Select Committee on Defence Written Evidence


Memorandum from ***

  I currently serve, with 29 years service experience, as a member of the educational staff in the Royal Air Force at ***. Whilst I welcome the initiative by Parliament to introduce a Duty of Care policy for trainees I am concerned that this initiative is not extended to the uniformed staff who have to implement this policy.

With reducing numbers of uniformed staff available to provide Duty of Care there is increased pressure on those that remain. Also, due to limited government funding the facilities available for trainees to enjoy themselves whilst in training, particularly after hours, has gradually been eroded away. It is little wonder that those who drive get caught for drunk driving at the very least and they are the lucky ones! Also, there are major differences between training establishments regarding. facilities available to trainees.

  Recent and future reductions in service personnel at training establishments can only serve to worsen the Service ethos being delivered to trainees. Lt Col (ret'd) Haes is on record in his original report following Deep Cut as having highlighted the need for better trained and more service personnel, not an increase of civilian personnel, to deliver training. First impressions in training go a long way in moulding the attitude of trainees. This cannot be achieved by the contractorisation and civilianisation of military training. In some cases trainees may not be exposed to personnel from their respective trades for almost two years. It is imperative that training staff are drawn from the workplace expose trainees to those who have real experience of the workplace.

  There is a perception amongst service personnel that senior officers, whilst listening, are not hearing the concerns of senior non-commissioned officers. There is only so much that permanent members of staff can be expected to do both during the course of the normal working day and after duty hours. Too much is expected from our "lords and masters" and little is given in return.

  I would welcome the chance to speak with the Committee direct on these issues and others that may arise. I am not one to write anonymously and stand by the points I have raised.

December 2004





 
previous page contents next page

House of Commons home page Parliament home page House of Lords home page search page enquiries index

© Parliamentary copyright 2005
Prepared 14 March 2005