Select Committee on Defence Minutes of Evidence


Examination of Witnesses (Questions 1140 - 1159)

WEDNESDAY 1 DECEMBER 2004 (AFTERNOON)

MR DES JAMES, MRS DOREEN JAMES, MR JAMES COLLINSON, MRS YVONNE COLLINSON, MR GEOFF GRAY AND MRS DIANE GRAY

  Q1140  Mr Hancock: They are still there?

  Mr Gray: No, they were sitting in Glasgow. They were sent to Surrey Police who then brought them to ourselves and I have had to sign for them.

  Q1141  Mr Hancock: Did those letters in any way open up a new line for you?

  Mr Gray: Those letters were of a typical 17-year-old; they were letters to a pen pal in Australia, and it showed him as a very healthy young man, a typical 17-year-old. So if those letters had been produced in front of the Coroner it would have then shown the Coroner that he is a typical young 17-year-old lad.

  Q1142  Mr Hancock: Were they written very close to the time of his death?

  Mrs Gray: They were actually letters from the girl, the correspondence; he had been writing to the girl and these were replies back and she was replying to his questions and things like that, and they went right up until almost a few weeks before he died.

  Q1143  Chairman: I am told by our Army and Air Force advisers that the standard death casualty procedure is to take an inventory of all the deceased's effects, so it should have been done; it is not whether it should have been done, it should have been done but clearly there are strong doubts whether it was done properly.

  Q1144  Mr Jones: Can I ask a question in terms of quite obviously the way in which you have been dealt with by the MoD has been quite appalling, not only in terms of the lack of investigations of these deaths but also clearly the way you were treated afterwards; and having spoken to other families I think that is a similar situation as well. We have to look at things we can do to improve on the situation in terms of when people are in the very unfortunate position in which you find yourselves. Is there anything that we can do to improve that? I look, for example, towards Police Forces that employ Family Liaison Officers that deal with murder victims' families and so on, and I know from when there was the Bali bombing I had a constituent who died and Durham Police and the Family Liaison Officer were very good at helping the family through exactly some of the points you are talking about and getting some questions answered, or just trying to lift that cloak of fog that there was at that time. Do you think it would be a good idea to have someone whose specific job it was actually not just to drop off effects and answer questions once, but actually to work with the families after?

  Mr Gray: I think the first lesson that should be learnt is that when there is a death within an Army barracks or Army institution there should be an investigation.

  Q1145  Mr Jones: We are going to come on to that later on. I just want to talk about how you are actually treated afterwards.

  Mr Gray: The Police Liaison Officers did work very, very hard but unfortunately we were in a bit of a strange situation, we were finding out information before the Liaison Officer was; they were not kept up to speed. If there is going to be a change there that is what needs to happen; the Liaison Officer needs to know what is happening before it is on Sky News.

  Mr Collinson: You are saying what sort of relationship should you have with the Army and that. The day James died Yvonne asked the Padre and Commanding Officer to come to the house, to say, where was James? And they actually turned round and said, "We do not know." You have just been told that your son has died and they cannot even tell you where he is. What faith does that give you in them?

  Mrs Collinson: I think the other thing is they need to inform the relatives and next of kin a bit quicker. I have heard that for some people it has taken days to be informed that their child has died. In our case it was only hours, but too many hours.

  Q1146  Mr Jones: We heard this morning basically that once the funeral was over that was it, nobody wanted to know. But did you get any basic visits from the Commanding Officers or letters of condolence?

  Mr Collinson: We had plenty of letters of condolences. Our letter of condolence says that James died at 9.50. It was not until three months later, during a proper investigation, that we found out that the "man down" call went out at 9.33. So James had died before 9.50 and all the condolence letters did not mean a thing then. Then to find out he died before 9.33, that is the way it was.

  Mr Gray: The point about condolence letters, we were sent—and I have got the letter at home, I cannot remember the officer's name but he is very high ranking—a condolence letter that was dated three days before Geoff died. It was obviously an error but it is another slap in the face, when you look at it, and it is written in green ink.

  Q1147  Mr Cran: Insensitive.

  Mr Gray: Yes, that is right.

  Mrs Gray: Can I just go back to what we came on to before this? When the Padre and the Captain turned up at my door they refused to tell me anything because it was not me who signed Geoff into the Army, and I found that very disturbing, and I got maybe a bit hysterical.

  Q1148  Mr Jones: They just told you your son had died—

  Mrs Gray: No. They said, "Can you bring Geoff Gray home, please?" and I said, "What is wrong?" and she said, "Can you please get your husband home?" And I knew it was a Padre—well, a vicar type person—and a woman in a suit, who introduced herself as an officer.

  Q1149  Mr Jones: Would you agree, Diane, that there is a whole need then for the Army or Armed Forces to actually look at the way in which they deal with breaking the news—

  Mrs Gray: How the families are told, yes.

  Q1150  Mr Jones: About breaking the news but also the support to the families afterwards?

  Mrs Gray: Most definitely.

  Q1151  Mr Hancock: How long did you have to wait, Mrs Gray, for Geoff to come home from work?

  Mrs Gray: Until she was nearly out of breath.

  Q1152  Mr Hancock: Sorry?

  Mrs Gray: I grabbed hold of her and held her up against the wall by her neck, and I said, "Tell me. What is wrong?" I then realised, when she had not said anything, they only send a Padre if somebody dies, so I said to her, "Is he dead?" She still refused to answer. I said, "Just nod or shake your head, is he dead?" And she nodded her head. Then I had to phone Geoff to tell him to come home.

  Q1153  Mr Roy: Another point in relation to that. What do you think would happen—and I know this has happened—whereby parents have split up since the forms were signed? If you had been split up and living in another house what do you think they would have done, would they have walked away then?

  Mrs Gray: They would not have come and told me, I do not think.

  Q1154  Mr Roy: So they would know, for example, that the couple had split up and they turn out and it is the mother that is there, and they say, "Where does the father live, because we need to tell him something that we are not prepared to tell you?"

  Mrs Gray: Yes, because she asked me who I was and I said, "I am Geoff's Mum," as soon as they said they were from Deepcut, and she said, "Who are you?" and I said, "I am Geoff's Mum." And she still refused to tell me.

  Mr James: Excuse me, could I just answer the question you asked before because I have not answered the question you asked before yet? The Commanding Officer at Deepcut at the time of Cheryl's death was Lieutenant Colonel Nigel Barrie Josling, I am sure you are aware. It may surprise you to know that we were not even aware of that until 2002, seven years after she died. So the answer to the question, did we hear from him, did he speak to us, did we have any correspondence, did we have an apology, I think the answer is obvious.

  Q1155  Mr Jones: So you had no letter at all?

  Mr James: Nothing whatsoever. We did not know who he was and still do not know what he looks like.

  Mrs James: We did not know his name until 2002.

  Q1156  Mr Jones: So did you get anyone visiting?

  Mrs James: No one.

  Mr James: I think it is such an important point. We were told on the Monday of the day on which she died. We were not asked to identify her.

  Mrs James: We did not know it was Cheryl for sure until the Friday.

  Mr James: So we were not able to see her until Friday, so for four days we were clinging to some forlorn hope that it might not even have been her.

  Q1157  Mr Jones: How were you told, Jim?

  Mr Collinson: James died on the Sunday and Yvonne asked, as I said, to go and see James, and the first answer was, "We do not know where he is," and it was the Wednesday before we were allowed to go and see James and identify him.

  Q1158  Mr Jones: Can I now turn to what your understanding was of the actual responsibilities that the Army had in terms of your children? They left your home, as we have described earlier on, to join the Army. What is your view, your understanding of what their responsibility was or should have been in terms of the duty of care in looking after their welfare?

  Mr Gray: Signing Geoff for the Army, with him being under 18, I presumed that the Army were taking over looking after Geoff. What this is all about is duty of care. They did have a duty of care to him and they failed in that duty of care in the most dramatic way possible. I think young soldiers should be better looked after within the Armed Forces in general. They are still children, that is why you as a parent sign that piece of paper; they are still children and they should be cared for far better, in my opinion.

  Mrs James: I think it is a question of the Army not knowing what the left hand and the right hand are doing. There is no communication between any of the groups, the Liaison Officer—they said "liaison", there is no liaison. You never have one specific person to speak to if you have a query, they just push you around from different departments; you never have a name, just a room number sometimes.

  Mr James: I have lost count of the number of times we telephoned, and got passed around three, four, five times and you actually just give up because every time somebody picks up the phone they say, "Can you explain it to me?" So you explain it to them and then they pass you on to somebody else. In 1996 it was taking me 10 weeks to get a reply from the MoD. I was being referred to a room number. Even the Liaison Officer—we never met Surrey Police in 1995.

  Q1159  Mr Jones: Can I ask about when Cheryl was actually in the Army? We are told now, for example, on the numerous visits we have made, that parents can ring up and talk to somebody about what their youngster is doing. Were you able to do that?

  Mrs James: Impossible, absolutely impossible.


 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 March 2005