Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Further memorandum from the Health and Safety Executive

  I write to provide the additional information requested by the Defence Committee on 7 July when I gave oral evidence on behalf of the HSE.

  Specifically, you requested:

    1.  A list of Armed Services fatal accidents known to HSE and subsequent HSE action (Annex 1)

    2.  HSE records of contacts with the Armed Services relating to weapons accidents and inspection of use of hand weapons (Annex 2)

    3.  Information on HSE enforcement against MoD—Crown Censures and Crown Notices (Annex 3)

    4.  Examples of HSE recommendations made to MoD and MoD responses (Annex 4)

  Interest was also expressed in the application of European legislation to MoD. I am therefore also enclosing a list of UK regulations based on Directives which include exemptions/disapplications for the Armed Forces. (Annex 5)

  Some brief remarks have been made in support of each Annex to help establish the context.

  In my evidence before the Committee on 7 July, I may have given the impression that HSE had been informed by MoD about the deaths of the four recruits at Deepcut Barracks. I would like to make it clear that, as stated in HSE's written evidence, we have no records that these deaths were notified to HSE, though Surrey Police did contact HSE in 2002 to discuss an element of their investigation. (See HSE Written Evidence para 42.) Apart from the MoD exemption in relation to RIDDOR, it is possible that the deaths were not reported to us because there was no apprehension at the time that they could be work-related. Suicides and murders are not normally matters for HSE.

  In response to a generally perceived need to improve liaison between the various bodies involved in investigation of work-related deaths, a Work-Related Death Protocol was agreed in 1998. The protocol had the objective of ensuring coordination and timely decision-making in the investigation of work-related deaths between HSE, the police and other relevant bodies. The protocol was revised in 2000 and inspection guidelines were published in 2003. The police are concerned with potential non-safety serious offences such as manslaughter while the HSE pursue investigation of potential health and safety offences. I enclose a copy of the 2000 protocol and the guidelines.

  The WRDP makes allowance for consultation as to whether a death is work-related in cases of doubt. For example, a recent apparent suicide at Catterick Garrison was directly notified within 24 hours by the police to the appropriate HSE office and HSE was able to advise on potential issues, such as stress, which would be relevant to categorising the death as work-related. On the basis of discussions with the police, it seems that this is not a work-related death and HSE will not be involved in the investigation, though the police will contact the HSE again if evidence to the contrary emerges.

  I would like to take this opportunity to draw the Committee's attention to the developing sources of guidance and support that will impact upon HSE's future role in supporting the Armed Forces in meeting their "duty of care" to recruits.

  In the period since the first of the Deepcut deaths, HSE has been developing an approach to helping organisations deal with work-related stress. The publication of Stress Management standards later this year will set in place a framework within which all employers, including MoD can work to tackle stress effectively across their workforce.

  In the meantime, I have enclosed a copy of HSE's existing guidance package and would draw your attention in particular to paragraphs 70 to 72 in "Tackling work-related stress—a manager's guide" which deal with Bullying and Harassment.

  HSE has already discussed the matters arising from the Surrey Police Deepcut Investigation with MoD, and will continue to offer help and support in this area. HSE has also contacted the Adult Learning Inspectorate with a view to sharing information and developing a coordinated approach to working with MoD on these issues.

  In June, MoD agreed to institute a project on setting new health and safety targets, as part of HSE's new "Government Setting an Example" Programme. This programme aims to bring health and safety management in public services into line with the best of private sector employers. MoD has had some difficulty in producing a valid dataset for Armed Service health and safety statistics to compare with those for MoD civilian workers. However, MoD is actively reviewing its systems for monitoring health and safety performance. This is part of a current line of HSE work with MoD, with a view to setting a baseline of performance for the project. It is hoped that this exercise will help fill in gaps in information available to HSE as a result of the disapplication of the RIDDOR reporting requirements to service personnel on duty.

  HSE would be happy to provide further information on these or any other matters as the Committee requires.



 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 March 2005