Select Committee on Culture, Media and Sport Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 380 - 382)

TUESDAY 7 SEPTEMBER 2004

BECTU, EQUITY AND NUJ

  Q380  Ms Shipley: I know that you believe it because you have stated you believe it, but how is it?

  Mr McGarry: I believe the majority of people in this country look upon the provision of entertainment in its broadest sense—if one can define it. We are not talking here just about comedy and light entertainment, we are talking about entertainment which can be serious drama or the range of programme provision. I think the majority of people in this country do believe that that is a service they are getting in return for paying their licence fee. I do think that is what the majority of people believe.

  Mr Bolton: Firstly, I would not disagree with anything that Ian has said, so what I say will be relatively brief in adding to it. The BBC is not just a broadcaster, it is a cultural institution in this country that reflects in terms of what people see and hear and the life of this country, and helps the country feel at ease with itself. I think that is a public service responsibility. It makes a contribution to the democratic process in this country. When, in times of crisis, people want to know what is happening and want to go somewhere that is reliable and feel they are going to be properly informed they go to the BBC. That is public service. They are the only two things I would add to what my colleague has said.

  Mr Dear: In one of our early submissions we put a five point definition about accessibility: access to all to a range of high quality programmes; impartial news; broadcasting free from political and commercial pressure; broadcasting that caters for all sections of the community; and broadcasting that is owned by the public and accountable to the public. Within that different programmes will fulfil different remits. I think you can have entertainment programmes that also educate and inform. What would you say East Enders is? Some people will say that is public service broadcasting. Some people will say it is not. It serves sometimes to educate and sometimes to frustrate, but it can have a public service role; it will depend on how that is defined.

  Q381  Ms Shipley: I think what Mr Bolton says, the bit where you say you are unique, I thought that was an extremely powerful and important piece of public service broadcasting and unique for the BBC. What I was asking for was a unique selling point and not what could anybody do. What worries me about what you said, Mr McGarry and Mr Dear, is that actually any and all of the other broadcasters could do that, should they choose to and one might argue they would not but they could; whereas the unique selling point of the BBC is extremely important.

  Mr McGarry: I do not disagree with that statement rather than question.

  Mr Dear: The fact is that there is a whole range of programmes that fit in with how I have defined it, that the BBC would do what no other commercial broadcaster would do, because they would not be commercially viable programmes for them to be able to produce.

  Mr McGarry: I do not see anybody competing with the BBC to broadcast the Proms.

  Q382  Ms Shipley: I have a statement—that the BBC has to have its unique quality. What worries me is that parts of what you just said in answer to "What is its unique selling point?" have not been unique. Where it has been unique it has been very, very strong. Where it has not been unique it gets weaker.

  Mr McGarry: Yes, I tend to agree. I think the BBC has to do what it says on the can, which is produce the kinds of programmes of quality and depth and challenging nature that others will not do. I think it can do that in the context of broadcasting a whole range of programme material, but central to its role must be that—to do things that others are not doing.

  Chairman: Thank you very much, gentlemen, much appreciated.





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2004
Prepared 16 December 2004