly. That is what we attempt to do on our service now. We offer broadcast television, a large array of broadcast channels, including all the BBC channels, as well as currently about 5,000 different programmes on demand. Where it melds together is things like on BBC1 currently, or BBC2 or Channel 4, where you can look at what is on but you can also scroll back in the programme guide and watch programmes that have been broadcast already that are available on our server. So it is broadcast in the sense that these are programmes that the BBC decided to commission or produce and schedule but it is made available on demand much like a PVR would do, except in this case you do not have to plan it, it is available on the server.

  Q254  Michael Fabricant: Of course the BBC are talking about providing their own video archive in due course. Have you spoken to them at all, because presumably the technology that Video Networks is employing is similar sort of technology to that which the BBC uses?

  Mr Lynch: We have spent a lot of time with the BBC on this issue. I think the technology would be different in the sense that what we deliver is television, whether it is on demand or broadcast. That implies a completely different quality level than what is delivered on the internet. The infrastructure that we build to do on demand television, I think, will be very different from what the BBC would do to enable the creative archive through the internet or through their interactive media player. What we want to do, as the BBC frees up its archive, is to make it available over our platform and, indeed, it should be available over any other platform that could carry it to the licence fee payers.

  Q255  Michael Fabricant: Let us get this absolutely clear: I am not paid to advertise Video Networks, but I think you are one of the first in the UK to do this, if not the first. Video Networks is providing broadcast television down an ordinary telephone line (correct me if I am wrong) and what I can do through some form of remote control or whatever is get your server, your computer, based wherever it is—presumably in London—to feed the programmes that I want in real time down the telephone line and I look at a picture which is every bit as good as broadcast television, by cable or by satellite. Is that right?

  Mr Lynch: That is correct. You would not notice any difference, looking at the picture.

  Q256  Michael Fabricant: Let us just pursue this a little further. What future is there for cable or satellite in the conventional sense, given that presumably it is more difficult for a satellite footprint to actually target an individual home? Is there a future?

  Mr Lynch: I think, in particular in this country, where you have such a strong and dominant satellite provider there will be a future because they are very innovative. They are just scratching the surface about what they will be able to do with the SkyPlus box. I think what they will attempt to do is continue to expand the capacity of that to capture more and more of the broadcast signal and be able to store it so that you can create your own on demand library. Where it will get difficult is in relation to what you have been talking about, the creative archive. Today we already have hundreds of archive BBC programmes that are available on demand on our servers. We are already doing that commercially with the BBC. We would like to expand that very, very significantly. That is going to be very difficult for satellite to be able to do.

  Q257  Michael Fabricant: I think SkyPlus can store about 18 hours at any one time. Of course, with a main server, how long is a piece of string? You can have as many drives as you want. Could I ask of Video Networks: how many hours right now, with the equipment you have, are you capable of storing?

  Mr Lynch: Our servers today store 10,000 hours of content.

  Q258  Michael Fabricant: Which I could access at any time?

  Mr Lynch: Yes. Currently, I believe, there are 7,000 items of content available on our servers, of which 5,000 are entertainment, movies, television programmes and music videos, and the others are more informational, such as we have an information service with the Borough of Newham that has probably 20 hours of content about local housing, benefits, health and schooling.

  Q259  Michael Fabricant: Presumably you need sufficient bandwidth to deliver this to the consumer. What bandwidth is it that you require and what are the constraints to panning out your service throughout the United Kingdom, or similar services by competitors throughout the United Kingdom?

  Mr Lynch: Today we use about four megabytes in total but we deliver not only the television service with that, we deliver a one megabyte broadband internet service for the PC. As we expand outside of London, the distance from the telephone exchanges to the home gets greater and the amount of bandwidth that is available reduces correspondingly. There are newer technologies coming along, the first of which is encoding the standard, such as Mpeg 4, of which we may well be the first operator anywhere in the world to roll out this year, which will reduce in half the amount of bandwidth that we require to transmit a given video quality. There are also new standards coming out in ADSL which will have the impact of doubling the amount of bandwidth that can be delivered over a copper wire. So the compounding effect of these technologies means that as we roll out our service to larger and larger areas around the UK we will be able to deliver very high quality pictures to a very high percentage of the population.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 December 2004